본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Government Support Mechanisms and Open Innovation: An Empirical Look at Korean Manufacturing Firms

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine how a broad palette of government support measures and firms' membership in government-developed clusters are related to firms' openness in innovation processes. Design/methodology/approach - Empirically, this study analyzes the Korea Innovation Survey 2018 data on the innovation activities of 1,450 Korean R&D-active manufacturing firms in a three-year period from 2015 through 2017. Findings - The results suggest that firms engage in open innovation to a greater extent--as measured by the breadth of external collaborating partners and of the utilized external sources of knowledge--when they are provided with a broader palette of government support measures and are located in government-developed clusters. However, the effect of diverse government support measures is attenuated for firms located in these clusters. Research implications or Originality - This study contributes to the innovation literature by illuminating how firms' open innovation can be understood in a national innovation system. Moreover, it provides valuable implications for firms seeking to obtain government support and collaborate with others.

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine how a broad palette of government support measures and firms' membership in government-developed clusters are related to firms' openness in innovation processes. Design/methodology/approach - Empirically, this study analyzes the Korea Innovation Survey 2018 data on the innovation activities of 1,450 Korean R&D-active manufacturing firms in a three-year period from 2015 through 2017. Findings - The results suggest that firms engage in open innovation to a greater extent--as measured by the breadth of external collaborating partners and of the utilized external sources of knowledge--when they are provided with a broader palette of government support measures and are located in government-developed clusters. However, the effect of diverse government support measures is attenuated for firms located in these clusters. Research implications or Originality - This study contributes to the innovation literature by illuminating how firms' open innovation can be understood in a national innovation system. Moreover, it provides valuable implications for firms seeking to obtain government support and collaborate with others.

참고문헌 (89)

  1. Almeida, P., "The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation", Small Business Economics, 9, pp.21~31 (1997)
  2. Alvarez, S. A., "How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliance with large partner", Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), pp.139~148 (2001)
  3. Amit, R, "Why do venture capital firms exist?", Journal of Business Venturing, 13, pp.441~466
  4. Anselin, L., "Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations", Journal of Urban Economics, 42, pp.422~448 (1997)
  5. Arrow, K., "The rate and direction of inventive activity" (1962), Princeton University Press
  6. Arundel, A., "Handbook of innovation indicators and measurement" (2013), Edward Elgar Publishing
  7. Asheim, B. T., "Location, agglomeration and innovation : Towards regional innovation systems in Norway?", European Planning Studies, 5(3), pp.299~330 (1997)
  8. Audretsch, D., "Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation and production", American Economic Review, 86(3), pp.630~640 (1996)
  9. Baptista, R., "Do firms in clusters innovate more?", Research Policy, 27(5), pp.525~540 (1998)
  10. Bathelt, H., "Regional competence and economic recovery : divergent growth paths in Boston's high technology economy", Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13(4), pp.287~314 (2001)
  11. Bathelt, H., "Clusters and knowledge : Local buzz, global pipelines, and the process of knowledge creation", Progress in Human Geography, 28, pp.31~56 (2004)
  12. Bertoni, F., "Does governmental venture capital spur invention and innovation? Evidence from young European biotech companies", Research Policy, 44, pp.925~935 (2015)
  13. Bogers, M., "Strategic management of open innovation : A dynamic capabilities perspective", California Management Review, 62(1), pp.77~94 (2019)
  14. Brander, J. A., "The effects of government-sponsored venture capital : International evidence", Review of Finance, 19, pp.571~618 (2015)
  15. Breschi, S., "Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks : an anatomy of localized knowledge flows", Journal of Economic Geography, 9, pp.439~468 (2009)
  16. Bruton, G. D., "State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations", Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), pp.92~114 (2015)
  17. Chesbrough, H., "Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape" (2006), Harvard Business School Publishing
  18. Cho, D. -S., "Latecomer strategies : Evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea", Organization Science, 9(4), pp.489~505 (1998)
  19. 최은영, "정부지원제도 및 내부R&D투자와 R&D협력이 기술혁신성과에 미치는 영향", 산업경제연구, 28(4), pp.1473~1492 (2015), 한국산업경제학회
  20. Christensen, J. F., "The industrial dynamics of open innovation-Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics", Research Policy, 34(10), pp.1533~1549 (2005)
  21. Chung, S., "Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems", Technovation, 22(8), pp.485~491 (2002)
  22. Do companies benefit from public research organizations? the impact of the Fraunhofer Society in Germany, "Comin, D", ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research, ~, pp.ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 19-006 (2019)
  23. Cooke, P., "Regional innovation systems : Competitive regulation in the new Europe", Geoforum, 23(3), pp.365~382 (1992)
  24. Cooke, P., "Regional innovation systems : Institutional and organizational dimensions", Research Policy, 26(4-5), pp.475~491 (1997)
  25. "Making sense of clusters: Regional competitiveness and economic development" (2006)[URL]
  26. Crafts, N., "A perspective on UK productivity performance", Fiscal Studies, 22(3), pp.271~306 (2001)
  27. Dahlin, K. B., "Team diversity and information use", Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), pp.1107~1123 (2005)
  28. Delgado, M., "Defining clusters of related industries", Journal of Economic Geography, 16, pp.1~38 (2016)
  29. Du, J., "Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners", Research Policy, 43(5), pp.828~840 (2014)
  30. Franco, M., "Inter-clustering as a network of knowledge and learning : Multiple case studies", Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(1), pp.39~49 (2020)
  31. Freeman, C., "Technology and Economic Theory" (1988), Pinter
  32. Gentile-L?decke, S., "Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs?", Small Business Economics, 55, pp.1091~1112 (2020)
  33. Goerzen, A., "Small firm boundary-spanning via bridging ties : Achieving international connectivity via cross-border inter-cluster alliances", Journal of International Management, 24, pp.153~164 (2018)
  34. Grilli, L., "Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms", Research Policy, 43, pp.1523~1543 (2014)
  35. Grimpe, C., "Search patterns and absorptive capacity : Low-and high-technology sectors in European countries", Research Policy, 38, pp.495~506 (2009)
  36. Hall, B. H., "The financing of research and development", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), pp.35~51 (2002)
  37. Patents, innovation, and development, "Hall, B. H.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper #27203 (2020)
  38. Hall, B. H., "The impact of international patent systems : Evidence from accession to the European Patent Convention", Research Policy, 48, pp.103810~ (2019)
  39. Hoff, K., "Beyond Rosenstein-Rodan: The modern theory of coordination problems in development", Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, pp.177~182 (2000)
  40. Hoffman, L. R., "Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), pp.401~407 (1961)
  41. Howells, J., "Innovation Systems in a Global Economy" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  42. Howells, J. R. L., "Tacit knowledge, innovation, and economic geography", Urban Studies, 39, pp.871~884 (2002)
  43. H?yss?, M., "The coevolution of social and physical infrastructure for biotechnology innovation in Turku, Finland", Research Policy, 33, pp.769~785 (2004)
  44. Huizingh, K. R. E., "Open innovation : State of the art and future perspectives", Technovation, 31, pp.2~9 (2011)
  45. Hulsheger, U. R., "Team-level predictors of innovation at work : A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research", Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), pp.1128~1145 (2009)
  46. Inkpen, A. C., "Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer", Academy of Management Review, 30(1), pp.146~165 (2005)
  47. Jaffe, A. B., "Geographic localization and knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp.577~598 (1993)
  48. Jones, B. F., "The burden of knowledge and the"Death of the Renaissance Man" : Is innovation getting harder?", Review of Economic Studies, 76, pp.283~317 (2009)
  49. Kim, J., "Government roles in evaluation and arrangement of R&D consortia", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 88, pp.202~215 (2014)
  50. Kim, S., "How knowledge flow affects Korean ICT manufacturing firm performance : a focus on open innovation strategy", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(10), pp.1167~1181 (2016)
  51. Laursen, K., "Open for innovation : The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U. K. manufacturing firms", Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp.131~150 (2006)
  52. Laursen, K., "The paradox of openness : Appropriability, external search and collaboration", Research Policy, 43, pp.867~878 (2014)
  53. Leckel, A., "Local open innovation : A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 153, pp.119891~ (2020)
  54. 이윤, "DEA와 Malmquist 생산성지수를 이용한 한국의 주요 국가산업단지 운영 효율성 분석", 한국지역개발학회지, 23(5), pp.95~118 (2011), 한국지역개발학회
  55. 이선제, "혁신클러스터 내에서의 혁신주체들간 상호작용의 변화: 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 17(4), pp.820~844 (2014), 한국기술혁신학회
  56. Lee, J., "Research and development linkages in a national innovation system : Factors affecting success and failure in Korea", Technovation, 26, pp.1045~1054 (2006)
  57. Leiponen, A., "Innovation opportunities, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth", Strategic Management Journal, 31, pp.224~236 (2010)
  58. Leiponen, A., "Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation", Organization Science, 22(3), pp.641~658 (2011)
  59. The government as venture capitalist : The long-run impact of the SBIR program, "Lerner, J.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper #5753 (1996)
  60. Li, J., "On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance : Theory and evidence from Chinese firms", Strategic Management Journal, 39, pp.193~216 (2018)
  61. Lichtenthaler, U., "External commercialization of knowledge : Review and research agenda", International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), pp.231~255 (2005)
  62. Lichtenthaler, U., "Open innovation in practice : An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), pp.148~157 (2008)
  63. Link, A. N., "Government as entrepreneur : Evaluating the commercialization success of SBIR projects", Research Policy, 39, pp.589~601 (2010)
  64. Love, J. H., "Learning from openness : the dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages", Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), pp.1703~1716 (2013)
  65. Lundvall, B. -A., "Technology and Economic Theory" (1988), Pinter
  66. Mahmood, I. P., "Government's Dilemma : The role of government in imitation and innovation", Academy of Management Review, 30(2), pp.338~360 (2005)
  67. Marshall, A., "Principles of Economics" (1920), MacMillan
  68. Min, S., "The effect of innovation network size and public R&D investment on regional innovation efficiency", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 155, pp.119998~ (2020)
  69. Murphy, K. M., "Industrialization and the big push", Journal of Political Economy, 97, pp.1003~1026 (1989)
  70. Musacchio, A., "New varieties of state capitalism : Strategic and governance implications", Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), pp.115~131 (2015)
  71. Nakamura, M., "Cooperative R&D and the Canadian forest products industry", Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, pp.147~169 (2003)
  72. Nelson, R. R., "National innovation systems : A comparative analysis" (1993), Oxford University Press
  73. North, D., "Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  74. Papke, L. E., "Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k)plan participation rates", Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, pp.619~632 (1996)
  75. Porter, M. E., "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" (1990), Free Press
  76. Porter, M. E., "Clusters and new economics of competition", Harvard Business Review, pp.77~90 (1998)
  77. Porter, M. E., "The economic performance of regions", Regional Studies, 37, pp.549~578 (2003)
  78. Rodrik, D., "Coordination failures and government policy : A model with application to East Asia and Eastern Europe", Journal of International Economics, 40, pp.1~22 (1996)
  79. Rosenthal, S. S., "Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics" (2004), Elsevier North-Holland
  80. Singh, J., "Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs : Myth or reality?", Management Science, 56(1), pp.41~56 (2010)
  81. Son, S. C., "Do R&D resources affect open innovation strategies in SMEs: the mediating effect of R&D openness on the relationship between R&D resources and firm performance in South Korea's innovation clusters", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management (2021)
  82. Teece, D. J., "Profiting from technological innovation : Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy", Research Policy, 15(6), pp.285~305 (1986)
  83. "The Industrial Sites and Development Act, Article 2" (2018)[URL]
  84. Wang, C. -H., "The effect of inbound open innovation on firm performance : Evidence from high-tech industry", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, pp.222~230 (2015)
  85. Williamson, O. E., "Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications" (1975), Free Press
  86. Williamson, O. E., "The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting" (1985), Free Press
  87. Wu, J., "National innovation system, social entrepreneurship, and rural economic growth in China", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 121, pp.238~250 (2017)
  88. Wuchty, S., "The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge", Science, 316, pp.1036~1039 (2007)
  89. Zobel, A. -K., "Implications of open innovation for organizational boundaries and the governance of contractual relations", Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), pp.400~423 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)