본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

配當財源規制에 대한 法的 考察

A Legal Study on the Dividend Financial Resources Regulation

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Our Commercial Code has had strict Dividend Financial Resources Regulation for creditor protection. A company is eligible to have a profit dividend within the capital or deducted a certain amount from net assets on the balance sheet. A company creditor has the right to ask for the return of any illegal dividend to the company. In this case, a stockholder has to return unjust enrichment to the company regardless of good or bad intention. A company creditor can also impose liability of reparation on directors who are involved in an illegal dividend. Our commercial code is based on original cost in valuing net assets, that is in accordance with the standard of Dividend Financial Resources Regulation for creditor protection. However, it is not clear if a dividend in kind is acceptable as profit dividend pattern besides cash. Today, the capital system including the Dividend financial Resources Regulation has lost its function for creditor protection. It could be a solution to make Dividend Financial Resources Regulation easier that is shown in the case of foreign countries. For instance, the capital system can use capital surplus reserve as Dividend Financial Resources Regulation by easing the legal reserve. A stockholder with good faith has to be exempted from the duty of returning illegal dividend back to company. It is necessary to have more specific extent to divide those who are involved in an illegal dividend. Unrealized holding gains and losses should be included in Dividend Financial Resources according to corporate accounting rules. Besides, stock that can be marked on the balance sheet should be acceptable as dividend in kind. This can be seen as an investment in kind for corporate restructuring and financial affairs structure improvement.

Abstract

Our Commercial Code has had strict Dividend Financial Resources Regulation for creditor protection. A company is eligible to have a profit dividend within the capital or deducted a certain amount from net assets on the balance sheet. A company creditor has the right to ask for the return of any illegal dividend to the company. In this case, a stockholder has to return unjust enrichment to the company regardless of good or bad intention. A company creditor can also impose liability of reparation on directors who are involved in an illegal dividend. Our commercial code is based on original cost in valuing net assets, that is in accordance with the standard of Dividend Financial Resources Regulation for creditor protection. However, it is not clear if a dividend in kind is acceptable as profit dividend pattern besides cash. Today, the capital system including the Dividend financial Resources Regulation has lost its function for creditor protection. It could be a solution to make Dividend Financial Resources Regulation easier that is shown in the case of foreign countries. For instance, the capital system can use capital surplus reserve as Dividend Financial Resources Regulation by easing the legal reserve. A stockholder with good faith has to be exempted from the duty of returning illegal dividend back to company. It is necessary to have more specific extent to divide those who are involved in an illegal dividend. Unrealized holding gains and losses should be included in Dividend Financial Resources according to corporate accounting rules. Besides, stock that can be marked on the balance sheet should be acceptable as dividend in kind. This can be seen as an investment in kind for corporate restructuring and financial affairs structure improvement.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. "2008.10월 금융감독원이 국회 정무위원회 신학용 의원에게 제출한 자료", ~ (2008)
  2. 최준선, "회사법 (제2판)", pp.641~ (2006)
  3. "증권거래법 제191조의3 제1항", ~
  4. 최준선, "주식회사 자본제도 개선방안 연구" (2006), 한국상장회사협의회
  5. 안수현, "기업회계", 21세기 회사법 개정의 논리-2006년 법무부 상법개정작업 기초실무 자료(기업재무편), 262~ (2007)
  6. 최도성, "한국기업 배당정책의 변화", pp.21~ (2005), 서울대학교출판부
  7. 투자자보호 강화를 위한 증시제도 개선방안-상장법인의 배당제도 개선, 한국증권거래소 용역보고서, "김건식", 한국증권법학회, 21~ (2002)
  8. 회사법 개정방향에 관한 연구, "최준선", 한국상장회사협의회, 191~ (2004)
  9. "주식회사의 외부감사에 관한 법률", 기업회계기준 제91조는, ~
  10. "기업회계기준서 제21호, 재무제표의 작성과 표시Ⅰ", 2006. 2. 6 회계기준위원회 의결, 문단 71, 문단 72, ~ (2006)
  11. "기업회계기준 제68조 제3항", ~
  12. "기업회계기준 제70조 제2항", ~
  13. "기업회계기준서 제15호「지분법」", 2004. 2. 13 회계기준위원회 의결, 문단 16, ~ (2004)
  14. 송종준, "주식회사 회계규정의 개정과 과제", 기업법연구, 20(4)통권 : 27, pp.71~92 (2006), 한국기업법학회
  15. 김건식, "21세기 회사법 개정의 논리-2006년 법무부 상법개정작업 기초실무 자료(기업재무편)", ~ (2006)
  16. "부록1 법무부 회사법개정위원회 전체 회의자료(제2소위원회)", 391~ (2007)
  17. ABA, "Model Business Corporation Act Official Text with Official Comment and Statutory Cross-References Revised through June 2005", 6~60 (2005)
  18. 윤영신, "자본제도", 21세기 회사법 개정의 논리-2006년 법무부 상법개정작업 기초실무 자료(기업재무편), 190~ (2007)
  19. 김건식, "준비금제도, 자기주식취득, 이익소각", 21세기 회사법 개정의 논리- 2006년 법무부 상법개정작업 기초실무 자료(기업재무편), 408~ (2006)
  20. 小林 量, "ドイツとフランスにおける資本制度", 商事法務, (1601), pp.28~ (2001)
  21. 阿多博文, "資本および法定準備金に關する改正と實務の對應, 最新 會社法をめぐる理論と實務", 新日本法規, pp.468~ (2003)
  22. "개정전 일본상법 제284조의2 제2항, 제288조의2 제1항 제1호", ~
  23. 安藤英義, "商法における資本制度の搖らぎと「資本の部」の表示", 會計, 162(2), pp.9~ (2002)
  24. 武田降二, "資本槪念の變化と企業モデル", 稅經通信, 59(1), pp.19~ (2004)
  25. 相宅哲, "會社法制定の經緯と槪要", ジュリスト, (1295), pp.14~ (2005)
  26. "商事法務", 2005, 7~
  27. "「회사계산규칙」제186조 제2항", ~
  28. 왕순모, "법정준비금의 과도적립현상을 시정하기 위한 입법론적 고찰", 상사법연구, 14(1), pp.326~327 (1995)
  29. 손영화, "상법상 자본제도의 개선방안", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.351~402 (2006), 한국상사법학회
  30. 박종복, "주식회사의 법정준비금제도에 관한 연구", 석사
  31. 박정우, "상법상 계산제도의 개선에 관한 연구 -적법한 배당이익 한도산정을 중심으로", pp.108~ (2001)
  32. 양동석, "주식회사 자본관련제도 개선에 관한연구", 기업법연구, 21(3)통권 : 30, pp.157~184 (2007), 한국기업법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)