「3.11」をめぐるエッセイマンガの両義性
The Ambivalence of Essay Comics on “3/11”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on essay comics created by those who were affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake, known as “3/11”, and aims to clarify how the comic artists represented their experiences of “3/11”. First, the artists actively described their experiences in the form of essay comics, which played a journalistic role and represented a reality of an affected area and a victim’s individual experience that mass media did not report on. The essay comics have a tendency to depict the disaster victims in a cartoon style. This mode of description makes readers feel a sense of intimacy with them, but at the same time, it also has the possibility of reducing the uniqueness of a victim’s experience. Furthermore, for the authors who experienced “3/11”, the disaster not only destroyed their daily life, but likewise became a comic subject that attracted an great deal of social attention, giving them an opportunity for self-realization as an artist. Considering this finding, this paper insists that essay comics on “3/11” can be regarded as a site where ambivalent elements intertwine, such as cartoon and documentation, individuality and generality, citizen media and culture industry, and transmission to and recognition from others.
Abstract
This paper focuses on essay comics created by those who were affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake, known as “3/11”, and aims to clarify how the comic artists represented their experiences of “3/11”. First, the artists actively described their experiences in the form of essay comics, which played a journalistic role and represented a reality of an affected area and a victim’s individual experience that mass media did not report on. The essay comics have a tendency to depict the disaster victims in a cartoon style. This mode of description makes readers feel a sense of intimacy with them, but at the same time, it also has the possibility of reducing the uniqueness of a victim’s experience. Furthermore, for the authors who experienced “3/11”, the disaster not only destroyed their daily life, but likewise became a comic subject that attracted an great deal of social attention, giving them an opportunity for self-realization as an artist. Considering this finding, this paper insists that essay comics on “3/11” can be regarded as a site where ambivalent elements intertwine, such as cartoon and documentation, individuality and generality, citizen media and culture industry, and transmission to and recognition from others.
참고문헌 (25)
- 池上賢, "東日本大震災後のストーリー分析の可能性—マンガ作品を事例として", 応用社会学研究, 59, pp.73~87 (2017), 立教大学社会学部
- 井上きみどり, "わたしたちの震災物語—ハート再生ワーカーズ", pp.3~175 (2011), 集英社
- 井上きみどり, "ふくしまノート1巻", pp.1~145 (2013), 竹書房
- 井上きみどり, "ふくしまノート2巻", pp.1~161 (2015), 竹書房
- 表智之, "日本マンガ学会第14回大会シンポジウム—｢マンガと震災 第1部マンガ家の支援活動", マンガ研究, 21, pp.134~185 (2015), 日本マンガ学会
- 槻月沙江, "震災７日間", pp.5~125 (2011), 角川グループパブリッシング
- 坂田邦子, "メディアとサバルタニティ—東日本大震災における言説的弱者と<あわい>", pp.77~ (2022), 明石書店
- 須川亜紀子, "女性マンガ研究―欧米･日本･アジアをつなぐMANGA", pp.224~246 (2015), 青弓社
- Sugimoto Shogo, "記録とフィクション「3.11」以降の震災マンガにおける「災害」の表象", 일본문화연구, (68), pp.231~250 (2018), 동아시아일본학회[DOI]
- 鈴木繁, "女性マンガ研究―欧米･日本･アジアをつなぐMANGA", pp.247~265 (2015), 青弓社
- 世鳥アスカ, "明日、地震がやってくる!", pp.2~159 (2014), KADOKAWA
- ソルニット･レベッカ, "災害ユートピア—なぜそのとき特別な共同体が立ち上がるのか", pp.9~23 (2010), 亜紀書房
- 電通総研, "情報メディア白書2012", pp.60~ (2012), ダイヤモンド社
- 秦美香子, "マンガ文化 55のキーワード", pp.72~75 (2016), ミネルヴァ書房
- 福田充, "大震災とメディア—東日本大震災の教訓", pp.42~53 (2012), 北樹出版
- ひが栞, "生き残ってました。—主婦まんが家のオタオタ震災体験記", pp.13~185 (2012), 祥伝社
- フェリエ･ミカエル, "フクシマ･ノート—忘れない、災禍の物語", pp.1~4 (2013), 新評論
- マクラウド･スコット, "完全新訳版 マンガ学", pp.32~67 (2020), 復刊ドットコム
- 元町夏央, "東京を脱出してみたよ！ 脱出編", pp.5~159 (2014), 小学館
- モーリス＝スズキ･テッサ, "過去は死なない—メディア･記憶･歴史", pp.2~42 (2014), 岩波書店
- 山本佳世子, "マンガを通して見る東日本大震災による喪失と再生の語り", グリーフケア, 3, pp.67~88 (2015), 上智大学グリーフケア研究所
- 吉見俊哉, "311情報学—メディアはどう伝えたか", pp.2~31 (2012), 岩波書店
- 吉村和真, "マンガの教科書―マンガの歴史がわかる60話", pp.196~198 (2008), 臨川書店
- "震災7日間" (2011)[URL]