본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

学習者の親疎が協働学習に及ぼす影響 -日本語ディベートのトピック設定過程を通して-

How influence on the collaborative learning from relationships between Learners : the topic selection process of the Japanese debate class

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

In this study, I focused on the process of 'topic selection' in the group activityat the Japanese Debate class that aim to analyze and consider the impact therelationship of the members in the group. It will be an opportunity to think the futureof Japanese classes required for the education at university. SHIN(2013) has practiced a "Japanese debate" as a lesson to enhance the learningsatisfaction and achievement of the Japanese Learners. Class has experienced"collaborative learning". Through the group activities, Learners found that thelearning of socio-cultural knowledge and behavior is more important than Japaneselanguage itself. The level of achievement and satisfaction of students of class wasappeared highly. However, Learners introspection after the semester was spoken that the successof group activities at the "Japanese Debate" largely determined by the relationshipof the members in the group. As the result, in GOOD group members were using communication and networklively and working properly as a community member. They've got the knowledgeand information successfully and easily more than BAD group members. Also, GOODgroup members experienced that socio-cultural roles from the collaboration andcontribution to the each other in the group. However, BAD group members, it wasimpossible to satisfy even one from five basic elements for collaborative learning. It's not only the problem in students or participatory lessons. Language teachersshould design the learner-centered class and coordinate group activities, facilitatethe lessons. In the future, it's necessary to examine the role of the teacher as a participantof activity member, to reconsider the relationship among students in group activitiesas a foundation for collaborative learning.

Abstract

In this study, I focused on the process of 'topic selection' in the group activityat the Japanese Debate class that aim to analyze and consider the impact therelationship of the members in the group. It will be an opportunity to think the futureof Japanese classes required for the education at university. SHIN(2013) has practiced a "Japanese debate" as a lesson to enhance the learningsatisfaction and achievement of the Japanese Learners. Class has experienced"collaborative learning". Through the group activities, Learners found that thelearning of socio-cultural knowledge and behavior is more important than Japaneselanguage itself. The level of achievement and satisfaction of students of class wasappeared highly. However, Learners introspection after the semester was spoken that the successof group activities at the "Japanese Debate" largely determined by the relationshipof the members in the group. As the result, in GOOD group members were using communication and networklively and working properly as a community member. They've got the knowledgeand information successfully and easily more than BAD group members. Also, GOODgroup members experienced that socio-cultural roles from the collaboration andcontribution to the each other in the group. However, BAD group members, it wasimpossible to satisfy even one from five basic elements for collaborative learning. It's not only the problem in students or participatory lessons. Language teachersshould design the learner-centered class and coordinate group activities, facilitatethe lessons. In the future, it's necessary to examine the role of the teacher as a participantof activity member, to reconsider the relationship among students in group activitiesas a foundation for collaborative learning.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 권오현, "사회과 디베이트의 효과적 지도방안-메리트-디메리트 비교 방식의 디베이트를 중심으로-", 사회과교육연구, 11(2), pp.9~35 (2004), 한국사회교과교육학회
  2. 김미랑, "토의·토론 수업 방법이 사회과 창의적 문제 해결력에 미치는 영향 : 디베이트와 브레인라이팅을 중심으로", 석사, 초등사회과교육, pp.2010
  3. 박은희, "한국 대학생의 일본어 학습동기와 일본인식에 관한 연구", 동북아 문화연구, 1(17), pp.517~534 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
  4. 서재천, "사회과 디베이트 학습법의 활용에대하여", 초등사회과교육, 8, pp.29~51 (1996), 한국사회교과교육학회
  5. 이은자, "외국인 유학생을 위한 한국어 토론 수업 설계와 지도 방법", 배달말, 50(50), pp.256~289 (2012), 배달말학회[DOI]
  6. 이정화, "한국어 학습자를 위한 효과적인 토론 수업 방안-모국어 화자와 한국어 학습자 토론 담화 분석을 중심으로-", 국제어문, (48), pp.315~348 (2010), 국제어문학회
  7. 케빈리, "대한민국 교육을 바꾼다 디베이트 Debate", 한겨레에듀, 1~295 (2001)
  8. 池田玲子, "ピア⋅ラーニング入門:創造的な学びのデザインのために" (2007), ひつじ書房
  9. 岡本明人, "『教室ディベート』の可能性", 現代教育科学, 444, pp.10~14 (1993)
  10. 川野哲也, "教育方法としてのディベートの可能性をさぐる-ディベート活用の理論化の試み-, In 教室ディベートへの挑戦<第6集>教育方法としてのディベートの可能性", pp.6~100 (1997), 学事出版
  11. 신은진, "日本語ディベート授業の学習者評価-授業満足度と関連して-", 일본어교육연구, (25), pp.159~174 (2013), 한국일어교육학회
  12. 諏訪昭宏, "日本語敎育へのディべ一トの導入法 : 韓國內のディべ一ト授業事例分析をもとに", 석사, 일어일문학, pp.2008
  13. 高橋寿夫, "授業の活性化に向けて-グループによる学生参加型授業の実践的考察-", 関西大学外国語教育フォーラム, 7, pp.23~34 (2008), 関西大学外国語教育研究機構
  14. 西谷まり, "ディベート活動を通じた口頭表現の指導法", 一橋大学留学生センター紀要, 4, pp.57~73 (2001), 一橋大学留学生センター
  15. ジョンソン, "改訂新版学習の輪-学び合いの協同教育入門-", pp.101~124 (2010), 二瓶社
  16. 二杉孝司, "『競技ディベート』と『教室ディベート』", 現代教育科学, 461, pp.9~12 (1995)
  17. 松下佳代, "第2章討論形式の授業をめぐる論点-構造化と自由度の配合-", 京都大学高等教育叢書, 19, pp.18~42 (2004), 京都大学
  18. 松本道弘, "やさしいディベート入門", pp.1~238 (1990), 中経出版
  19. 服部裕, "ディベートによる学生参加型授業の試み-「総合的学習」におけるディベートの可能性-", 秋田大学教育文化学部教育実践研究紀要, 25, pp.133~143 (2003), 秋田大学教育文化学部
  20. 樋口裕子, "話し合い能力と論理的能力に対するディベート授業の効果", 大谷女子国文, 36, pp.60~46 (2006), 大阪大谷大学
  21. Janney, L., "第5章ピアサポートを取り組んだ指導モデル, In 子どものソーシャルスキルとピアサポート", pp.109~130 (2006)
  22. 鷲尾敦, "グループ学習の効果をあげるためのグループ作り", 高田短期大学紀要, 30, pp.55~66 (2012), 高田短期大学
  23. 鷲尾敦他, "グループ学習におけるファシリテーター役配置の効果", 高田短期大学紀要, 31, pp.119~130 (2013), 高田短期大学
  24. Johnson, D. W., "学習の輪-学び合いの協同教育入門", pp.101~124 (2002), 二瓶社

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (32건)