본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of Perception Difference in R&D Planning and Evaluation Following Characteristics of Convergence Researcher: Focused on Humanities, Social Sciences, and Science and Technology Majors and Areas

김대환
융합연구학회 (The Society for Transdisciplinary Studies)|2018.06|The Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies|제2권 제1호|pp. 5-28

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

HumanitiesSocial SciencesPerception DifferenceR&D Planning and EvaluationCharacteristics of Convergence Researcherand Science and Technology Majors
주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study focuses on the differences of the researchers’ perception in the process of convergence research. In particular, it is assumed that the gap between the researchers in the implementation and evaluation stages has a significant influence on the stage of finding a theme for convergence research. Specific details are as follows. First, we examine the heterogeneity between disciplines through the conceptual definition of concepts and types of convergence research by reviewing previous studies related to convergence research. Second, we analyze differences in the researchers’ perceptions about obstacles that occur in the convergence research process. Third, the factors for promoting convergence research will be derived through this process, and future convergence research directions will be presented. Fourth, we intend to emphasize the importance of cooperation and interest among researchers by presenting appropriate directions for the planning, performance and evaluation of convergence research.

Abstract

This study focuses on the differences of the researchers’ perception in the process of convergence research. In particular, it is assumed that the gap between the researchers in the implementation and evaluation stages has a significant influence on the stage of finding a theme for convergence research. Specific details are as follows. First, we examine the heterogeneity between disciplines through the conceptual definition of concepts and types of convergence research by reviewing previous studies related to convergence research. Second, we analyze differences in the researchers’ perceptions about obstacles that occur in the convergence research process. Third, the factors for promoting convergence research will be derived through this process, and future convergence research directions will be presented. Fourth, we intend to emphasize the importance of cooperation and interest among researchers by presenting appropriate directions for the planning, performance and evaluation of convergence research.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Babchuk, N., "Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines : A comparative trend analysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciences", The American Sociologist, 30(3), pp.5~21 (1999)
  2. Cho, H. S., "A Joint Research Network of Scientists and Engineers : Focused on Gender Comparison", Korean Sociology, 36, pp.119~158 (2005)
  3. Choi, S. I., "Impact of the Corporate Convergence Competence on Management Performance", Digital Convergence Research, 13(1), pp.177~184 (2015)
  4. Choi, S. H., "Understanding and Facilitation of Corporate Innovation Based on Humanities and Technology Convergence", STEPI Insight, 180, pp.6~18 (2015)
  5. Choi, Y. K., "Communication and Convergence of Science and Technology, Humanities and Social Science, Culture and the Arts", Science and Technology Policy, 175, pp.40~46 (2009)
  6. Crane, D., "Social Networks", pp.161~178 (1977)
  7. Huh, J. H., "Issues and Tasks for Enhancing National R&D Productivity", Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference, pp.413~421 (2007)
  8. Hwang, G. S., "Qualitative Research on Convergence Research Process in Science and Technology Fields for Efficient Discussion of Convergence Research Policy", Korea Policy Review, 24(4), pp.191~217 (2015)
  9. Hwang, H. R., "Analysis and Challenges of Non Pursuit Innovation Behavior in Public Research", Journal of the Association of Technological Innovation, 14(2), pp.157~176 (2011)
  10. Hwang, H. R., "Theoretical Orientation and Tasks of Non Pursuit Research", Research on Technological Innovation, 20(1) (2011)
  11. Hwang, S. W., "Measures and Indicators of R&D Efficiency by Business Type under Standard Business Classification", Science and Technology Policy, 169, pp.102~115 (2008)
  12. Kim, I. S., "From Imitation to Innovation" (2000), Sigma Insight
  13. 김지은, "국내 중소기업의 기술인문융합 현황분석", 대한산업공학회지, 40(5), pp.451~461 (2014), 대한산업공학회[DOI]
  14. Kim, Y. H., "An Analysis of Productivity and Efficiency of R&D in Korea: Focused on Comparison with OECD Countries", 19(1), pp.1~27 (2011)
  15. Korea Social Science Council, "Convergence Research: Theory and Practice" (2003), Beopmunsa
  16. Kwon, K. H., "An Analysis of Large Scale Research Facilities and Equipment Evaluation Model for Enhancing Science and Technology Competitiveness", Journal of the Association of Technological Innovation, 10(1), pp.121~142 (2007)
  17. Lee, C. J., "The Concept and Measurement Method of R&D Productivity", Science and Technology Policy, 89, pp.28~39 (1996)
  18. Lee, J. M., "An Analysis of Social Network for Collaborative Research of Convergence Technology Experts", Journal of the Korean Society of Contents, 10(6), pp.415~428 (2010)
  19. International Science and Technology Policy Network Expansion Plan via International Cooperation, "Lee, M. J.", Korea Institute of Science and Technology Policy, ~ (2009)
  20. Lee, S. K., "A Study on the Change of Other Government Roles in Open Ended Innovation and Technological Development", PhD, pp.2013
  21. Lim, J. M., "A Study on the Efficient Use of National Large Scale Research Facilities", Spring Conference of the Industrial Engineering Society of Korea, pp.1947~1952 (2014)
  22. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, "Results of 2013 National Research Facilities Equipment Survey and Comprehensive Measures for Efficient Use", Presidential Advisory Council on Science and Technology Council conference materials (2013)
  23. Moody, J., "The structure of a social science collaboration network : Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999", American sociological review, 69(2), pp.213~238 (2004)
  24. Newman, M. E., "The structure of scientific collaboration networks", Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 98(2), pp.404~409 (2001)
  25. Park, S. E., "Normative Humanities and Technical Humanities", Humanities Research, 47, pp.543~566 (2004)
  26. Park, S. M., "Two Stage DEA", AR-I Performance Evaluation Model for R&D Project Efficiency Correlation and Business Positioning Research, 2010, pp.83, 3285~3303
  27. Park, Y. C., "Research Methodology" (2015), Daeyoung Culture
  28. Pinto, J. K., "Critical factors in project implementation : a comparison of construction and R&D projects", Technovation, 9(1), pp.49~62 (1989)
  29. 신열, "연구개발사업의 평가와 예산배분간 관계분석:2005-2007년 특정연구과제 사례를 중심으로", 정책분석평가학회보, 18(2), pp.151~173 (2008), 한국정책분석평가학회[DOI]
  30. A Study on the Utilization of Policy Evaluation Results, "Song, H. J.", Sungkyunkwan University School of Public Administration, ~ (2005)
  31. Song, W. J., "Characteristics of Humanities and Social Science and Science and Technology Convergence Research of Social Problem Solving Type and Directions for Development", Technological Innovation Research, 20(3), pp.129~151
  32. Song, W. J., "Analysis of Technology Non Pursut Technological Innovation Characteristics of Technology Intensive SMEs", Technology Innovation Research, 17(1), pp.49~67 (2009)
  33. Song, W. J., "Technological and Economic Uncertainty and Response in the Aftermath of Pursuit: Development of Conceptual Framework", Science and Technology Research, 7(1) (2007)
  34. Science and Technology for the Solution of Social Problems: Convergence of Humanities and Social Science, "Song, W. J.", Korea Institute of Science and Technology Policy, ~ (2011)
  35. Swink, M., "Six Sigma adoption: Operating performance impacts and contextual drivers of success", Journal of Operations Management, 30(6), pp.437~453 (2012)
  36. Thursby, J. G., "Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing", Research policy, 31(1), pp.109~124 (2002)
  37. Yeom, D. K., "Derivation of Factors for the Improvement of Registration Process and Perception Survey for Efficient Utilization of National Research Facility Equipment", Journal of the Association of Technological Innovation, 17(4), pp.733~762 (2014)
  38. Yoo, S. C., "A Study on the Leading Factors of Utilizing Public Research Facilities: Focusing on Service Quality, User Satisfaction, Reuse and Recommendation Intention of RFID", USN Comprehensive Support Center, 2010, pp.35(2), 37~51

관련 논문AI추천

A Study on the Facilitation of the Humanities and Social Science Based Convergence Research노영희, 정대근융합연구학회 · The Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies2018 · 제2권 제2호Suggestion of Policy through Analysing Performance of Humanities and Social Science based Interdisciplinary Convergence Research노영희, 이광희, 정대근융합연구학회 · The Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies2018 · 제2권 제1호다의적 융합 개념의 이해를 통한 과학기술과 인문사회 간 융합연구 촉진방안고명철사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회 · 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지2017 · 제7권 제1호학제간 융합연구의 정책적 지원 방향이태종한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2014 · 제18권 제3호인문사회기반 융합연구 정책 방향노영희, 이상엽한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2021 · 제25권 제4호A Study on the General Center for Convergence Research Satisfaction of Humanities and Social Sciences-based Convergence Researchers김진희, 노영희융합연구학회 · The Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies2022 · 제6권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

The Characteristics of Uncovered Medical Service Expenses for Frequent Main Diagnoses among the Elderly Patients김광환, 이무식, 임효남, 이수정pp. 29-44Relationship Between Academic Stress and College Life Adaptation for Dental Hygiene Students: Focus on Self-efficacy, Burnout, Social Support오지연, 장종화pp. 45-58The Relationships Between Migration-related Stress and Vascular Hemodynamic Factors Based on Migration Duration이창호, 김지희, 박민현, 조윤*pp. 59-67Suggestion of Policy through Analysing Performance of Humanities and Social Science based Interdisciplinary Convergence Research노영희, 정대근, 이광희pp. 69-97
원문 보기