『東海道四谷怪談』영화화에 대한 일고찰 -나카가와 노부오(中川信夫)의 <東海道四谷怪談>의 경우-
A study on making a Film “Tokaido Yotsuya Kaidann” : focused on the movie <Tokaido Yotsuya Kaidann> of Director Nobuo Nakagawa
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is about Tokaido Yotsuya Kaidann and <Tokaido YotsuyaKaidann>. The former was premiered in 1825 and the latter was made on the basisof the original text in 1959. Tokaido Yotsuya Kaidann was first performed at thesame time as Chushingura and borrowed from the Sekai of Chushingura. Nanbokucontrasted humans with ghosts, external ugliness with internal wickedness, andfiction with non-fiction. Also, he improved reality through that. But that does notmean that he looked upon the world in terms of a dichotomy. He showed theoverthrow of ideology and the times for positioning the audience at a vague boundary. Periodical characteristics is as follows. The 「Yotsuya zatsudannsyuu」 factionstrengthen the role of the ghost, and emphasizes the sense of horror for that. Onthe other hand, Yotsuya Kaidann contrasts filial piety with loyalty and public desirewith private desire by adding real incidents with the sense of horror. The <TokaidoYotsuya Kaidann> film describes Iemon as weak by weakening an evil side of himrelatively. That also makes viewers feel pity for Iemon because he committed suicidefor repentance and apology. And that finally goes off into the sunset by focusingon love, not public revenge but private revenge. In conclusion, Yotsuya Kaidann makes people experience fear by providing avisual image, and have a topic about universal human beauty and ugliness, goodand evil, and truth and fiction. Those are the reasons that discourse of YotsuyaKaidann and 「Oiwa」 had been repeated through a diverse range of media. Also,Yotsuya Kaidann is not dichotomous but provides a crevice in interpretation. Thatis the because Yotsuya Kaidann live on.
Abstract
This paper is about Tokaido Yotsuya Kaidann and <Tokaido YotsuyaKaidann>. The former was premiered in 1825 and the latter was made on the basisof the original text in 1959. Tokaido Yotsuya Kaidann was first performed at thesame time as Chushingura and borrowed from the Sekai of Chushingura. Nanbokucontrasted humans with ghosts, external ugliness with internal wickedness, andfiction with non-fiction. Also, he improved reality through that. But that does notmean that he looked upon the world in terms of a dichotomy. He showed theoverthrow of ideology and the times for positioning the audience at a vague boundary. Periodical characteristics is as follows. The 「Yotsuya zatsudannsyuu」 factionstrengthen the role of the ghost, and emphasizes the sense of horror for that. Onthe other hand, Yotsuya Kaidann contrasts filial piety with loyalty and public desirewith private desire by adding real incidents with the sense of horror. The <TokaidoYotsuya Kaidann> film describes Iemon as weak by weakening an evil side of himrelatively. That also makes viewers feel pity for Iemon because he committed suicidefor repentance and apology. And that finally goes off into the sunset by focusingon love, not public revenge but private revenge. In conclusion, Yotsuya Kaidann makes people experience fear by providing avisual image, and have a topic about universal human beauty and ugliness, goodand evil, and truth and fiction. Those are the reasons that discourse of YotsuyaKaidann and 「Oiwa」 had been repeated through a diverse range of media. Also,Yotsuya Kaidann is not dichotomous but provides a crevice in interpretation. Thatis the because Yotsuya Kaidann live on.
참고문헌 (15)
- 카를 로젠크란츠, "추의 미학", pp.10~ (2008), 나남
- 편용우, "쓰루야 난보쿠(鶴屋南北)의 『도카이도 요쓰야괴담(東海道四谷怪談)』 연구", 석사, 일어일문학, pp.2004
- 荒木繁, "南北の世界, In 日本文学講座Ⅱ", pp.176~177 (1989), 大修館
- 内山一樹, "総論日本映画の怪異と幻想, In 怪奇と幻想の回路ー怪談からJホラーへ", pp.11~17 (2008), 森話社
- 大澤淨, "新東宝のお化け映画と『東海道四谷怪談』ジャンルの復活と革新, In 怪奇と幻想の回路-怪談からJホラーへ", pp.68~75 (2008), 森話社
- 河竹繁俊, "日本演劇全史", pp.708~ (1959), 岩波書店
- 郡司正勝校注, "新潮日本古典集成(第四十五回)東海道四谷怪談", pp.30~179 (1981), 新潮社
- 黒沢清, "映画はおそろしい", pp.24~25 (2001), 青土社
- 高橋洋二, "別冊太陽 日本恐怖映画への招待", pp.35~ (2000), 平凡社
- 廣瀬愛, "映画「四谷怪談」考-木下恵介作品の場合", 尚絧学院大学紀要, (57) (2009), 尚絧学院大学
- 廣瀬愛, "映画「四谷怪談」考-中川信夫の実験的怪奇表現", 尚絧学院大学紀要, (61⋅62) (2011), 尚絧学院大学
- 本間正幸, "『東海道四谷怪談』私見", 成城国文学 (1990), 成城大学大学院文学研究科
- 横山泰子, "四谷怪談映画のお岩たち歌舞伎と別れ、別の女へ, In 怪奇と幻想の回路-怪談からJホラーへ", pp.149~151 (2008), 森話社
- 四方田犬彦, "日本の『忠臣蔵』と『四谷怪談』, In アジア映画の大衆的想像力" (2003), 青土社
- "일본영화정보시스템"[URL]
