이메일 피드백과 온라인 컨퍼런스를 활용한 전공 영어 글쓰기 사례연구
A Korean EFL college student’s disciplinary writing experience with email feedback and online conference
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This is a case study of a Korean college student who performed process-oriented disciplinary writing, referring to teacher feedback via email and online conference. The study explored how the student incorporated teacher feedback while rewriting the original draft multiple times for seven weeks. The data of the study are composed of teacher-student email exchanges, feedback files, online conference audio/video, reflection journals, and the student’s drafts written on a teaching method, Desuggestopedia. The findings of the study indicate that the student found it difficult to accommodate teacher commentaries that were indirect and implicit, such as questions for clarification and comments that demanded further thinking. In contrast, he easily incorporated the feedback that directly addressed language points or organizational issues, although he was sometimes confused when given explicit feedback about prepositions in the phrasal verbs. Despite the differential effects of feedback on the rewriting process, the student believed that consistent feedback from the teacher was beneficial for his growth as a student writer. The study also found that the online conference and email facilitated scaffolded interaction between the student and the teacher. This increased interaction raised the student’s motivation for rewriting and willingness to continue writing practice.
Abstract
This is a case study of a Korean college student who performed process-oriented disciplinary writing, referring to teacher feedback via email and online conference. The study explored how the student incorporated teacher feedback while rewriting the original draft multiple times for seven weeks. The data of the study are composed of teacher-student email exchanges, feedback files, online conference audio/video, reflection journals, and the student’s drafts written on a teaching method, Desuggestopedia. The findings of the study indicate that the student found it difficult to accommodate teacher commentaries that were indirect and implicit, such as questions for clarification and comments that demanded further thinking. In contrast, he easily incorporated the feedback that directly addressed language points or organizational issues, although he was sometimes confused when given explicit feedback about prepositions in the phrasal verbs. Despite the differential effects of feedback on the rewriting process, the student believed that consistent feedback from the teacher was beneficial for his growth as a student writer. The study also found that the online conference and email facilitated scaffolded interaction between the student and the teacher. This increased interaction raised the student’s motivation for rewriting and willingness to continue writing practice.
참고문헌 (52)
- 김성연, "한국 중등학교 학습자의 영어 쓰기에 대한 자신감, 불안, 동기", 현대영어교육, 15(2), pp.91~112 (2014), 현대영어교육학회
- 김성연, "영어과 예비교사를 위한 전공 글쓰기 역량 강화 방안: 온라인 PBL을 활용한 내용 중심의 영어 쓰기", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 24(1), pp.37~63 (2021), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 안경자, "예비교사를 위한 과정중심 영어 글쓰기 지도 모형 개발 및 적용 효과", 영어학, 20, pp.64~88 (2020), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- Anson, C. M., "The WAC casebook: Scenes for faculty reflection and program development" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Arndt, V., "Teaching composition around the Pacific rim: Politics and pedagogy", pp.90~116 (1993), Multilingual Matters
- Ashwell, T., "Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), pp.227~257 (2000)
- Bean, J. C., "Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom" (2021), Jossey-Bass Publishers
- Braine, G., "Beyond word processing : Networked computers in ESL writing classes", Computers and Composition, 14(1), pp.45~58 (1997)
- Chandler, J., "The efficacy of various kinds of error correction for improvement of the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), pp.267~296 (2003)
- Cohen, A. D., "Learner strategies in language learning", pp.57~69 (1987), Prentice Hall
- "English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon" (2015)[URL]
- Elola, I., "Writing in Spanish as a second and heritage language : Past, present, and future", Hispania, 100, pp.119~124 (2017)
- Eriksson, A., "Redesigning a discipline-specific writing assignments to improve writing on an EMI programme of engineering", Journal of Academic Writing, 8(2), pp.48~66 (2018)
- Fathman, A., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.178~190 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Ferris, D., "The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, pp.49~62 (2004)
- Ferris, D., "Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues", pp.81~104 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Ferris, D., "Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Ferris, D., "Error feedback in L2 writing classes : How explicit does it need to be", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, pp.161~184 (2001)
- Goldstein, L., "Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences", TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), pp.443~460 (1990)
- Greenfield, R., "Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL : A case study in Hong Kong", Language Learning and Technology, 7(1), pp.46~70 (2003)
- Hedgcock, J., "Some input on input : Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing", The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), pp.287~308 (1996)
- Hewett, B. L., "Synchronous online conference-based instruction : A study of whiteboard interactions and student writing", Computers and Composition, 23, pp.4~31 (2006)
- Hewings, A., "Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues", pp.225~244 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Hirvela, A., "Handbook of second and foreign language writing", pp.45~63 (2016), Mouton de Gruyter
- Hyland, K., "Feedback on second language student’s writing", Language Teaching, 39, pp.83~101 (2006)
- Jacobs, H. L., "Testing ESL composition: A practical approach" (1981), Newbury House
- Jiang, A. L., "Innovation in language learning and teaching", pp.173~195 (2017), Palgrave Macmillan
- 전재은, "Internationalization by English-Medium Instruction? Professors’ decoupling behaviors to EMI policy in Korean higher education", KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 17(2), pp.297~318 (2020), 한국교육개발원[DOI]
- Kaplan, R. B., "Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education", Language Learning, 16, pp.1~20 (1966)
- 김성연, "Pre-service Teachers’ Experience of Online Content-based English Writing", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 18(2), pp.88~111 (2015), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- Lalande, J., "Reducing composition errors : An experiment", The Modern Language Journal, 66(2), pp.140~149 (1982)
- Larsen-Freeman, D., "Techniques & principles in language teaching" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Lee, I., "Teacher written corrective feedback : Less is more", Language Teaching, 52, pp.524~536 (2019)
- 이요안, "Writing-to-Learn in English: In-Class Timed Writing for Content Learning", 영어교육, 67(3), pp.51~75 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- Liu, Xuelian, "EFL College Students’ Reactions to Their Writing Teachers’ Corrective Feedback", 영어교육, 69(3), pp.81~103 (2014), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- Menke, M. R., "Student and faculty perceptions of writing in a foreign language studies major", Foreign Language Annals, 52, pp.388~412 (2019)
- Prinz, P., "From EFL to EMI : Developing writing skills for the humanities", ESP Today, 5(2), pp.172~195 (2017)
- Robb, T., "Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality", TESOL Quarterly, 20, pp.83~93 (1986)
- Russell, J., "Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching", pp.133~163 (2006), John Benjamins
- María del Mar Sánchez-Pérez, "Predicting content proficiency through disciplinary-literacy variables in English-medium writing", System, 97, pp.102463~ (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Shanahan, T., "What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter", Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), pp.7~18 (2012)
- Sheen, Y., "Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners", System, 37(4), pp.556~569 (2009)
- Truscott, J., "Dialogue : Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction : A response to Chandler", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, pp.337~343 (2004)
- Truscott, J., "The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately", Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, pp.292~305 (2007)
- Tuzi, F., "The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course", Computers and Composition, 21(2), pp.217~235 (2004)
- Ware, P., "Confidence and competition online : ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom", Computers and Composition, 21(4), pp.451~468 (2004)
- Warschauer, M., "Networking into academic discourse", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), pp.45~58 (2002)
- Warschauer, M., "Computer learning networks and student empowerment", System, 24(1), pp.1~14 (1996)
- Williams, J., "Tutoring and revision : Second language writers in the writing center", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), pp.173~201 (2004)
- Yang, M., "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), pp.179~200 (2006)
- Yin, R. K., "Case study research: Design and methods" (2014), Sage Publications
- Zamel, V., "Responding to student writing", TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), pp.79~101 (1985)
