본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

비사(秘史) 백제부흥군 전쟁의 역사적 평가와 의의

Historical Assessment and Meaning of Grieved History, Baekje Restoration Forces’ Warfare

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류군사학

초록

This study is to re-analyse the patriotism and meaning of the Baekje people to restore their national Buyeo identities, history and culture sustained over about 700 years. It attempts to have a guideline for the future strategic alternatives based upon the analysis of the current status and historical lessons. Specially, with 1,350 years of history passed since the collapse of the Baekje Dynasty, the inquiries are related to how we are going to see the Baekje restoration force and treat those who devoted their lives for the dynasty. This paper is to provide the meanings for the future degenerations on the basis of contemporary perspectives with historical lessons drawn from the restoration force. This inquiry, more specifically, looks at the intention and background of supportive relations among the restoration force, Goguryeo and Wae, Tang’s military operations that made Goguryeo passive, and Wae’s active dispatch of massive troops through their struggling processes. It’s traits are in the perspectives from the restoration movement as well as historical and military views on the war history. Academic contributions of it include the view points promoted by looking at the changing currents of the international military strategy and Northeast Asian regional and diplomatic situations of the 7th century based on the war history of Sabi Castle, Imzon Castle, Churyu Castle, and Baekgang Battles. Problems of the study on the Baekje restoration force reside in the absence of accurate historical archives, historical views from the movement and political perspectives and resultive interpretations consistent on the restoration force, Thus, it is important not to repeat the wrongful mistakes from the history via ceaseless, thorough and self-reflective criticisms with objective visions on the domestic and international phenomena. In conclusion, this paper contends that we need to foremost prepare the future based on the past history and lessons from it and sublimate the sacrifice of the Baekje restoration force into the memorial service of their loyal spirits consoling the deaths on the battlefield and recognizing patriotism.

Abstract

This study is to re-analyse the patriotism and meaning of the Baekje people to restore their national Buyeo identities, history and culture sustained over about 700 years. It attempts to have a guideline for the future strategic alternatives based upon the analysis of the current status and historical lessons. Specially, with 1,350 years of history passed since the collapse of the Baekje Dynasty, the inquiries are related to how we are going to see the Baekje restoration force and treat those who devoted their lives for the dynasty. This paper is to provide the meanings for the future degenerations on the basis of contemporary perspectives with historical lessons drawn from the restoration force. This inquiry, more specifically, looks at the intention and background of supportive relations among the restoration force, Goguryeo and Wae, Tang’s military operations that made Goguryeo passive, and Wae’s active dispatch of massive troops through their struggling processes. It’s traits are in the perspectives from the restoration movement as well as historical and military views on the war history. Academic contributions of it include the view points promoted by looking at the changing currents of the international military strategy and Northeast Asian regional and diplomatic situations of the 7th century based on the war history of Sabi Castle, Imzon Castle, Churyu Castle, and Baekgang Battles. Problems of the study on the Baekje restoration force reside in the absence of accurate historical archives, historical views from the movement and political perspectives and resultive interpretations consistent on the restoration force, Thus, it is important not to repeat the wrongful mistakes from the history via ceaseless, thorough and self-reflective criticisms with objective visions on the domestic and international phenomena. In conclusion, this paper contends that we need to foremost prepare the future based on the past history and lessons from it and sublimate the sacrifice of the Baekje restoration force into the memorial service of their loyal spirits consoling the deaths on the battlefield and recognizing patriotism.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 노중국, "백제부흥운동 이야기" (2005), 주류성
  2. 문소영, "못난 조선" (2013), 나남
  3. 신채호, "역주 조선상고사 하" (1983), 형성출사
  4. 이기동, "백제의 역사" (2006), 주류성
  5. "구당서", ~
  6. "삼국사기", ~
  7. "일본서기", ~
  8. "자치통감", ~
  9. 김수태, "웅진도독부의 백제부흥운동 재론- 664년 사비산성 전투를 중심으로 -", 백제학보, (25), pp.89~112 (2018), 백제학회[DOI]
  10. 김주성, "熊津都督府의 地理的 位置와 性格", 백제연구, (56), pp.137~154 (2012), 백제연구소[DOI]
  11. 성주탁, "백제승 도침의 사상 배경과 부흥활동", 역사와 담론 (1992)
  12. 심정보, "백제부흥군의 주요거에 한 연구", 백제연구, 14 (1983)
  13. 이남석, "산 수산성의 황과 특징", 백제문화, 28 (1999)
  14. 이도학, "심포지움 1 : 백제부흥운동과 백강 ; 백제 조국회복전쟁기의 몇 가지 쟁점 검토", 백제문화, (32), pp.149~157 (2003), 백제문화연구소
  15. 이종학, "주류성·백강의 위치 비정에 관하여", 군사, (52), pp.161~191 (2004), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  16. 이재준, "백제 부흥군의 백제부성 포위공격과 웅진강구 전투", 군사연구, (142), pp.7~35 (2016), 육군군사연구소[DOI]
  17. 충청남도역사문화연구원, "백제의 멸망과 부흥운동", 百濟文化史大系 硏究叢書, 6 (2007)
  18. Edward H., "Carr. What Is History?" (1987), Penguin Books
  19. "네이버블로그"[URL]
  20. "다음블로그"[URL]
  21. "박노자"[URL]
  22. "서영교"[URL]
  23. "위키백과 백강전투"[URL]
  24. "위키백과 백강투"[URL]
  25. "한국민족문화백과사전 기벌포전투"[URL]
  26. "한국민족문화백과사 백제부흥운동"[URL]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)