라켓 종목별 유소년 선수의 신체조성, 체력 및 눈-손 협응력 비교 분석
Comparative Analysis of Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Eye-Hand Coordination of Youth players by Racket sport
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본연구는테니스, 배드민턴, 탁구종목에참여하는유소년남자선수들을대상으로신체조성, 체력, 눈-손협응력의종목별차이를비교·분석하고자하였다. D광역시에소속된경력2년이상의유소년선수총49명(테니스15명, 배드민턴20명, 탁구14명)을대상으로체성분분석측정, 체력및협응력테스트를실시하였으며, 결과는일원배치분산분석(ANOVA)과Scheffe 사후검증을통해분석되었다. 분석결과, BMI와체지방율은종목간유의한차이를보였고, 테니스선수들이가장낮은값을나타냈다. 체력항목에서는윗몸일으키기(근지구력), 사이드스텝(민첩성), 체전굴(유연성)에서테니스선수들이우수한성과를보였다. 반면, 근력, 반응속도, 눈-손협응력에서는유의한차이가나타나지않았다. 이러한결과는유소년기체력요소가종목특성과성장발달단계에따라다르게반응함을시사하며, 조기민첩성, 유연성개발과사춘기이후근력강화중심의체계적훈련접근이필요함을강조한다. 본연구는장기적선수발달모델(LTAD) 관점에서종목별맞춤형트레이닝설계와부상예방전략수립에실질적기초자료를제공한다.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare and analyze differences in body composition, physical fitness, and hand-eye coordination among male youth athletes participating in tennis, badminton, and table tennis. A total of 49 male youth athletes from D Metropolitan City, each with over two years of experience (tennis: n = 15, badminton: n = 20, table tennis: n = 14), were assessed using InBody analysis, physical fitness tests, and coordination evaluations. A one-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis, and Scheffé’s post-hoc test was conducted for variables that showed statistical significance. The results indicated significant differences in BMI and body fat percentage, with tennis players exhibiting the lowest values. Regarding physical fitness, significant differences were observed in sit-ups (muscular endurance), side-steps (agility), and sit and reach test(flexibility), with tennis players demonstrating superior performance. However, no significant differences were found in grip strength, reaction time, or hand-eye coordination. These findings suggest that physical development in youth athletes varies depending on the sport-specific demands and developmental stage. Early training that focuses on agility and flexibility, followed by strength development after puberty, is recommended. This study provides practical insights for designing sport-specific training programs and injury prevention strategies aligned with the Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) model.