현대 계약법상 신의칙의 법규범성과 그 적용의 확장에 관한 고찰
Consideration about a Normative Nature and Application Extension of Good Faith in Modern Law of the Contract
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The classical theory of the law of contract has been developed under the principle of liberty of contract on the basis of free will of the parties involved in the contract. But, growth of industry and monetary in contemporary society give rise to centralization of capital to specific minor social classes. As a result, discrepancy in social and economical power among individuals have grown wider and wider. Specifically, behemoths and expert groups have occupied a prominent position at the expense of powerless consumers in the real contract world. The Inferior positions of parties in the contract bring about a serious imbalance with regard to the freedom of conclusion of a contract and decision contents of a contract. With these injustices in mind, the purpose of this study is to make a justification of contract contents by setting consistent limitations on the principle of free will in the contract. Because legal regulations tend to be mostly vague and abstract, however, contract disputes that occur in legal practice cannot be fully settled under the conventional contract laws. In this regard, the main theme of this study is to establish legal theories that can close the gap between positive law and the idealism of serving justice. Essential to this legal objective is the legal principle of good faith. This principle, however, tends to be extremely abstract and overgeneralize because of which this principle has been criticized for undermining legal stability. In spite of this, the principle of good faith should be applied to correct or repair imbalances if contract contents or legal regulations do not correspond to specific social justices. The principle of good faith imposes specific obligations upon the parties in contract relations. This principle levies certain collateral obligations on even the parties who are arranging to conclude contracts. As a basis for discussion and theorization in this study Professor Macneil's Relational Contract Theory is referred to and quoted.
Abstract
The classical theory of the law of contract has been developed under the principle of liberty of contract on the basis of free will of the parties involved in the contract. But, growth of industry and monetary in contemporary society give rise to centralization of capital to specific minor social classes. As a result, discrepancy in social and economical power among individuals have grown wider and wider. Specifically, behemoths and expert groups have occupied a prominent position at the expense of powerless consumers in the real contract world. The Inferior positions of parties in the contract bring about a serious imbalance with regard to the freedom of conclusion of a contract and decision contents of a contract. With these injustices in mind, the purpose of this study is to make a justification of contract contents by setting consistent limitations on the principle of free will in the contract. Because legal regulations tend to be mostly vague and abstract, however, contract disputes that occur in legal practice cannot be fully settled under the conventional contract laws. In this regard, the main theme of this study is to establish legal theories that can close the gap between positive law and the idealism of serving justice. Essential to this legal objective is the legal principle of good faith. This principle, however, tends to be extremely abstract and overgeneralize because of which this principle has been criticized for undermining legal stability. In spite of this, the principle of good faith should be applied to correct or repair imbalances if contract contents or legal regulations do not correspond to specific social justices. The principle of good faith imposes specific obligations upon the parties in contract relations. This principle levies certain collateral obligations on even the parties who are arranging to conclude contracts. As a basis for discussion and theorization in this study Professor Macneil's Relational Contract Theory is referred to and quoted.
참고문헌 (106)
- 고영남, "고전적 계약법이론의 한계에 관한 연구 -영미법상의 신뢰이론을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2000
- 고영남, "민법의 기본원리에 대한 의문", 민주법학, (11) (1996), 민주주의법학연구회
- 고영남, "영미계약법에서의 의사이론의 전통 -프리드의 학설을 중심으로", 안암법학, (12) (2001), 안암법학회
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2003), 박영사
- 권영준, "소멸시효와 신의칙", 재산법연구, 26(1), pp.1~43 (2009), 한국재산법학회
- 권오승, "계약자유와 소비자보호", 서울대학교 법학, 42(2) (2001), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 김대정, "헌법상의 공공복리와 사법", 부동산법학, 3(3) (1995), 한국부동산법학회
- 김동호, "과실책임과 손해전보의 원리", 법학논총, 27(2) (2007), 전남대학교 법률행정연구소
- 김문현, "재산권의 사회적 구속성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1988
- 고영남, "민법총칙" (2004), 한국방송대학교출판부
- 김상용, "채권각론" (2006), 법문사
- 김성태, "민법주해" (2008), 박영사
- 홍성재, "민법총칙" (2005), 도서출판 대영문화사
- 김증한, "민법총칙" (1995), 박영사
- 김형배, "채권각론《계약법》" (2001), 박영사
- 남궁술, "법규범의 발전과 판례― 프랑스민법상 ‘안전배려의무’와 ‘정보제공의무’의 발전에 있어서의 판례의 역할을 중심으로 ―", 민사법학, (28), pp.305~338 (2005), 한국민사법학회
- 남궁술, "현대계약론에 대한 새로운 접근", 재산법연구, 22(2), pp.137~181 (2005), 한국재산법학회
- 남궁술, "형평에 대하여―그 역사적 조명과 아리스토텔레스的 정리―", 법철학연구, 8(2), pp.135~170 (2005), 한국법철학회
- 박전규, "아리스토텔레스의 프로네시스" (1991), 서광사
- 朴賢晶, "프랑스 民法上 契約의 目的 - 信義則에 基한 確定의 制限 -", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.23~50 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
- 박희호, "우리나라 채무불이행책임의 본질에 관한 소고", 재산법연구, 22(3), pp.75~126 (2006), 한국재산법학회
- 백태승, "주석 민법" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 송덕수, "민법강의(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학" (2008), 이제이북스
- 양창수, (2002), 박영사
- 오원석, "UN통일매매법" (2004), 삼영사
- 윤용석, "신의칙의 재조명", 재산법연구, 20(2), pp.21~42 (2003), 한국재산법학회
- 이영준, "민법의 지도원리로서의 사적 자치-민법개정초안에 언급하여", 법조, 통권 : 527 (2000), 법조협회
- 이영준, "민법총칙" (2007), 박영사
- 이은영, "계약에 관한 법철학적 고찰-약속이론과 신뢰이론을 중심으로", 외법논집, 7 (1999), 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 고영남, "민법총칙" (2004), 한국방송대학교출판부
- 이은영, "약관규제법" (1994), 박영사
- 이재현, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약의 해석", 외법논집, (32), pp.221~262 (2008), 법학연구소
- 이재현, "약관의 개념", 비교사법, 10(1), pp.331~364 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 이재현, "약관의 규제에 관한 법률 제16조에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, 7 (1998), 경상대학교 법학연구소
- 이정, "일본 노동계약법의 성립배경 및 주된 내용·논점에 관한 연구", 외법논집, (32), pp.135~168 (2008), 법학연구소
- 이호정, "계약자유에 관한 소고", 경제논집, 12(2) (1973), 서울대학교 경제연구소
- 장재현, "민법상 신뢰보호에 관한 법리 연구", 박사, pp.1990
- 장재현, "계약법의 현대적 과제" (2007), 경북대학교 출판부
- 장재현, "채권법각론" (2006), 경북대학교출판부
- 장재현, "채권법총론" (2006), 경북대학교출판부
- 정상현, "프랑스 民法上 不豫見理論과 우리 民法에의 示唆點", 민사법학, (41), pp.483~533 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 정종휴, "契約의 拘束力의 根據 -日本에서의 論議를 中心으로-", 민사법학, (37), pp.421~452 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 제러미 리프킨, "유러피언드림" (2005), 민음사
- 조르조 아감벤, "호모사케르:주권권력과 벌거벗은 생명" (2008), 새물결
- 존 롤즈, "정의론" (2003), 이학사
- 지원림, "계약정의에 관한 연구 -계약자유와의 관계를 중심으로-", 비교사법, 9(2) (2002), 한국비교사법학회
- 칼 라렌츠, "정당한 법의 원리" (2008), 박영사
- 吉田克己, "現代市民社會と民法學" (1999), 日本評論社
- 吉田邦彦, "アメリカにおける批判法思想の展開とわが民法學の行方", 民商法雜誌, 119(3) (1998)
- 內田 貴, "契約の時代-日本社會と契約法" (2000), 岩波書店
- 內田 貴, "契約の再生" (1990), 弘文堂
- 北川善太郞, "契約責任の硏究(構造論)" (1963), 有斐閣
- 森田 修, "契約責任の法學的構造" (2006), 有斐閣
- 川島武宜, "日本人の法意識" (1967), 岩波書店
- 平田勇人, "信義則とその基層にあるもの" (2006), 成文堂
- Asch, "Government and the Market Place" (1985)
- Atiyah, "Essays on Contract" (1990)
- Atiyah, "The Rise and Fall of Contract" (1979)
- Atiyah, "Atiyah’s Introduction to the Law of Contract" (2005)
- Birks, "Restitution and the Freedom of Contract" (1983), Current Legal Problems 36
- Borgetto, "La notion de fraternité en droit public français" (1993), LGDJ
- Brox, "Allgemeines Schuldrecht" (2004)
- Burrows, "Contract, Tort and Restitution -A Satisfactory Division or not" (1983), Law Quarterly Review 99
- Carbonnier, "Les Obligations" (2000), PUF
- Charden, "Le contrat de consommation de crédit de l’autonomie de la volonté" (1988)
- Demogue, "Traité des obligations en général" (1931)
- Dworkin, "A Matter of Principle, 1985; MacCormick, Principles of Law" (1974), Juridical Review 19
- Esser, "Grundsatz und Norm" (1956)
- Flour, "Les Obligations" (2001), t. 2, L’acte juridique
- Flume, "Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts" (1979)
- Fried, "Contract as Promise", ~ (1981)
- Ghestin, "The Pre-contractual Obligation to Disclose Information: French Report" (1989), Contract Law Today
- Gilles, "Das Gesetz über den Widerruf von Hausturgeschäften und ähnlichen Geschäften" (1986), NJW
- Gilmore, "The Death of Contract" (1974)
- Gordley, "The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine" (1991)
- Gordon, "Economics for Consumers" (1972)
- Hedemann, "Die Flucht in die Generalklauseln" (1933)
- Hippel, "Verbraucherschutz" (1979), 2. Aufl
- Jourdain, "La bonne foi dans la formation du contrat,rapport français" (1994), Litec
- Kornhauser, "The Resurrection of Contract" (1982), Columbia Law Review 82
- Kramer, "Die “Krise” des liberalen Vertragsdenkens" (1974), des liberalen Vertragsdenkens
- Larenz, "Rechts-und Staatsphilosophie der Gegenwart" (1935), Aufl
- Larenz, "Richtiges Recht; Grundzüge einer Rechtsethik" (1979)
- Larenz, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts" (1994), Besonderer Teil
- Macneil, "Barriers to the Idea of Relational Contract, in The Complex Long-Term Contract", pp.31~ (1987), Structures & International Arbitration
- Macneil, "Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law" (1978), Northwestern University Law Review 72
- Macneil, "Economic Analysis of Contractual Relations: Its Shortfalls and the Need for a ‘Rich Classificatory Apparatus’" (1981), Northwestern University Law Review 75
- Macneil, "New Social Contract -An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations" (1980), Yale
- Macneil, "Power, Contract, and the Economic Model", Journal of Economic Issues, 14 (1980)
- Macneil, "Relational Contract Theory: Challenges And Queries" (2000), Northwestern University Law Review 94
- Macneil, "The Many Futures of Contracts, Southern California" (1974), Law Review 47
- Macneil, "Values in Contract: Internal and External" (1983), Northwestern University Law Review 78
- Medicus, "Schuldrecht Ⅰ: Allgemeiner Teil" (2004), 15. Aufl
- Onians, "The Origins of European Thought" (1954), Cambridge University Press
- Picker, "Vertragliche und deliktische Schadenshaftung" (1987), JZ
- Rawls, "A Theory of Justice" (1999), Revised Edition
- Raynaud, "Les obligations" (1962), Sirey
- Raz, "Book Review(Atiyah, Promises, Morals, and Law)" (1982), Havard Law Review 95
- Reich, "Schuldrechtliche Informationspflichten gegenüber Endverbrauchern" (1978), NJW
- Reich, "Verbraucher und Recht" (1976)
- Ross, "The Basic Work of Aristotle" (1970), Random House
- Summers, "The conceptualisation of good faith in American contract law: a general account" (2000), Good Faith in European Contract Law
- Whittaker, "Coming to terms with good faith" (2000), Good Faith in European Contract Law
- Whittaker, "Good faith in European contract law: surveying the legal landscape" (2000), Good Faith in European Contract Law
- Wieacker, "Zur rechtstheoretischen Präzisierung des §242 BGB" (1956)