본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Teacher Research on Integrating English Reading and Writing: The Use of Intermediate Texts in an EFL Class

김선영
비교문화연구소 (Center for Cross Culture Studies)|2010.08|비교문화연구 (Cross-Cultural Studies)|제20권 |pp. 67-111|DOI 10.21049/ccs.2010.20..67

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

composing processliteracy practicesintermediate textsEFL composition classreading to write classroom
주제분류문학

초록

This paper examined the role of intermediate texts in the writing process in the context of an EFL composition class. From the tradition of teacher research, this study examined how the Korean college students in different proficiency groups created intermediate texts and used them while composing their own writing. The students produced various types of intermediate texts during the compositing process, which could serve as a basis of their writing. However, the patterns of using these intermediate texts differed widely across the proficiency groups. A writing cycle for the low proficiency group, or “surface reading-few intermediate texts-writing,” indicates that less proficient students tended to engage in reading in separation of writing practices and thus produced few intermediate texts through their literacy practices. On the other hand, the students in the higher proficiency groups revealed the more integrated pattern (i.e., purpose reading/intermediate texts/writing), indicating that they often engaged in reading with specific writing purposes, practiced reading in connection to other writing practices, and elaborated written intermediate texts produced. This study argues that, to shift our student writers to a higher level category, we as teachers need to help them engage in reading and writing practices in the way they produce and use intermediate texts appropriate to their specific writing purposes.

Abstract

This paper examined the role of intermediate texts in the writing process in the context of an EFL composition class. From the tradition of teacher research, this study examined how the Korean college students in different proficiency groups created intermediate texts and used them while composing their own writing. The students produced various types of intermediate texts during the compositing process, which could serve as a basis of their writing. However, the patterns of using these intermediate texts differed widely across the proficiency groups. A writing cycle for the low proficiency group, or “surface reading-few intermediate texts-writing,” indicates that less proficient students tended to engage in reading in separation of writing practices and thus produced few intermediate texts through their literacy practices. On the other hand, the students in the higher proficiency groups revealed the more integrated pattern (i.e., purpose reading/intermediate texts/writing), indicating that they often engaged in reading with specific writing purposes, practiced reading in connection to other writing practices, and elaborated written intermediate texts produced. This study argues that, to shift our student writers to a higher level category, we as teachers need to help them engage in reading and writing practices in the way they produce and use intermediate texts appropriate to their specific writing purposes.

참고문헌 (88)

  1. Achiba, M., "Rhetorical patterns extant in the English composition of Japanese students", JALT Journal, 5, pp.1~13 (1983)
  2. Ackerman, J. M., "Reading and writing in the academy", 박사, pp.1989
  3. Bereitet, C., "Learning about writing from reading", Written Communication, 1, pp.163~188 (1984)
  4. Bloch, J., "A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse" (1995), NY Cambridge University Press
  5. Carrell, P. L., "Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting", English for Special Purposes, 16, pp.47~60 (1997)
  6. Carrell, P. L., "Reading and writing descriptive and persuasive texts", Modern Language Journal, 75, pp.314~324 (1991)
  7. EFL, "Reading and writing for academic purposes, in : Sustained content teaching in academic ESL", pp.2000, Carson, J. G.
  8. Carson, J. G., "Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives" (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  9. Carson, J., "Writing groups: cross-cultural issues", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), pp.17~30 (1994)
  10. Collins, N. C., "The reading and writing relationship: a case for confluent instruction, Bloomington" (1990), ERIC Clearinghouse
  11. Connor, U., "Contrastive rhetoric" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  12. Conrad, S., "ESL student revision after teacher written comments: Texts, contexts, and individuals", Journal of Second Language Learning, 8, pp.147~180 (1999)
  13. paired reading project, "The literacy club: A cross-age tutoring", pp.1993, Cook, B.
  14. Crowhurst, M., "Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children", Review of Educational Research, 49, pp.222~251 (1991)
  15. Durgunoglu, A., "Literacy development in a multilingual context" (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum
  16. "Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data"[URL]
  17. Elley, W., "Acquiring literacy in a second language: the effect of book-based programs", Language Learning, 41, pp.375~411 (1991)
  18. Eskey, D., "Reading and writing as both cognitive process and social behavior, in : Reading in the composition classroom: second language perspectives" (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  19. writing relationships in adult second language learners, in : Reading in the composition classroom: second language perspectives, "Exploring reading", pp.1993, Flahive, D.
  20. Flower, L., "Literacy action, in : Compostion in the Twenty-First Century: crisis and change", pp.249~260 (1994), Southern Illinois University Press
  21. Flower, L., "The evolution of intercultural inquiry: interview with Linda Flower", Reflections on community-based writing instruction, 1(2), pp.3~4 (2000)
  22. Flower, L., "Intercultural inquiry and the transformation of service", College English, 65(2), pp.181~201 (2002)
  23. Flower, L., "Reading-to-write: exploring a cognitive and social process" (1990), Oxford University Press
  24. Freeman, D., "Doing teacher research: from inquiry to understanding" (1998), Heinle & Heinle Publishers
  25. Freedman, S. W., "Ten years of research: achievements of the national center for the study of writing and literacy (Tech. Rep, no. 1-c)" (1995), Carnegie Mellon University
  26. Gaskins, I. W., "Scaffolding the development of intelligence among children who are delayed in learning to read" (1997), Brookline
  27. Gee, J. P., "What is literacy?, in : Negotiating academic literacies: teaching and learning across languages and cultures", pp.51~59 (1998), Erlbaum
  28. Glaser, B. G., "The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research" (1967), Aldine
  29. Grabe, W., "Reading in a second language, in : The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics", pp.49~59 (2002), Oxford University Press
  30. Grabe, W., "Reading and writing relations: second language perspectives on research and practice, in : Exploring the dynamics of second language writing", pp.243~262 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  31. Hafiz, F. M., "Extensive reading and the development of language skills", ELT Journal, 43(1), pp.4~13 (1989)
  32. Hayes, J. R., "Identifyin gthe organization of writing processes, in : Cognitive processes in writing", pp.3~30 (1980), Erlbaum
  33. Hayes, J. R., "On the nature of planning in writing, in : The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications", pp.29~55 (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
  34. Hirvela, A., "Incorporating reading into EAP writing courses, in : Research perspectives on English for academic purposes", pp.330~346 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  35. Hirvela, A., "Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction" (2005), The University of Michigan Press
  36. Hu, Z., "Some linguistic differences in the written English of Chinese and Australian students", Language learning and communication, 1, pp.39~49 (1982)
  37. Johns, A., "An analysis of summary protocols of university ESL students", Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.253~271 (1990)
  38. Johns, A., "Reading and writing tasks in English for academic purposes classes: products, processes, and resources, in : Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives", pp.274~289 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  39. Kamhi-Stein, L. D., "Reading in two languages: How attitudes toward home language and beliefs about reading affect the behaviors of "underprepared" L2 college readers", TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), pp.35~71 (2003)
  40. Kennedy, M. L., "The composing processes of college students writing from sources", Written Communication, 2, pp.434~456 (1985)
  41. Kroll, B., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom" (1993), NY Cabridge University Press
  42. Lenski, S. D., "Strategic knowledge when reading in order to write", Reading Psychology, 19(3), pp.287~315 (1998)
  43. Levy, C. M., "The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
  44. Martin, J. R., "A universe of meaning-How many practices?, in : Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives", pp.269~283 (2002), Erlbaum
  45. Many, J. E., "Traversing the topical landscape: exploring students' self-directed reading-writing-research processes", Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), pp.12~55 (1996)
  46. Mcginley, W., "The role of reading and writing while composing from sources", Reading Research Quarterly, 27(3), pp.226~248 (1992)
  47. Mcginley, W., "Maniac magee and ragtime tumpie: children negotiating self and world through reading and writing", Teaching of English, 30(1), pp.75~113 (1996)
  48. Mill, G. E., "Action research: a guide for teacher researcher, Pearson Education" (2000), Upper Saddle River
  49. Moje, E. B., "I teach students, not subjects, in : Teacher-student relationships as contexts for secondary literacy", Reading Research Quarterly, 31, pp.172~195 (1996)
  50. Nelson, G., "Reading and writing: integrating cognitive and social dimensions, in : Reading in the composition classroom: second language perspectives", pp.315~330 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  51. Nelson, J., "How the writing context shapes college students' strategies for writing from sources (Tech. Rep. no. 16), Pittsburgh", 110 Cross-Cultural Studies, 20 (1988), Center for the study of writing
  52. writing connection: the strategies for teaching and learning in the secondary classroom, "Reading", pp.2005, Olson, C. B.
  53. Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative evaluation and research methods" (1990), age Publications
  54. Phillips, E. M., "How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors, Milton Keynes" (1987), Open University Press
  55. Reid, J., "Historical perspectives on writing and reading in the ESL classroom, in : Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives", pp.33~60 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  56. Ricento, T. K., "Aspects of coherence in English and Japanese expository prose", 박사, pp.1987
  57. Rinnert, C., "Differing perceptions of EFL writing among readers in Japan", The Modern Language Journal, 85, pp.189~209 (2001)
  58. Sasaki, M., "Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: an exploratory study", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, pp.259~291 (2000)
  59. Sasaki, M., "Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners' writing process, in : Studies in writing, volume 11: new directions for research in L2 writing", pp.49~80 (2002), Academic Publishers
  60. Sasaki, M., "Explanatory variables for EFL students' expository writing", Language Learning, 46, pp.137~174 (1996)
  61. Smith, F., "Joining the literacy club" (1988), Princeton University Press
  62. Smith, F., "The book of learning and forgetting" (1998), Teachers College Press
  63. Smith, F., "Understanding reading: a psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read" (2004), Erlbaum
  64. Spivey N., "Readers and writers composing from sources", Reading Research Quarterly, 24, pp.7~26 (1989)
  65. Stringer, E., "Action research in education" (2004), Merrill Prentice Hall
  66. Torrance, M., "Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: a longitudinal study", Higher Education, 39, pp.181~200 (2000)
  67. Torranee, M., "Individual differences in the writing behavior Center for the study of writing" (1988)
  68. writing connection: the strategies for teaching and learning in the secondary classroom, "Reading", pp.2005, Olson, C. B.
  69. Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative evaluation and research methods" (1990), Sage Publications
  70. Phillips, E. M., "How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors" (1987), Open University Press
  71. Reid, J., "Historical perspectives on writing and reading in the ESL classroom, in : Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives", pp.33~60 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  72. Ricento, T. K., "Aspects of coherence in English and Japanese expository prose", 박사, pp.1987
  73. Rinnert, C., "Differing perceptions of EFL writing among readers in Japan", The Modern Language Journal, 85, pp.189~209 (2001)
  74. Sasaki, M., "Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: an exploratory study", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, pp.259~291 (2000)
  75. Sasaki, M., "Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners' writing process, in : Studies in writing, volume 11: new directions for research in L2 writing", pp.49~80 (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  76. Sasaki, M., "Explanatory variables for EFL students' expository writing", Language Learning, 46, pp.137~174 (1996)
  77. Smith, F., "Joining the literacy club" (1988), Princeton University Press
  78. Smith, F., "The book of learning and forgetting, in : Understanding reading: a psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read" (2004), Erlbaum
  79. Spivey N., "Readers and writers composing from sources", Reading Research Quarterly, 24, pp.7~26 (1989)
  80. Stringer, E., "Action research in education" (2004), Merrill Prentice Hall
  81. Torrance, M., "Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: a longitudinal study", Higher Education, 39, pp.181~200 (2000)
  82. Torranee, M., "Individual differences in the writing behavior of undergraduate students", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, pp.189~199 (1999)
  83. Tudor, I., "The dynamics of the language classroom" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  84. Verhoeven, L., "Literacy and motivation: reading engagementin individuals and groups" (2001), Erlbaum
  85. WagneR, R., "Expertise in reading, in : The road to excellence", pp.189~225 (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
  86. Wellek, R., "Theory of literature" (1963), Peregrine Books
  87. Wolfr, J., "Effects of annotations on student readers and writers", Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on digital libraries (2000)
  88. Zamel, V., "Negotiating academic literacies: teaching and learning across language and cultures" (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum

관련 논문AI추천

A Study on the Model of English Reading and Writing Integration with the Use of Intermediate Texts김선영한국영어학학회 · 영어학연구2014 · 제20권 제2호읽기요약을 활용한 작문과정 연구김선영한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2022 · 제29권 제4호The Effect of Integrated Reading and Writing Tasks on the English Literacy of Korean EFL Learners김지은언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2009 · 제51호다독을 이용한 영어 읽기-쓰기 융합 연구: 중등 영어교실김선영사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2013 · 제21권 제3호L2 Writing and its Relation to Rereading Frequency and Reading Proficiency강미정언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2007 · 제42호The Effect of Integrating Reading and Writing on EFL Learners’ Writing Ability and Vocabulary Usage김재경, 문은주현대영어교육학회 · 현대영어교육2019 · 제20권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

A Longitudinal Case Study of Late Babble and Early Speech in Southern MandarinXiaoxiang Chenpp. 5-27Korean heritage students and language literacy: A qualitative approachJustin Forsyth, Julie Damronpp. 29-66“American” Ideas and South Korean Nation-Building: U.S. Influence on South Korean Education이주영pp. 113-148Conscientization and the Discursive Construction of Identity Across cultures: Using Literacy Autobiography as a Reflective and Analytical ToolRod Pedersonpp. 149-182The Dark Side of TESOL: The Hidden Costs of the Consumption of EnglishKimie Takahashi, Yukinori Watanabe, Ingrid Pillerpp. 183-201
원문 보기