장기기증 의사표시에 대한 민사적 제문제
Civil Issues on the Declaration of Intention of Internal Organs Donation
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
In 1999, Internal Organs, etc. Transplant Act was established in Korea. According to the Act, it is possible to take internal organs from the alive, the dead, and the brain-dead. However, the Act has the critical points at civil issues as mentioned below. To begin with, it should be scrutinized regarding minors in civil law. Article 8 of the Act stipulates a minor older than 16 may declare one's intention to donate internal organs independently, only the case of enucleation the consent shall be obtained from the legal representative. However, letting minor's declaration of intention be valid without any legal consent infringes the protective ideology of minors. Thus, the Act must be amended as the consent of minor's legal representative is mandatory for a minor to donate internal organs. The second, the Act does not regard the brain-dead as the dead, in spite of this, regarding the donation of internal organs they are treated as the very same. After one's death, one's body comes under the jurisdiction of the bereaved family, then a member of the bereaved family may donate internal organs of the dead person. Even though the Act does not accept the brain-dead as the dead, the family do not meet the hurdle to donate internal organs of the brain-dead person, and the family can declare the intention to refuse the enucleation against the brain-dead person's advance intention to donation of internal organs. These attitudes of the Act mentioned foregoing should be reexamined because these are not reasonable especially when we think about the civil law system.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강태수, "장기 등 이식에 관한 법률(안)에 대한 헌법적 고찰", 법학논집 (1998), 청주대학교 법학연구소
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2003), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (1997), 박영사
- 김민중, "뇌사환자로부터의 장기이식의 법률문제", 사법행정 (1993)
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2003), 법문사
- 김영규, "장기이식법의 주요내용과 민법상의 몇 가지 문제점", 건국법학, 7 (1999), 건국대학교 법학연구소
- 김용한, "친족상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 김주수, "민법총칙" (2002), 삼영사
- 김주수, "친족상속법, 제8판" (2007), 법문사
- 김증한, "민법총칙" (2001), 박영사
- 김찬진, "뇌사설의 타당성", 인권과 정의 (1986)
- 김학태, "뇌사와 장기이식에 관한 법철학적 연구", 외법논집, 16 (2004), 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 문채규, "뇌사의 법적 의미와 장기등이식에관한법률", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.28~744 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 백태승, "민법총칙" (2004), 법문사
- 윤형열, "민법총칙" (2005), 법영사
- 이경희, "가족법" (2008), 법원사
- 이상용, "장기이식법의 시행과 향후 전망" (2000), 형사정책연구원
- 이영준, "민법총칙" (2004), 박영사
- 임상규, "장기이식법상의 뇌사관련규정의 문제점", 형사법연구, 13 (2000), 형사법학회
- 정연철, "장기이식에 관한 헌법적 고찰 - 일본과 독일을 중심으로 -", 공법학연구, 9(2), pp.183~208 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
- 주호노, "한국장기이식법" (2008), 석필
- Charles C. Dunham IV, ""BODY PROPERTY": CHALLENGING THE ETHICAL BARRIERS IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION TO PROTECT INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY", Annals Health L., 17(Winter) (2008)
- Council of Europe, "Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine Concerning Transplantation of Organs and Tissues of Human Origin", E.T.S. N., 186 (2002)
- Daphne D.Sipes, "DOES IT MATTER WHETHER THERE IS PUBLIC POLICY OR PRESUMED CONSENT IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION?", Whittier L. Rev., 12 (1991)
- Erica Teagarden, "HUMAN TRAFFICKING: LEGAL ISSUES IN PRESUMED CONSENT LAWS", North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, (Spring) (2005)
- Maryellen Liddy, "The "New Body Snatchers": Analyzing The Effect Of Presumed consent Organ Donation Laws On Privacy, Autonomy,And Liberty", Fordham Urb. L.J., 28(Summer) (2008)
- Michelle Bourianoff Bray, "PERSONALIZING PERSONALTY: TOWARD A PROPERTY RIGHT IN HUMAN BODIES", Tex. L. Rev., 69 (1990)
- Monique C. Gorsline, "THE UNITED STATES SYSTEM OF ORGAN DONATION, THE INTERNATIONAL SOLUTION, AND THE CADAVERIC ORGAN DONOR ACT: "AND THE WINNER IS..."", Journal of Corporation Law, 20(Spring) (1995)
- 石原明, "臟器移植における承諾論", ジュリスト (1991)
- 田中整爾, "新版注釋民法(2), 總則(2)" (1991), 有斐閣
- 中山茂樹, "生體移植と患者の自己決定權", 法律時報, 79(10) (2007)