한국형 NCP 이의신청 절차 구축을 위한 법제도적 개선방안 연구
Suggestions for Improving Legal System to establish Korean Model NCP Specific Instance Procedure
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 미국, 영국 등 주요국 NCP 이의신청 절차에 대한 비교와 한국 NCP 동료심사 보고서에서의 권고내용을 바탕으로 현행 한국 NCP 이의신청절차를 개선하기 위한 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 먼저 현재 한국 NCP는 위원회 형태의 구조로 되어 있으나 NCP가 보다 효율적이고 효과적으로 기능할 수 있도록 구조 개편 방안을 모색해야 할 것이다. 미국이나 영국 사례를 참고하여, NCP 조직은 전문성을 가지는 소수로 구성하되 이해당사자들이 폭넓게 참여하는 자문위원회를 두는 방향으로의 구조개편을 고려해 볼 수 있을 것이다. 둘째, 최종성명서의 권고 내용을 가능한 상세하게 기술하고, 다국적기업 가이드라인에 정통한 조정전문가를 확충해 나갈 필요성이 있다. 셋째, 이행점검 절차는 NCP가 이의신청 사건과 관련하여 최종성명서의 실효성을 강화하는 수단이 될 수 있으므로 운영규정을 개정하여 관련 내용을 포함시키는 것이 바람직할 것이다. 넷째, 최근 다양한 형태로 여러 NCP가 관련되는 이의신청 사건이 발생할 가능성이 있으므로 다른 NCP와의 협력관계를 지속적으로 구축할 필요성이 있다. 이러한 제언을 바탕으로 한국형 NCP 이의신청 절차 구축을 위한 법·제도적 개선 노력을 계속해 나가야 할 것이다.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to suggest ways to improve the current specific instance procedure of the Korean National Contact Point (NCP) based on a comparison of the specific instance procedure of major countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, and recommendations from a peer review report of the Korean NCP. Firstly, as the current Korean NCP is structured as a committee, a restructuring plan should be considered to enable the NCP to function more efficiently and effectively. Referring to the examples of the US and UK, the NCP organization could be composed of a small number of professionals, while an advisory committee could be established in which stakeholders can participate more broadly. Secondly, there is a need to provide detailed recommendations in the final statements and to strengthen the pool of mediators who are well-versed in OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Thirdly, as the follow up process to specific instance can enhance the effectiveness of the final statement in relation to the complaint, it would be desirable to revise the rules of procedure to include relevant provisions. Finally, given the possibility of various forms of specific instance handled by multiple NCPs, it is necessary to continuously build cooperative relationships with other NCPs. Based on these suggestions, continuous efforts should be made to improve specific instance procedure of the Korean NCP.
참고문헌 (28)
- "OECD 다국적기업가이드라인이행을 위한 국내연락사무소 운영규정", ~ (2018)
- "Convention on the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development", ~ (1960)
- "Leader’s Declaration G7 Summit", ~ (2015)
- "OECD Declaration and Decisions on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises", ~ (1976)
- 강준하, "분쟁해결기구로서의 국가연락사무소(NCP)의기능과 역할", 홍익법학, 19(1), pp.411~440 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 강준하, "OECD NCP 동료심사(Peer Review)에 관한 법적 고찰:한계와 개선방안", 국제경제법연구, 16(1), pp.29~50 (2018), (사)한국국제경제법학회[DOI]
- KNCP, "기업책임경영을 위한 OECD 기업실사 지침", 대한상사중재원, ~ (2018)
- BHATT, K., "OECD National Contact Points as Sites of Effective Remedy: New Expressions of the Role and Rule of Law within Market Globalization?", Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(3), pp.423~448 (2021)[DOI]
- Leyla Davarnejad, L., "In the Shadow of Soft Law: The Handling of Corporate Social Responsibility Disputes under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises", Journal of Dispute Resolution, (2) (2011)
- "OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises National Contact Point-Japanese NCP: Peer learning and review" (2012)[URL]
- "Implementing the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: the National Contact Point from 2000 to 2015" (2016)[URL]
- "Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2016" (2017)[URL]
- "Frequently Asked Questions: National Contact Points for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" (2017)[URL]
- "Structures and Procedures of National Contact Points for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" (2018)[URL]
- "Guide for National Contact Points on Coordination when handling Specific Instances, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" (2019)[URL]
- "Guide for National Contact Points on Follow Up to Specific Instances, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" (2019)[URL]
- "Guide for National Contact Points on the Initial Assessment of Specific Instances, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" (2019)[URL]
- "Guide for OECD National Contact Points on issuing Recommendations and Determinations, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" (2019)[URL]
- "OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises National Contact Point Peer Reviews: United Kingdom" (2019)[URL]
- "OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises National Contact Point Peer Reviews: United States" (2019)[URL]
- "National Contact Points for Respoinsible Business Conduct: Providing Access to Remedy: 20 Years and the Road Ahead" (2020)[URL]
- "OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises National Contact Point Peer Reviews: Korea" (2021)[URL]
- "Decision of the Council on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" (2022)[URL]
- "The State of Remedy under the OECD Guidlines : Understanding NCP cases concluded in 2018 through the lens of remedy" (2019)[URL]
- Perillo, P. S., "The Role of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the National Contact Points in Shaping the Future of Corporate Accountability", International Community Law Review, 24(1-2), pp.36~56 (2022)[DOI]
- Robinson, S., "International Obligations, State Responsibility and Judicial Review Under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Regime", Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 30(78), pp.68~81 (2014)
- Schliemann, C., "Procedural Rules for the Implementation of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises - a Public International Law Perspective", German Law Journal, 13(1), pp.51~85 (2012)[DOI]
- "Guidance UK NCP complaint handling process" (2020)[URL]