미국의 법학교육: 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래
Legal education in the United States: Past, Present, and Future
1
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Professional legal education at American law schools began in 1870, when Christopher Langdell initiated a legal educational reform at Harvard Law School. This change is coincided with the establishment of the New York City Bar, where a group of elite lawyers tried to limit the introduction of less qualified practitioners to the legal profession. The ideological alliance between the bar and the law school has accelerated widespread adoption of the Harvard model in American law schools: three-year postgraduate program with a case method as a distinctive pedagogic style. Since mid-20th century, American law schools have embraced interdisciplinary input from other academic disciplines to enrich the scope and perspective of legal scholarship. More recently, international aspects are increasingly being added to the law school curriculum. Korean legal educational reform, largely modeled after the American law school system, will benefit much from the American experience. The meaningful interaction between the academia and the bar is desperately needed for successful implementation of the new 'law school' system. Moreover, dogmatic legal scholarship in Korea must also embrace multi-disciplinary approaches to legal problems.
Abstract
Professional legal education at American law schools began in 1870, when Christopher Langdell initiated a legal educational reform at Harvard Law School. This change is coincided with the establishment of the New York City Bar, where a group of elite lawyers tried to limit the introduction of less qualified practitioners to the legal profession. The ideological alliance between the bar and the law school has accelerated widespread adoption of the Harvard model in American law schools: three-year postgraduate program with a case method as a distinctive pedagogic style. Since mid-20th century, American law schools have embraced interdisciplinary input from other academic disciplines to enrich the scope and perspective of legal scholarship. More recently, international aspects are increasingly being added to the law school curriculum. Korean legal educational reform, largely modeled after the American law school system, will benefit much from the American experience. The meaningful interaction between the academia and the bar is desperately needed for successful implementation of the new 'law school' system. Moreover, dogmatic legal scholarship in Korea must also embrace multi-disciplinary approaches to legal problems.
참고문헌 (36)
- 최대권, "미국사회에 있어 서의 지적 흐름에 관한 연구: 법학 교육을 중심으로" (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- 김재원, "미국의 법학교육과 변호사 윤리" (2007), 정법
- Lawrence M Friedman, "미국법의 역사", pp.395~ (2006), 청림출판
- 최봉철, "미국의 법학교육: 개혁과 현황", 성균관법학, 11, pp.385~ (1999)
- Laura Appleman, "The Rise of the Modern American Law School: How Professionalization, German Scholarship, and Legal Reform Shaped Our System of Legal Education", New England Law Review, 39, pp.251~306 (2004)
- Philip C. Kissam, "The Ideology of the Case Method", Final Examination Law School, 2001, pp.70, 137~191
- 이재협, "미국 로스쿨 교육의 특징과 교과과정", 국제법무연구, (11), pp.143~145 (2007)
- Robert B. Stevens, "Law School: Legal Education in America From the 1850s to the 1980s" (1983), University of North Carolina Press
- Appleman, "The Rise of the Modern American Law School: How Professionalization, German Scholarship, and Legal Reform Shaped Our System of Legal Education", pp.251~306
- Alfred Z. Reed, "Training for the Public Profession of the Law" (1921)
- John O. Sonsteng, "A Legal Education Renaissance: A Practical Approach for the Twenty-First Century", William Mitchell Law Review, 34, pp.328~329 (2007)
- Eli Wald, "The Rise and Fall of the WASP and Jewish Law Firms", Stanford LawReview, 60(2008), pp.1803~1866 (2008)
- 이재협, "미국 로스쿨의 학생선발방법", 법학, 47, pp.287~305 (2006), 서울대학교
- 최봉철, "법현실주의, In 미국사회의 지적 흐름", pp.3~64 (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- 김일중, "법과 경제의 접목: 경제학도가 본 진화과정, In 미국사회 의 지적 흐름", pp.175~287 (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- 한인섭, "비판법학, In 미국사회 의 지적 흐름", pp.137~174 (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- Duncan Kennedy, "Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy : A Polemic Against the System", pp.206~ (2004), New York University Press
- Tracey E. George, "An Empirical Study of Empirical Legal Scholarship: The Top Law Schools", Indiana Law Journal, 81, pp.141~161 (2006)
- Richard A. Epstein, "Faculty-Edited Law Journals", Chicago-Kent Law Review, 70, pp.87~ (1994)
- Richard A. Posner, "Against the Law Reviews: Welcome to a World Where Inexperienced Editors Make Articles About the Wrong Topics Worse", LegalAffairs, 57 (2004)
- Linda R. Crane, "Interdisciplinary Combined-Degree and Graduate Law Degree Programs: History and Trends", John Marshall Law Review, 33, pp.47~80 (1999)
- 전해정, "미국 임상법학 교육방법 이론과 실제: 가정폭력 클리닉을 중심으로", pp.29~30 (2008), 한국학술정보
- 이재협, "법의 세계화와 로펌의 성장", 외법논집, (27), pp.573~614 (2007), 법학연구소
- Robert L. Nelson, "Observations from the After the Bar Survey of the Bar Class of 2000", QLR, 24, pp.539~553 (2005)
- Robert Kagan, "American Lawyers, Legal Culture and Adversarial Legalism, In Legal Culture and the Legal Profession" (1996), Westview Press
- David Trubek, "Global Reconstructing and the Law Studies of the Internationalization of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas", Case Western Reserve Law Review, 44, pp.407~ (1994)
- 박강우, "미국 법학교육의 과거와 현재", 법과사회, (29), pp.343~371 (2005), 법과사회이론학회
- Legal Education and Professional Development-An Educational Continuum: Report of the Task Force on Law Schools and the Profession: Narrowing the Gap, "American Bar Association’s Section on Legal Education and Admissions to theBar", ~ (1992)
- Sonsteng, "A Legal Education Renaissance: A Practical Approach for the Twenty-First Century", pp.369~
- Carole Silver, "The Case of the Foreign Lawyer: Internationalizing the U.S. Legal Profession", Fordham International Law Journal, 25, pp.1039~1084 (2002)
- Richard A. Matasar, ""The Rise and Fall of American Legal Education", New YorkLaw School Law Review, 29, pp.465~504 (2004)
- "Rethinking Law School, America’s Gest Graduate Schools 2007"[URL]
- Edward Rubin, "What’s Wrong with Langdell’s Method, and What to Do About It", Vanderbilt Law Review, 60, pp.609~665 (2007)
- Todd D. Rakoff, "A Case for Another Case Method", Vanderbilt Law Review, 60, pp.597~607 (2007)
- Carole Silver, "Globalization and the Business of Law: Lessons for Legal Education", Northwestern Journal ofInternational Law and Business, 28, pp.399~414 (2008)
- 장승화, "'열린’법학과‘열린’법조계, In 법률가의 윤리와 책임", pp.507~519 (2003), 박영사