본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Public Investment in Transportation Infrastructures and Industry Performance in Portugal

4

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the effects at the industry level of public investment in transportation infrastructures in Portugal. The empirical results are based on VAR/ECM models for the Portuguese economy and for eighteen industries covering the whole spectrum of economic activity in the country. These models consider private-sector output, employment and investment as well as public investment. Empirical results at the aggregate level indicate that public investment has a positive effect on both private inputs as well as on private output and that it affects labor productivity positively. These aggregate results, however, hide a wide variety of industry-level effects. In absolute terms, the industries that benefit the most from public investment are Construction, Trade, Transportation, Finance, Real Estate, and Services. In turn, relative to their size, the industries that benefit the most are Mining, Non-Metal Products, Metal Products, Construction, Restaurants, Transportation, and Finance, and, therefore, public investment tends to shift the industry mix toward these industries. Accordingly, our empirical results suggest that although public investment has been a powerful instrument to enhance the long-term economic performance in Portugal it does so in a way that is rather unbalanced across industries.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the effects at the industry level of public investment in transportation infrastructures in Portugal. The empirical results are based on VAR/ECM models for the Portuguese economy and for eighteen industries covering the whole spectrum of economic activity in the country. These models consider private-sector output, employment and investment as well as public investment. Empirical results at the aggregate level indicate that public investment has a positive effect on both private inputs as well as on private output and that it affects labor productivity positively. These aggregate results, however, hide a wide variety of industry-level effects. In absolute terms, the industries that benefit the most from public investment are Construction, Trade, Transportation, Finance, Real Estate, and Services. In turn, relative to their size, the industries that benefit the most are Mining, Non-Metal Products, Metal Products, Construction, Restaurants, Transportation, and Finance, and, therefore, public investment tends to shift the industry mix toward these industries. Accordingly, our empirical results suggest that although public investment has been a powerful instrument to enhance the long-term economic performance in Portugal it does so in a way that is rather unbalanced across industries.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. "?Is Public Expenditure Productive?? Journal of Monetary Economics", pp.177~200 (1989)
  2. Banco de Portugal, "S?ries Longas para a Economia Portuguesa" (1997), Portugal
  3. Berndt, "?Measuring the Contribution of Public Infrastructure Capital in Sweden ? Scandinavian Journal of Economics", pp.151~168 (1991)
  4. Christiano, L., M. Eichenbaum, and C. Evans, "The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence from the Flow of Funds", 78(1), pp.16~34 (1996)
  5. Evans, "?Are Government Activities Productive? Evidence From a Panel of U ? Review of Economics and Statistics", pp.1~11 (1994)
  6. Fernald, "?How Productive is Infrastructure? Distinguishing Reality and Illusion with a Panel of US Industries" (1993)
  7. Gaspar, "The Impact of Financial Integration and Unilateral Public Transfers on Investment and Growth in EC Capital-Importing Countries", 48(1), pp.43~66 (1995)
  8. Gokirmak, "Infrastructure and Economic Performance" (1995), American University
  9. Gramlich, "? Journal of Economic Literature", pp.1177~1196 (1994)
  10. Greenstein, "Modern Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Activity: An Empirical Investigation", 4(4), pp.647~665 (1995)
  11. Holleyman, "Industry Studies of the Relationship between Highway Infrastructure Investment and Productivity", 32(1), pp.93~117 (1996)
  12. Lynde, "?Public Capital and Long-Run Costs in U", pp.880~893 (1993)
  13. Moomaw, "?Total Factor Productivity Growth in Manufacturing Further Evidence from the States ? Journal of Regional Science", pp.17~34 (1991)
  14. Munnell, "? Journal of Economic Perspectives"
  15. "?The Effects of Public Infrastructure and R&D Capital on the Cost Structure and Performance of U ? Review of Economics and Statistics", pp.22~37 (1994)
  16. Pereira, "EU Structural Transfers and Economic Performance in Portugal", 53(1), pp.53~77 (1998)
  17. "Is all Public Capital Created Equal", 82(3), pp.513~518 (2000)
  18. Pereira A.M, "Investimento P?blico em Infra-estruturas de Transporte em Portugal Continental" (2001), Portugal
  19. "Public Investment in Transportation Infrastructures and Economic Performance in Portugal", 9(2), pp.177~196 (2005)
  20. "On the Impact of Public Investment on the Performance of U.S Industries", 31(1), pp.66~90 (2003)
  21. Pereira, "Public Capital and Private Sector Performance in Spain: A Sectoral Analysis", (23), pp.371~384 (2001)
  22. ?Public Investment, "? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization", pin(i), pp.127~48 (1992)
  23. Rudebusch, "Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a VAR Make Sense", 39(4), pp.907~31 (1998)
  24. Seitz, "?Public Capital and the Demand for Private Inputs ? Journal of Public Economics", pp.287~307 (1994)
  25. Seitz H, "The Impact of Public Infrastructure Capital on Regional Manufacturing Production Costs", 29, pp.231~240 (1995)
  26. Shah, "?Dynamics of Public Infrastructure ? Review of Economics and Statistics", pp.28~36 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)