An Analysis of the Writing Tasks in Textbooks for Japanese University Students
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzes writing tasks in academic writing textbooks for Japanese university students, focusing on the organization and difficulty of these tasks based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). A total of 411 writing tasks from 30 textbooks were coded by two experienced Japanese English teachers. The author identified 13 tasks that appeared most frequently for further analysis. The study involved 208 Japanese university students who completed these 13 tasks without the use of dictionaries. The same two teachers then evaluated the students’ written responses. The aggregate scores from the analytical assessments were examined using Rasch analysis to determine task difficulty. The findings indicated that textbooks for Japanese university students emphasize rhetorical functions such as explanation and narration, while showing limited integration of other language skills. Textbooks should aim to achieve a more comprehensive balance, aligning better with the CEFR framework. By examining how textbooks sequence rhetorical functions and their alignment with task difficulty, the study aims to provide insights for developing more effective teaching materials.
Abstract
This paper analyzes writing tasks in academic writing textbooks for Japanese university students, focusing on the organization and difficulty of these tasks based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). A total of 411 writing tasks from 30 textbooks were coded by two experienced Japanese English teachers. The author identified 13 tasks that appeared most frequently for further analysis. The study involved 208 Japanese university students who completed these 13 tasks without the use of dictionaries. The same two teachers then evaluated the students’ written responses. The aggregate scores from the analytical assessments were examined using Rasch analysis to determine task difficulty. The findings indicated that textbooks for Japanese university students emphasize rhetorical functions such as explanation and narration, while showing limited integration of other language skills. Textbooks should aim to achieve a more comprehensive balance, aligning better with the CEFR framework. By examining how textbooks sequence rhetorical functions and their alignment with task difficulty, the study aims to provide insights for developing more effective teaching materials.
참고문헌 (31)
- Bond, T. G., "Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences" (2015), Routledge
- Chen, A., "A critical evaluation of text difficulty development in ELT textbook series: A corpus-based approach using variability neighbor clustering", System, 58, pp.64~81 (2016)
- Council of Europe, "Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Creswell, J., "Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches" (2013), SAGE
- Egusa, C, "Analysis of ESL textbooks for junior and senior high schools", Research Bulletin of English Teaching: Hokkaido Branch, 5, pp.27~49 (2008)
- Fujimura-Wilson, K., "A study on the instruction on the use of hedging in English academic writing textbooks", Jacet International Convention Selected Papers, 8, pp.85~112 (2022)
- Ghorbani, M., "Quantification and graphic representation of EFL textbook evaluation results", Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), pp.511~520 (2011)
- Green, A., "The measurement of modern language books", The Modern Language Journal, 10(5), pp.259~269 (1926)
- Harding, J., "Qualitative data analysis from start to finish" (2013), SAGE
- Harwood, N., "What can we learn from mainstream education textbook research?", RELC Journal, 48(2), pp.264~277 (2017)
- Hutchinson, T., "Interface: English for technical communication" (1984), Longman
- Little, D., "The common European framework of reference for languages : Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact", Language Teaching, 39(3), pp.167~190 (2006)
- Little, D., "The common European framework of reference for languages : A research agenda", Language Teaching, 44(3), pp.381~393 (2011)
- Littlejohn, A., "Materials development in language teaching", pp.190~216 (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Miles, M. B., "Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook" (2014), SAGE
- Mori, A., "The possibility to use the textbook explicitly explaining English grammar", The Journal of Liberal Arts, 7, pp.147~167 (2011)
- Nagai, N., "The actual and potential impacts of the CEFR on language education in Japan", Synergies Europe, (6), pp.141~152 (2011)
- Negishi, M., "Reflecting on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages and its Companion Volume", pp.10~22 (2020), Multilingual Matters
- Newby, D., "European portfolio for student teachers of languages – A reflection tool for languages teacher education (ECML)" (2007), Council of Europe Bookshop
- North, B. J., "The educational and social impact of the CEFR", Language testing matters: Investigating the wider social and educational impact of assessment – proceedings of the ALTE Cambridge conference, pp.357~377 (2009), UCLES[DOI]
- Runnels, J., "Using the Rasch model to validate a multiple choice English achievement test", International Journal of Language Studies, 6(4), pp.141~153 (2012)
- Satake, Y., "A corpus-driven vocabulary analysis of authorized English textbooks for high schools and the English examinations for entrance to Japanese universities", Journal of Informatics, 2, pp.78~84 (2013)
- Schmidt, M. S., "Can do statements in language education in Japan and beyond" (2010), Asahi Press
- Shizuka, T, (2007), Kansai University Publisher
- Sugitani, M., "The common European framework of reference:The globalization of language education policy", pp.198~221 (2012), Multilingual Matters
- Tomlinson, B, "English language learning materials: A critical review" (2008), Continuum
- Tomlinson, B., "Materials development in language teaching" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Verhave, T., "The principles of textbook analysis", Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(5), pp.641~649 (1968)
- Wen-Cheng, W., "Thinking of the textbook in the ESL", EFL classroom, 2011, pp.4(2), 91~96
- Wright, B. D., "Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model", Journal of Educational Measurement, 14(2), pp.97~116 (1977)