본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of Perceived Control upon Role Performances among Healthcare Service Customers

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine whether a psychological concept enhances healthcare users’ service experience. Specifically, the study proposes and empirically examines a model of perceived control in which the user’s sense of control is postulated as exerting positive influences upon his/her motivation, self-efficacy associated with his/her role as a patient, and satisfaction with his/her medical service experience. Methodology - Data were collected by a professional research company, using an online survey method. Participants of the study included adults nineteen years or older who had visited a medical service institute at least once during the previous one-year period. For the test of the research hypotheses, structural equation modeling using AMOS was used. Findings - Findings of this study denote a unique insight into the users’ comprehension of medical service experiences and their behaviors. First, the concept of perceived control is identified as a factor that enhances the quality of individuals’ medical service experiences. A sense of control directly influences medical users’ self-efficacy to comply with doctor’s recommendations, their motivation to comply with doctor’s recommendations, and their satisfaction with the medical service experience. Second, one’s perceived self-efficacy is found to exert positive influences upon both motivation and satisfaction. Third, one’s motivation to comply with the doctor’s recommendation is found to exert a positive influence upon one’s satisfaction. Additionally, perceived control is found to exert an indirect influence upon medical service users’ satisfaction through the mediation of both self-efficacy and motivation. Research Implications - The findings of the study support the notion that perception of control among medial service users enhances their service experience as patients. The main thrust of this study suggests that it is necessary for healthcare practitioners to consider implementing service encounter strategies that purposefully enhance the sense of control among their patients. The identification of significant inter-relationships among perceived control, motivation, self-efficacy, and satisfaction among

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine whether a psychological concept enhances healthcare users’ service experience. Specifically, the study proposes and empirically examines a model of perceived control in which the user’s sense of control is postulated as exerting positive influences upon his/her motivation, self-efficacy associated with his/her role as a patient, and satisfaction with his/her medical service experience. Methodology - Data were collected by a professional research company, using an online survey method. Participants of the study included adults nineteen years or older who had visited a medical service institute at least once during the previous one-year period. For the test of the research hypotheses, structural equation modeling using AMOS was used. Findings - Findings of this study denote a unique insight into the users’ comprehension of medical service experiences and their behaviors. First, the concept of perceived control is identified as a factor that enhances the quality of individuals’ medical service experiences. A sense of control directly influences medical users’ self-efficacy to comply with doctor’s recommendations, their motivation to comply with doctor’s recommendations, and their satisfaction with the medical service experience. Second, one’s perceived self-efficacy is found to exert positive influences upon both motivation and satisfaction. Third, one’s motivation to comply with the doctor’s recommendation is found to exert a positive influence upon one’s satisfaction. Additionally, perceived control is found to exert an indirect influence upon medical service users’ satisfaction through the mediation of both self-efficacy and motivation. Research Implications - The findings of the study support the notion that perception of control among medial service users enhances their service experience as patients. The main thrust of this study suggests that it is necessary for healthcare practitioners to consider implementing service encounter strategies that purposefully enhance the sense of control among their patients. The identification of significant inter-relationships among perceived control, motivation, self-efficacy, and satisfaction among

참고문헌 (62)

  1. Anderson, J. C., "Structural equation modeling in practice : A review and recommended two-step approach", Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411~423 (1988)
  2. Arasli, H., "Gearing service quality into public and private hospitals in small islands : Empirical evidence from Cyprus", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 21(1), pp.8~23 (2008)
  3. Austin, J. T., "Goal constructs in psychology : Structure, process, and content", Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), pp.338~375 (1996)
  4. Averill, J. R., "Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress", Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), pp.286~303 (1973)
  5. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy : Toward a unifying theory of behavior change", Psychological Review, 84(4), pp.191~215 (1977)
  6. Bandura, A., "Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory", Psychology and Health, 13(4), pp.623~649 (1998)
  7. Bandura, A., "Social cognitive theory : An agentic perspective", Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), pp.1~26 (2000)
  8. Bandura, A., "Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), pp.586~598 (1981)
  9. Bayton, J. A., "Motivation, cognition, learning - basic factors in consumer behavior", Journal of Marketing, 22, pp.282~290 (1958)
  10. Becker, L., "Customer experience : fundamental premises and implications for research", Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), pp.630~648 (2020)
  11. Bienstock, C. C., "Measuring involvement with the service : A further investigation of scale validity and dimensionality", Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(3), pp.209~221 (2006)
  12. Bendapudi, N. M., "Patients' perspectives on ideal physician behaviors", Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81(3), pp.338~344 (2006)
  13. Blau, P., "Exchange and power in social life" (1964), John Wiley & Sons
  14. Boulding, K., "Three faces of power" (1989), Sage Publications
  15. Bruner, G. C., "Marketing scale handbook: A compilation of multi-item measures. Vol 1" (1994), American Marketing Association
  16. Byrne, S. K., "Healthcare avoidance : A critical review", Holistic Nursing Practice, 22(3), pp.280~292 (2008)
  17. Chang, C., "Choice, perceived control, and customer satisfaction : The psychology of online service recovery", CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(3), pp.321~328 (2008)
  18. Conway, M., "Judging others’ emotions as a function of the others’status", Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(3), pp.291~305 (1999)
  19. Copeland, J., "Prophecies of Power : Motivational Implications of Social Power for Behavioral Confirmation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), pp.264~277 (1994)
  20. Cronin, J. J., "Measuring service quality : A reexamination and extension", Journal of Marketing, 56(3), pp.55~68 (1992)
  21. Dellande, S., "Gaining compliance and losing weight : The role of the service provider in health care services", Journal of Marketing, 68(3), pp.78~91 (2004)
  22. Diehl, K., "Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction", Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), pp.312~322 (2010)
  23. Eleuch, A., "Healthcare service quality perception in Japan", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 24(6), pp.417~429 (2011)
  24. Ford, R., "Creating customer-focused health care organizations", Health Care Management Review, 25(4), pp.18~33 (2000)
  25. Goldstein, D., "Control theory applied to stress management", Advances in Psychology, 62, pp.481~491 (1989)
  26. Gotlieb, J., "Consumer satisfaction and perceived quality : Complementary or divergent constructs", Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), pp.875~885 (1994)
  27. Guo, L., "The role of perceived control in customer value cocreation and service recovery evaluation", Journal of Service Research, 19(1), pp.39~56 (2016)
  28. Hair, J., "Multivariate data analysis" (2006), Pearson Prentice Hall
  29. Hui, M., "Perceived control and the effects of crowing and consumer choice on service experience", Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), pp.174~184 (1991)
  30. Jewell, R. D., "The moderating effect of perceived control on motivation to engage in deliberative processing", Psychology and Marketing, 22(9), pp.751~769 (2005)
  31. Kolodinsky, J., "Complaints, redress, and subsequent purchases of medical services by dissatisfied consumers", Journal of Consumer Policy, 16(2), pp.193~214 (1993)
  32. Langer, E., "The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged : A field experiment in an institutional setting", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2), pp.951~955 (1976)
  33. Lee, J., "Perceived power imbalance and customer dissatisfaction", The Service Industries Journal, 30(7), pp.1113~1137 (2010)
  34. Lee, J., "Effects of personal control on adoption of self-service technology innovations", Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), pp.553~572 (2002)
  35. Lemon, K., "Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey", Journal of Marketing, 80(6), pp.69~96 (2016)
  36. Lian, O., ""I’m not the doctor; I’m just the patient" : Patient agency and shared decision-making in naturally occurring primary care consultations", Patient Education and Counseling, 105(7), pp.1996~2004 (2022)
  37. Lim, P., "A study of patients’ expectations and satisfaction in Singapore hospitals", International Journal of Health care Quality Assurance, 13(7), pp.290~299 (2000)
  38. Litt, M. D., "Self-efficacy and perceived control : Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), pp.149~160 (1988)
  39. MacInnis, D. J., "Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads", Journal of Marketing, 55, pp.32~53 (1991)
  40. Macho, S., "Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models : The phantom model approach", Psychological Methods, 16(1), pp.34~43 (2011)
  41. Millenson, M. L., "New roles and rules for patient-centered care", Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29, pp.979~980 (2014)
  42. Mogliner, C., "The mere categorization effect : How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction", Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), pp.202~215 (2008)
  43. Molina, Y., "Medical mistrust and patient satisfaction with mammography: The mediating effects of perceived self-efficacy among navigated African American women", Health Expectations, 18, pp.2941~2950 (2014)
  44. Parasuraman, A., "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research", Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall), pp.41~50 (1985)
  45. Park, C. W., "Research in consumer behavior(Vol. 1)" (1985), JAI Press
  46. Pieterse, A. H., "Shared decision-making – much studied, much still unknown", Patient Education and Counseling, 102(11), pp.946~1948 (2019)
  47. Powers, W. T., "Commentary on Bandura’s"human agency", American Psychologist, 46(2), pp.151~153 (1991)
  48. Reubin, D. B., "Physician implementation of and patient adherence to recommendations from comprehensive geriatric assessment", American Journal of Medicine, 100(4), pp.444~451 (1996)
  49. Rodin, J., "Advances in Environmental Psychology: Volume 2. Applications of Personal Control" (1980), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  50. Schat, A., "Effects of perceived control on the outcomes of workplace aggression and violence", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), pp.386~402 (2000)
  51. Skinner, E., "A guide to constructs of control", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), pp.549~570 (1996)
  52. Stajkovic, A. D., "Self-efficacy and work-related performance : A meta analysis", Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), pp.240~261 (1998)
  53. Stevens, L., "Motivated impressions of a powerholder : Accuracy under task dependency and misperception under evaluation dependency", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), pp.907~922 (2000)
  54. Tetrick, L. E., "Understanding, prediction, and control as moderators of the relationships between perceived stress, satisfaction, and psychological well-being", Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), pp.538~543 (1987)
  55. Thomas, E., "Beyond rationality : Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine", Social Science & Medicine, 277, pp.113900~ (2021)
  56. Thompson, S., "Perceptions of control in vulnerable populations", Journal of Social Issues, 47(4), pp.1~21 (1991)
  57. Vancouver, J. B., "Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), pp.506~516 (2002)
  58. Wall, T., "The demands-control of job strain : A more specific test", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(2), pp.153~166 (1996)
  59. Ward, J., "Control and affect : The influence of feeling in control of the retail environment on affect, involvement, attitude, and behavior", Journal of Business Research, 54(2), pp.139~144 (2001)
  60. White, R., "Motivation reconsidered : The concept of competence", Psychological Review, 66(5), pp.297~333 (1959)
  61. Wilmot, W., "Interpersonal conflict" (2001), McGraw-Hill Higher Education
  62. Zandbelt, L. C., "Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: Does physicians’ patient-centered communication matter?", Patient Education and Counseling, 65(3), pp.396~406 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)