본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

WTO협정에 따른 중국환경법제의 현황과 문제점

The Environmental Legislative System of China After Its Entry into WTO

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Abstract

China’s joining the WTO means that the country will observe the WTO agreement and revamp its environmental laws in accordance with the WTO system. The WTO system specified on its establishment agreement the sustainable development as the main purpose of the optimal use of the world resources, and allowed GATT 1994, Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement (TBT), Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS), Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM), Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), and GATS provisions to be invoked, and organized Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE) within the organization, China has legislated in 1989 Environmental Protection Law and many of the administrative and local laws and regulations in the fields of antipollution, conservation of nature, and relief of natural hazards and finally built an environmental protection system: However, they were established at the early stage of China’s system transition seeking planned socialism commodity economy, which are limited to controlling the environmental pollution-antipollution. Despite its being contrary to WTO principles founded on transparent and fair game rules, revamp of the environmental law field has been in a stalemate after the country’s entry into WTO unlike other fields like trade law, foreign investment laws, and intellectual property law. However, as China recently promotes the transition from economic development first policy in the past to governing a country in accordance with law, the country is seeking to work out a new environmental legislative system that confirms to the WTO system. China’s new environmental legislative system is expanding the scope of regulations that covers from controlling environmental pollution and hazard relief to the use, management, and preservation of environment. We expect the country to break from its past posture of using the WTO’s exceptive clauses and actively participate in establishing and revising the WTO rules based on its raised national prestige as an economic trading power, thereby actively intervening in the international economic trade and environmental protection order.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 강효백, "중국법통론" (2007), 경희대학교출판사
  2. 경희대학교국제법무대학원, "국제법무학개론" (2001), 경희대학교출판사
  3. 박균성, "환경법" (2006), 박영사
  4. 박병도, "국제환경책임법론" (2007), 집문당
  5. 최승환, "국제통상법" (2006), 법영사
  6. 한국국제경제법학회, "국제경제법" (2006), 박영사
  7. 홍준형, "환경법" (2005), 박영사
  8. 呂忠梅, "環境法導論" (2008), 北京大學出版社
  9. 呂忠梅, "環境法學" (2008), 法律出版社
  10. 金瑞林, "環境法學" (2007), 北京大學出版社
  11. 徐祥民, "中國環境資源法學評論" (2008), 人民出版社
  12. 徐祥民, "中國環境資源法的産生學與發展" (2006), 科學出版社
  13. 汪 勁, "中國環境法" (2006), 北京大學出版社
  14. 李恒遠, "中國環境法治" (2008), 法律出版社
  15. 陳家貴, "2008年 中國經濟形勢分析與豫測" (2008), 社會科學文獻出版社
  16. 王明遠, "中國環境資源法的發展, 回顧與展望, 國際環境法與比較環境法論叢" (2006), 法律出版社
  17. 法律出版社法規中心, "學生常用法律手冊" (2008), 法律出版社
  18. "中國 法律法規信息系統"[URL]
  19. "中國環境保護部"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)