Cost and Profit Efficiency of Banks: Stochastic Frontier Analysis vs Data Envelopment Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study compares the most widely used parametric and non-parametric techniques to measure cost and profit efficiency of banks, namely the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). We formulate the specification form of both stochastic cost and profit frontier models and constant return to scale Cost DEA and Profit DEA models and provide an empirical assessment of the cost and profit frontiers based on a panel dataset of National Commercial Banks (NCBs) and Private Banks (PBs) in Bangladesh over the 2001-2010 period. The cost inefficiency and profit efficiency are slightly higher for PBs than NCBs in case of both SFA and DEA. The coefficients of advance and off-balance sheet items are significant that positively influence the banks in stochastic cost frontier model while the advance, other earning assets, price of borrowed fund are significant and negative effects on the banks in stochastic profit frontier model. The average cost inefficiency and average profit efficiency are recorded with 16.3% and 91% respectively. The highest and lowest cost inefficiency are observed for Janata Bank and United Commercial Bank Limited whilst the highest and lowest profit efficiency are recorded forEastern Bank Limited and Janata Bank respectively. The average technical and allocative efficiency are 68.8% and 35.9%, respectively in case of CRS cost-DEA model whereas they are 70.3% and 31.8% in case of CRS profit-DEA model. The average cost inefficiency is recorded 6.3% by SFA whereas it is 24.5% by DEA. The average profit efficiency is found 91% by SFA while it is 22.1% by DEA, and SFA method shows better bank efficiency than DEA.
Abstract
This study compares the most widely used parametric and non-parametric techniques to measure cost and profit efficiency of banks, namely the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). We formulate the specification form of both stochastic cost and profit frontier models and constant return to scale Cost DEA and Profit DEA models and provide an empirical assessment of the cost and profit frontiers based on a panel dataset of National Commercial Banks (NCBs) and Private Banks (PBs) in Bangladesh over the 2001-2010 period. The cost inefficiency and profit efficiency are slightly higher for PBs than NCBs in case of both SFA and DEA. The coefficients of advance and off-balance sheet items are significant that positively influence the banks in stochastic cost frontier model while the advance, other earning assets, price of borrowed fund are significant and negative effects on the banks in stochastic profit frontier model. The average cost inefficiency and average profit efficiency are recorded with 16.3% and 91% respectively. The highest and lowest cost inefficiency are observed for Janata Bank and United Commercial Bank Limited whilst the highest and lowest profit efficiency are recorded forEastern Bank Limited and Janata Bank respectively. The average technical and allocative efficiency are 68.8% and 35.9%, respectively in case of CRS cost-DEA model whereas they are 70.3% and 31.8% in case of CRS profit-DEA model. The average cost inefficiency is recorded 6.3% by SFA whereas it is 24.5% by DEA. The average profit efficiency is found 91% by SFA while it is 22.1% by DEA, and SFA method shows better bank efficiency than DEA.
참고문헌 (31)
- Aigner, D., "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models", Journal of Econometrics, 6, pp.21~37 (1977)
- Akinloye, O. A., "Estimating Profit Efficiency in the South African Mining Sector using Stochastic Frontier Approach", Problems and Perspectives in Management, 8(1), pp.136~142 (2010)
- Baten M. A., "Stochastic Frontier Model for Cost and Profit Efficiency of Islamic Online Banks", Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 19(1), pp.1~17 (2014)
- Baten, M. A., "A Stochastic Frontier Model on Measuring Online Bank Profit Efficiency", South African Journal of Business Management, 42(3), pp.49~59 (2011)
- Battese, G., "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data", Empirical Economics, 20, pp.325~332 (1995)
- Berger, A. N., "Inside the black box : What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions", Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, pp.895~947 (1997)
- Berger, A. N., "Efficiency of financial institutions : International survey and directions for future research", European Journal of Operational Research, 98, pp.175~212 (1997)
- Berger, D. Hancock, "Bank Efficiency Derived from the Profit Function", Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, pp.317~347 (1993)
- Cost and Profit Efficiency of Banks in Haiti: Do Domestic Banks Perform Better than Foreign Banks?, "Cadet, R. L.", ~, pp.MPRA Paper No. 11953 (2008)
- Canhoto, A., "A Note on Banking Efficiency in Portugal, New vs. Old Banks", Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(11), pp.2087~2098 (2003)
- Carbo, S., "Efficiency in Banking : Empirical Evidence from the Savings Banks Sector", The Manchester School, 70, pp.204~228 (2002)
- Charnes, A. Cooper, "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp.429~444 (1978)
- Coelli, T., "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis" (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Delis, Manthos D, , Applied Financial Economics, 19, pp.191~202 (2009)
- Dacanay, S. J. O., "Profit and Cost Efficiency of Philippine Commercial Banks under Periods of Liberalization, Crisis and Consolidation", The Business Review, 7, pp.315~322 (2007)
- The informativeness of Stochastic Frontier and Programming Frontier Efficiency Scores: Cost Efficiency and Other Measures of 20 Bank Holding Company Performance, "Eisenbeis, R.", Federal Reserve Bank of Atlant, ~, pp.Working Paper, No. 99-23 (1999)
- Farrell, M. J., "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120(3), pp.253~290 (1957)
- Ferrier, G., "Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking : Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence", Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp.229~245 (1990)
- Huang, T. H., "Comparison of Economic Efficiency Estimation Methods : Parametric and Non-parametric Techniques", Manchester School, 70, pp.682~709 (2002)
- Kumbhakar, S. C., "Production Risk, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data", Economics Letters, 41, pp.11~26 (1993)
- Lozano-Vivas, A., "Profit Efficiency for Spanish Savings Banks", European Journal of Operational Research, 98, pp.381~394 (1997)
- Maudos, J., "Cost and Profit Efficiency in Banking : An International Comparison of Europe, Japan, and the USA", Applied Economics Letters, 8, pp.383~387 (2001)
- Maudos, J., "Cost and Profit Efficiency in European Banks, Journal of International Financial Markets", Institutions and Money, 12, pp.33~58 (2002)
- Meeusen, W., "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Function with Composed Error", International Economic Review, 18, pp.435~444 (1977)
- Resti, A., "Evaluating the Cost-efficiency of the Italian Banking System : What can be Learned from the Joint Application of Parametric and Nonparametric Techniques", Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, pp.221~250 (1997)
- Rogers, K. E., "Non-traditional Activities and the Efficiency of U. S. Commercial Banks", Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, pp.467~482 (1998)
- Rahman, M. M., "Stochastic Frontier Approach to Estimate Branch-wise Cost and Profit Efficiency of Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited", Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 7(2), pp.45~70 (2011)
- Tahir, M., "Cost and Profit Efficiency of the Malaysian Commercial Banks : A Comparison between Domestic and Foreign Banks", International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2, pp.186~197 (2010)
- Vu, H., "Cost and Profit Efficiencies of Australian Banks and the Impact of the Global Financial Crisis Economic Record", Economic Record, 87, pp.525~536 (2011)
- Vander V. R., "Cost and Profit Efficiency of Financial Conglomerates and Universal Banks in Europe", Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 34(1), pp.254~282 (2002)
- Explaining Bank Failures: Deposit Insurance, Regulation, and Efficiency, "Wheelock", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, ~ (1993)