의결권행사를 위한 주주간 계약의 고찰
A Study on the Shareholders’ Agreements for Voting
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Shareholders’ agreements means that they are the various agreements entered into between shareholders to ensure the supremacy of shareholders for the company’s policy decision, they are aimed at vouch shareholders’ agreements on voting, give the opportunity to exert influence for management of the company to minority shareholders and protect the rights of minority shareholders from improper exercise of majority shareholders takeover. The target of a shareholders’ agreements varies depending on the circumstances of each company. Especially, Matters relating to the voting rights of shareholders is about fundamental rights of shareholders, our current 「Commercial Code」 prescribes agency event of voting, there are no provision of voting agreements and voting trust to be regulated by U.S. State Act, so there has been a discussion of whether the practical need for legislation in the current 「Commercial Code」 is or not. But, Though revised 「Commercial Code」 of 2011 prescribed issuance of kinds of stocks and of stocks in voting rights is not or limited, but prescribed matters relating to the exercise of various voting,it was a reaffirmed amendment of the existing position to denied a collective exercise of voting rights due to shareholders’ agreements. But It is an undeniable fact that practical necessity for unified voting exercise as shareholders’ agreements is great in Korea’s corporate governance, and even if the contract was recognized, if there are not regulations such as U.S. State Act, because it causes problems to cannot claim contractual effect about company, but claim contractual effect between contracting parties, it is necessary to introduce shareholders’ agreements in the our 「Commercial Code」. Therefore, I would like to discussed in the need for legislation in this paper.
Abstract
Shareholders’ agreements means that they are the various agreements entered into between shareholders to ensure the supremacy of shareholders for the company’s policy decision, they are aimed at vouch shareholders’ agreements on voting, give the opportunity to exert influence for management of the company to minority shareholders and protect the rights of minority shareholders from improper exercise of majority shareholders takeover. The target of a shareholders’ agreements varies depending on the circumstances of each company. Especially, Matters relating to the voting rights of shareholders is about fundamental rights of shareholders, our current 「Commercial Code」 prescribes agency event of voting, there are no provision of voting agreements and voting trust to be regulated by U.S. State Act, so there has been a discussion of whether the practical need for legislation in the current 「Commercial Code」 is or not. But, Though revised 「Commercial Code」 of 2011 prescribed issuance of kinds of stocks and of stocks in voting rights is not or limited, but prescribed matters relating to the exercise of various voting,it was a reaffirmed amendment of the existing position to denied a collective exercise of voting rights due to shareholders’ agreements. But It is an undeniable fact that practical necessity for unified voting exercise as shareholders’ agreements is great in Korea’s corporate governance, and even if the contract was recognized, if there are not regulations such as U.S. State Act, because it causes problems to cannot claim contractual effect about company, but claim contractual effect between contracting parties, it is necessary to introduce shareholders’ agreements in the our 「Commercial Code」. Therefore, I would like to discussed in the need for legislation in this paper.
참고문헌 (25)
- 강위두, "상법강의(상) 제4전정판" (2011), 형설출판사
- 김영호, "회사법" (2004), 팔마도서
- 최병규, "회사법" (2009), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제19판)" (2011), 박영사
- 임재연, "미국회사법 수정2판" (2007), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제14판)" (2011), 박영사
- 최기원, "신회사법론 제13대정판" (2009), 박영사
- 곽관훈, "벤처기업에 있어서의 株主間 契約", 상사법연구, 22(1), pp.329~357 (2003), 한국상사법학회
- 권오성, "의결권구속계약에 관한 소고", 변호사, 38 (2008), 서울지방변호사회
- 우홍구, "의결권행사에 관한 주주간 계약", 고시연구, 17(8)통권 : 197 (1990), 고시연구사
- 윤성승, "의결권 신탁과 의결권행사 계약의 비교법적 고찰", 상사판례연구, 24(2), pp.149~180 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
- 윤호일, "위임장권유 및 의결권신탁제도", 상사법연구, 8 (1990), 한국상사법학회
- 李龍九, "美國閉鎖會社法에 관한 硏究", 박사, pp.1982
- 鄭容相, "株主總會에 관한 法的 연구 : 株主總會의 活性化 方案과 株主의 利益保護를 위한 立法論을 中心으로", 박사, 법학, pp.1990
- 정준우, "주주의 의결권 행사방법의 편의성 제고와 그 문제점", 법학연구, 13(3), pp.1~44 (2010), 법학연구소
- ABA, "Model Business Corporation Act Annotated, Vol. Ⅰ (3rd ed.)", ~ (1985)
- Brenda G. Houck, "1994 Statutory Amendments to The Delaware General Corporation", Del. J. Corp. L, 20, pp.477~ (1995)
- C. Stephen Bigler, "Delaware Update", 4-JUN. L. Today 24, ~ (1995)
- H.G. Henn, "Laws of Corporations and Other Business Enterprise(3rd ed.)" (1983), West Pub
- Joseph Jude Norton, "Adjustment and Protection of Shareholder Interests in The Closely-Held Corporation in Texas", Sw. L. J, 39, pp.781~ (1985)
- Robert C. Clark, "Corporate Law" (1986), Little, Brown and Company
- Robert W. Hamilton, "The Law of Corporations(5th ed.)" (2000), West Group
- Seth Chertok, "For Privately Held Companies, Missouri Corporate Law May Prove More Favorable than Delaware Law", J. Mo. B, 63, pp.116~ (2007)
- William S. Hochstetler, "Statutory Needs of Close Corporations-An Empirical Study: Special Close Corporation Legislation or Flexible General Corporation Law?", J. Corp. L, 10, pp.849~ (1985)
- Eckardt Götz, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 18. Aufl", ~ (1983)
