민관공모형 PF 복합개발사업 추진의 애로요인과 사업 활성화 방안
A Study on the Analyzing Bottlenecks of PPP(Public-Private Partnership)in Mixed-use Development Projects
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyzing bottlenecks of PPP(Public-Private Partnership)and vitality of urban re-generation in Mixed-use Development Projects. The PFV(Project Finance Vehicle) system, enforced since 2004 to solve the double taxation problem between a SPC(Special Purpose Company) and its shareholders, has shown a desirable performance regarding tax benefits both for PPP(Public-Private Partnership) and private development projects. PFV's contribution to reducing project risks through conservative market studies, active pre-sales and/or master leases of commercial real estates to property investors, efficient risk diversifications among project participants. Reducing project risks, in turn, lets lenders assure of a PFV's loan repayment. Though, it leaves some institutional supports to attract more development projects into the system. Some changes that it is prescribed by law concern with PFV's law in taxation problem. And Public sector is required to change its practices to select a winning consortium by outbidding land prices and attracting foreign direct investment, which make many negative side-effects on project feasibility.
Abstract
This study aims to analyzing bottlenecks of PPP(Public-Private Partnership)and vitality of urban re-generation in Mixed-use Development Projects. The PFV(Project Finance Vehicle) system, enforced since 2004 to solve the double taxation problem between a SPC(Special Purpose Company) and its shareholders, has shown a desirable performance regarding tax benefits both for PPP(Public-Private Partnership) and private development projects. PFV's contribution to reducing project risks through conservative market studies, active pre-sales and/or master leases of commercial real estates to property investors, efficient risk diversifications among project participants. Reducing project risks, in turn, lets lenders assure of a PFV's loan repayment. Though, it leaves some institutional supports to attract more development projects into the system. Some changes that it is prescribed by law concern with PFV's law in taxation problem. And Public sector is required to change its practices to select a winning consortium by outbidding land prices and attracting foreign direct investment, which make many negative side-effects on project feasibility.
참고문헌 (20)
- 리츠･펀드･PFV 등의 세제혜택이 ‘3년 일몰’ 시장에 미치는 파급효과, "김기형", 메리츠증권 부동산금윰연구소, ~, pp.Real Estate Market Report No.28 (2009)
- 김영상, "공공-민간 합동형 PF사업 개념 재검토 및 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 대형 복합개발사업의 공모동향과 발전방향에 관한 세미나 (2008)
- 김진, "부동산 개발사업의 위험 회피를 위한 PFV(Project Finance Vehicle)의 역할과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 부동산학연구, 14(3), pp.57~79 (2008), 한국부동산분석학회
- 김 진, "부동산 PF(Project Finance)대출의 부실화 요인에 관한 연구", 국토계획, 44(5), pp.175~191 (2009), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 대규모 개발 사업에 대한민간역할 확대방안, "김현아", 한국건설산업연구원, ~ (2007)
- 김현아, "현행 PF공모사업의 문제점과 정책과제", 국회 신영수의원 주최 정책토론회 (2009)
- "Real Estate Market Report"No, "메리츠증권 부동산금윰연구소", ~, pp.Real Estate Market Report No.25 (2009)
- PFV의 법적 근거마련과 개발전문리츠 제도의 활성화, "서후석", 메리츠증권 부동산금윰연구소, ~, pp.Real Estate Market Report No.27 (2009)
- 심교언, "공모형 개발사업의 당선자 특성분석", 한국부동산분석학회 2008 춘계 학술심포지엄 (2008)
- 오동훈, "공모형 개발사업의 배점 및 평가방식", 한국부동산분석학회 2008 춘계 학술 심포지엄 (2008)
- 이승우, "금융위기이후 공모형 PF사업의 실태와 정책방향", 건설이슈포커스, (22) (2009), 한국건설산업연구원
- 민관합동형 PF 사업의현황 및 효율화 방안, "이승우", 한국건설산업연구원, ~ (2008)
- 공모형 PF사업의 특성 및 사업성평가의 주요 요소. in: Rating Methodology, "이승태", 한국신용정보, ~ (2008)
- 이장권, "산업단지 개발을 통한 지역경제 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 최은영, "건설사 PF우발채무와 체계적 위험의 관계분석", 국토계획, 44(5), pp.45~57 (2009), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 미분양아파트 유동화 현황과 향후 발전방안, "황규완", 메리츠증권 부동산금융연구소, ~, pp.ISSUEREPORT NO.6 (2009)
- Nevitt, Peter K., "Project Financing. in: Euromoney Publications" (1995), UK
- Tinsley, Richard, "Advanced Project Financing - Structuring Risk-. in: Euromoney Publications" (2000), UK
- Roland J. Fuchs, "Mega-city growth and the future" (1994), United Nations University Press
- Martimort, David, "To build or not to build: Normative and positive theories of public–private partnerships", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(2) (2008)