본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Legal Interpretation in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The first question when applying the principle of the rule of law is “what is law?” not in an abstract sense but in a concrete sense. Law, in a more practical and concrete sense, is the product of legal interpretation. Based on the fundamental principle of the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, legal interpretation in Korea is conducted by a number of institutions. Since, the term ‘law’ encompasses various forms of legislation from the Constitution to statutes enacted by governmental agencies in a hierarchical order, we shall look to how the hierarchy effects legal interpretation upon which we will be able to reveal the distinction between constitutional interpretation and statutory interpretation. Another distinction that will we covered with respect to the method or rather the mode of interpretation is the distinction among legislative interpretation, administrative interpretation and judicial interpretation; all which are commonly referred to as authoritative interpretation. The advance and improvement of the system of legal interpretation in Korea can be inferred from the advance of the rule of law within the litigation system. The establishment of the Constitutional Court and the increase in judicial reviews on administrative decisions denote how the dominance of the rule of law and the positive role of legal interpretation has improved both in quantity and quality.

Abstract

The first question when applying the principle of the rule of law is “what is law?” not in an abstract sense but in a concrete sense. Law, in a more practical and concrete sense, is the product of legal interpretation. Based on the fundamental principle of the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, legal interpretation in Korea is conducted by a number of institutions. Since, the term ‘law’ encompasses various forms of legislation from the Constitution to statutes enacted by governmental agencies in a hierarchical order, we shall look to how the hierarchy effects legal interpretation upon which we will be able to reveal the distinction between constitutional interpretation and statutory interpretation. Another distinction that will we covered with respect to the method or rather the mode of interpretation is the distinction among legislative interpretation, administrative interpretation and judicial interpretation; all which are commonly referred to as authoritative interpretation. The advance and improvement of the system of legal interpretation in Korea can be inferred from the advance of the rule of law within the litigation system. The establishment of the Constitutional Court and the increase in judicial reviews on administrative decisions denote how the dominance of the rule of law and the positive role of legal interpretation has improved both in quantity and quality.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. "The Constitution of Korea, Article 111", ~
  2. "Constitutional Court Act, Article 68 paragraph 2", ~
  3. "Constitutional Court Act, Article 68 paragraph 1", ~
  4. "The Constitution, Article 107(2)", ~
  5. "Administrative Procedures Act, Article 5", ~
  6. "The Constitution, Article 101(1) Judicial power shall be vested in courts composed of judges", ~
  7. Supreme Court Report on the Adjudication on the Unconstitutionality of Presidential Decrees, Municipal Rules, , ~
  8. "The Constitution, Article 130(2)", ~
  9. "The Constitution, Article 72", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)