본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

補助動詞「~ておく」の多義構造と派生関係

Polysemous Structure and Derivative Relations of Japanese Auxiliary Verb ‘V-teoku’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

.

Abstract

Modern Japanese ‘teoku’ has polysemous structure. A study on the polysemy of ‘teoku’ has been done by takahasi taro, yosikawa mutoki, suzuki sigeyuki, kasamachu ikuko, kikutchi yasuhito, yui kikuko, sakai mieko, and yamamoto yuko. However, it is too soon to tell that the classification, derivation process and semantic relations of ‘teoku’ have been completely explained. To answer this question, it is necessary to approach not only semantic but also formative aspects of ‘teoku’ as well as reconsider how to set fundamental meanings of it. In this respect, the present study attempted to classify ‘teoku’ based on the difference in sentence structure and reviewed it from the perspective of ‘teoku’ sematic transformation ‘Subject’, ‘Object’ and ‘Place’. The findings are as follows. Main verb ‘oku’ has the original meanings of (A) install: ‘to take a certain position’ and (B) fix: ‘to keep an object where it is’. When ‘teoku’ is used as auxiliary verb for the main verb ‘oku’, it has the fundamental meanings of (a) install: ‘to position a specific thing or person to a specific thing or place to intall’ and (b) fix: ‘to act on and change a specific thing or person to fix to a spatial place or a specific thing as it or he/she is’. Semantic transformation of ‘teoku’ is derived from (a) install and (b) fix. From ‘(a) install’ of ‘teoku’, ‘(①) act 1’: ‘uketeka’ meaning ‘place’ is derived; ‘(③) completion of act during a time’: temporalization of ‘place’ and ‘(④) completion of act before a set time and progression of consequence’. Among them, other derivations take place from ‘(①) act 1’ to ‘(①) act 2’ by abstractness of ‘an object’, and from ‘(④) completion of act before a set time and progression of consequence’ to ‘(⑤) prepare’ by the dropping of ni case). In addition, ‘(⑥) progression of act or state of a certain time’ is derived from ‘(b) fix’ by temporalization of ‘place’ and case substitution and ‘(⑦) neglect 1’ is derived by the dropping of hatarakikakesei and ni case. Again, ‘(⑧) neglect 2’ is derived from ‘(⑥) progression of act or state of a certain time’ by the dropping of hatarakikakesei.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 笠松郁子, "「しておく」を述語にする文", ことばの科学, 6, pp.117~139 (1993)
  2. 菊地康人, "「ておく」の分析", 東京大学留学生センター教育研究論集, 15, pp.1~20 (2009)
  3. 坂井美恵子, "「ておく」の文法化", 関西外国語大学留学生別科日本語教育論集, 11, pp.87~102 (2001)
  4. 鈴木重幸, "日本語文法・形態論", pp.397~400 (1972), むぎ書房
  5. 高橋太郎, "日本語動詞のアスペクト", pp.146~148 (1976), むぎ書房
  6. 森田良行, "基礎日本語辞典", pp.233~235 (1989), 角川書店
  7. 山本裕子, "「~ておく」の意味機能について", 名古屋女子大学紀要, 51, pp.207~218 (2005)
  8. 由井紀久子, "動詞オクにおける意味の抽象化過程", 阪大日本語研究, 7, pp.95~105 (1995)
  9. 吉川武時, "日本語動詞のアスペクト", pp.267~293 (1973), むぎ書房

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)