본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

三島戯曲における支配力と「女中」 -「只ほど高いものはない」論-

The Dominant nature and ‘Maid’ in Mishima Yukio’s Plays -An Analysis of “Tada hodo takai monowa nai”-

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper inverstigates Mishima’s plays focusing on the “maid”. Mishima put a lot of effort into drawing “home,” the smallest unit of human relations in society, and “family play” is one of the characteristics of his plays. The family form that Mishima drew is a postwar modern family model represented by a nuclear family, and its nature depends on the gender role division of work, such as “white-collar worker husband and homemaker wife”. In a word, the woman is confined in the home, and it is said that it is to be responsible for the home administration as a “housewife”. However, in the home depicted by Mishima, there is no figure of a woman who actually manages as a housewife, that is, a mistress who behaves perfectly as a mother and wife. Instead, the “maid”, who is another person who has entered the home, appears. In Tada hodo takai monowa nai (1952) confirmed in this paper, there was a fierce confrontation with the mistress in the “maid”, but the mistress gradually disappears. These changes may be deeply related to the process by which modern family forms take hold. In a word, the standpoint of the woman named “housewife” that the modern family system was born was confined in the home instead of erasing the existence of “maid” from the society, and it was made to take charge of housework and the child care. It can be said that women exclusively responsible for the function of housekeeping in the home shifted from “maid” to housewife, but the fundamental change does not occur, and the woman who became a housewife can be said to be the weak position than “maid”. In other words, because placed in the position of a housewife, the woman is not recognized professionally like a “maid” and could be regarded as being demoted to an existence with only empty power as a mistress. Mishima’s “maid” is the literary figure that can most effectively explore the power of women that results from the fact that the modern family specializes in home economics and the problems that inevitably accompany it. It can be said that there was.

Abstract

This paper inverstigates Mishima’s plays focusing on the “maid”. Mishima put a lot of effort into drawing “home,” the smallest unit of human relations in society, and “family play” is one of the characteristics of his plays. The family form that Mishima drew is a postwar modern family model represented by a nuclear family, and its nature depends on the gender role division of work, such as “white-collar worker husband and homemaker wife”. In a word, the woman is confined in the home, and it is said that it is to be responsible for the home administration as a “housewife”. However, in the home depicted by Mishima, there is no figure of a woman who actually manages as a housewife, that is, a mistress who behaves perfectly as a mother and wife. Instead, the “maid”, who is another person who has entered the home, appears. In Tada hodo takai monowa nai (1952) confirmed in this paper, there was a fierce confrontation with the mistress in the “maid”, but the mistress gradually disappears. These changes may be deeply related to the process by which modern family forms take hold. In a word, the standpoint of the woman named “housewife” that the modern family system was born was confined in the home instead of erasing the existence of “maid” from the society, and it was made to take charge of housework and the child care. It can be said that women exclusively responsible for the function of housekeeping in the home shifted from “maid” to housewife, but the fundamental change does not occur, and the woman who became a housewife can be said to be the weak position than “maid”. In other words, because placed in the position of a housewife, the woman is not recognized professionally like a “maid” and could be regarded as being demoted to an existence with only empty power as a mistress. Mishima’s “maid” is the literary figure that can most effectively explore the power of women that results from the fact that the modern family specializes in home economics and the problems that inevitably accompany it. It can be said that there was.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 이가현, "三島文学における「怪物」的女性像 -「近代家族」の発生と受容をめぐって-", 동아인문학, (45), pp.221~238 (2018), 동아인문학회[DOI]
  2. 이가현, "「家庭」を舞台とする三島文学 ― 戯曲と「女中」像を中心に ―", 일본학보, (118), pp.181~198 (2019), 한국일본학회[DOI]
  3. 上野千鶴子, "近代家族の成立と終焉" (1994), 岩波書店
  4. 上野千鶴子, "女ぎらい―ニッポンのミソジニー" (2010), 紀伊国屋書店
  5. 奥野建夫, "ねえやが消えて―演劇的家庭論" (1991), 河出書房新社
  6. 落合恵美子, "近代家族とフェミニズム" (1989), 勁草書房
  7. 落合恵美子, "21世紀家族へ" (2004), 有斐閣
  8. 小山静子, "家庭の生成と女性の国民化" (1999), 勁草書房
  9. 清水美智子, "<女中>イメージの家庭文化史" (2004), 世界思想社
  10. 鈴木晴夫, "三島由紀夫事典", pp.245~ (1976), 明治書院
  11. 田端康子, "ジェンダーと女性" (1997), 早稲田大学出版部
  12. デビッド, "純潔の近代―近代家族と親密性の比較社会学" (2007), 慶應義塾大学出版会
  13. 許昊, "三島由紀夫の作品における女中像の系譜―「料理番の女」から蓼科まで", 稿本近代文学, 19, pp.132~142 (1994), 筑波大学文芸・言語学系平岡研究室
  14. 前川直哉, "男の絆―明治の学生からボーイズ・ラブまで" (2011), 筑摩書房
  15. 三島由紀夫, "三島由紀夫全集 第4巻", pp.171~380 (1974), 新潮社
  16. 三島由紀夫, "三島由紀夫全集 第5巻" (1974), 新潮社
  17. 三島由紀夫, "決定版 三島由紀夫全集 第21巻", pp.753~761 (2003), 新潮社
  18. 三島由紀夫, "三島由紀夫全集 第20巻", pp.403~476 (1975), 新潮社
  19. 三島由紀夫, "三島由紀夫全集 第9巻", pp.181~240 (1973), 新潮社
  20. 三島由紀夫, "三島由紀夫全集 第27巻", pp.25~28 (1975), 新潮社
  21. 三島由紀夫, "三島由紀夫全集 第30巻", pp.587~ (1975), 新潮社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)