중재판정의 승인과 집행
An Approval and Execution of Arbitration Award
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The reality of the country's civil dispute arbitration scheme creditors under the arbitration award is not a thing in itself can not enforce arbitration scheme is available and active elements in the major obstacle. Execution Title as against an arbitral award recognized by the court's enforcement powers granted to execution document soon so that you can apply for enforcement, but enforcement is unfair to the debtor party claims article 36 ② of arbitration referred to the court by claiming that the reason for filing a cancellation of an arbitral award based on our decision to stop receiving enforcement enforceable as a stationary adjust legislation to balance the interests of both parties are correct. In addition, the arbitral tribunal for the arbitration system based on trust, independence, speed, economy, private guarantee international Universal should include. To parties the arbitration clause in application process or arbitration hearings process and benefits should be compared to other dispute settlement and enforcement procedures have advantages. To do this, the expertise of the arbitrator, the arbitrator in order to enhance professional development training courses and complete the process or who has qualified as a lawyer to be an arbitrator and arbitration stipulated by configuring the corporate use of enhancing the public's confidence and the need to is The arbitration court also established a dedicated court with the necessary quality in the area of intervention is necessary to provide relevant legal proceedings. in the ease and adequacy and equity should be compelled. Request for Arbitration against the statute of limitations as well as stop aging reason based civil law article168 ① and be able to identify regulations will be swept away on this question.
Abstract
The reality of the country's civil dispute arbitration scheme creditors under the arbitration award is not a thing in itself can not enforce arbitration scheme is available and active elements in the major obstacle. Execution Title as against an arbitral award recognized by the court's enforcement powers granted to execution document soon so that you can apply for enforcement, but enforcement is unfair to the debtor party claims article 36 ② of arbitration referred to the court by claiming that the reason for filing a cancellation of an arbitral award based on our decision to stop receiving enforcement enforceable as a stationary adjust legislation to balance the interests of both parties are correct. In addition, the arbitral tribunal for the arbitration system based on trust, independence, speed, economy, private guarantee international Universal should include. To parties the arbitration clause in application process or arbitration hearings process and benefits should be compared to other dispute settlement and enforcement procedures have advantages. To do this, the expertise of the arbitrator, the arbitrator in order to enhance professional development training courses and complete the process or who has qualified as a lawyer to be an arbitrator and arbitration stipulated by configuring the corporate use of enhancing the public's confidence and the need to is The arbitration court also established a dedicated court with the necessary quality in the area of intervention is necessary to provide relevant legal proceedings. in the ease and adequacy and equity should be compelled. Request for Arbitration against the statute of limitations as well as stop aging reason based civil law article168 ① and be able to identify regulations will be swept away on this question.
참고문헌 (23)
- 목영준, "상사중재법" (2011), 박영사
- 양병회, "주석 중재법" (2006), 대한상사중재원
- 박두환, "민사집행법" (1996), 고시계사
- 이시윤, "민사집행법" (2009), 박영사
- 강변근, "중재판정의 취소, 승인과 집행을 둘러싼 몇가지 논쟁", 통상법률, (40) (2001)
- 강희갑, "중국의 국제상사중재규칙의 개정과 중재판정의 승인 및 집행", 중재논총 (2002), 대한상사중재원
- 김광수, "최근 북한의 국제무역중재제도에 대한 개관", 중재, (여름) (2006), 대한상사중재원
- 김홍규, "중재판정의 국적" (1979), 춘제 현승종박사화갑기념 법사상과 민사법
- 목영준, "외국중재판정의 집행거부사유인 공공질서-우리나라와 미국의 판례를 중심으로", 상사판례연구, 5 (2000)
- 박영길, "국제중재판정의 집행을 거부하기 위한 사유로서의 공서", 중재연구, 12(1), pp.3~54 (2002), 한국중재학회
- 비변호사의 중재대리에 관한 연구”, 「중재제도활성화를 위한 연구보고서, "서정일", 대한상사중재원, ~ (2001)
- 석광현, "개정중재법의 몇 가지 문제점", 중재, (298) (2000)
- 이호원, "외국중재판정의 승인과 집행", 재판자료, 34 (1986)
- 조재연, "외국중재판정에 대한 집행판결", 사법연구자료, 11 (1984)
- 한충수, "한국에 있어서의 외국중재판정 및 조정의 승인.집행", 국제사법연구, (8)
- 황병일, "국내외 중재판정의 강제집행", 중재논총 (2000), 대한상사중재원
- 허익범, "중국 중재법에 대한 최고인민법원의 사법해석 약해", 중재 (2006), 대한상사중재원
- 小林秀之, "外國仲裁判定의 承認.執行についての一考察", 判例タイムズ, (468) (1982)
- Ringgold v, "Black Entern't Television, Inc", 126 F.3d. 70 (2d Cir, ~ (1997)
- Saregama India Ltd, "v. Mosley 635 F.3d 1284", ~ (2011)
- Saregama India Ltd, "v. Tim Mosley, 687 F. Supp. 2d 1325", S.D. Fla, ~ (2009)
- Tuff 'N" Rumble Management, "Inc. v. Profile Records, Inc., 1977 WL 158364", S.D.N.Y. Apr, ~ (1997)
- –FCA 812, , 2003
