No Longer a Question of Truth?: The Knell of Scientific Bourgeois Marxian Economics and a Positive Alternative
3
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This reply to Simon Mohun and Roberto Veneziani (2009) points out that they have not addressed, much less overturned, our refutations of Veneziani’s celebrated criticisms of Marx and the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of Marx’s value theory. Instead, they have filled their “response” with non-responsive irrelevancies. We argue that they do so in order to try to divert the debate without appearing to do so. Thus, the significance of their failure to respond is that the debate is over: Marx’s critics have run out of arguments against the TSSI. The reply criticizes Mohun and Veneziani’s lack of concern to arrive at the truth and their resort to methods that do not permit inquiry to arrive at truth, and it proposes, as a posiitve alternative, some rules to guide scholarly debate.
Abstract
This reply to Simon Mohun and Roberto Veneziani (2009) points out that they have not addressed, much less overturned, our refutations of Veneziani’s celebrated criticisms of Marx and the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of Marx’s value theory. Instead, they have filled their “response” with non-responsive irrelevancies. We argue that they do so in order to try to divert the debate without appearing to do so. Thus, the significance of their failure to respond is that the debate is over: Marx’s critics have run out of arguments against the TSSI. The reply criticizes Mohun and Veneziani’s lack of concern to arrive at the truth and their resort to methods that do not permit inquiry to arrive at truth, and it proposes, as a posiitve alternative, some rules to guide scholarly debate.
참고문헌 (16)
- Freeman, A, "The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics" (2004), Edward Elgar
- Kliman,A, "A Value-theoretic Critique of the Okishio Theorem in Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics" (1996), Edward Elgar
- Kliman,A, "Simultaneous Valuation vs. the Exploitation Theory of Profit", Capital and Class, 73 (2001)
- Kliman,A, "Reclaiming Marx’s “Capital”: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency", Lexington Books (2007)
- Kliman, A, "Simultaneous valuation versus the exploitation theory of profit: A summing up", Capital and Class, 94 (2008)
- 앤드루 클리먼, "The Truthiness of Veneziani’s Critique of Marx and the TSSI", 마르크스주의 연구, 6(2), pp.335~366 (2009), 사회과학연구원
- Kliman, A, "The Transformation NonProblem and the NonTransformation Problem", Capital and Class, 35 (1988)
- McGlone, T, "One System or Two?: The transformation of values into prices of production vs. the “transformation problem.” in Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics" (1996), Edward Elgar
- Marx,K, "Postface to the Second German Edition in Capital: A critique of political economy Capital: A critique of political economy Capital: A critique of political economy Vol. 1" (1990), Penguin
- Mohun,S, "On the TSSI and the Exploitation Theory of Profit", Capital and Class, 81 (2003)
- Mohun, S, "The Incoherence of the TSSI: A reply to Kliman and Freeman", Capital and Class, 92 (2007)
- 사이먼 모훈, "The Temporal Single-System Interpretation: Underdetermination and Inconsistency", 마르크스주의 연구, 6(3), pp.277~301 (2009), 사회과학연구원
- Steedman,I, "Marx after Sraffa" (1977), New Left Books
- Marx After Sraffa and the Open Economy. Discussion Papers in Economics, "Steedman,I", Manchester Metropolitan University, ~, pp.Working Paper 2003-02 (2003)
- Dynamics, Disequilibrium, and Marxian Economics, "Veneziani, R", London School of Economics and the Università degli Studi di Siena, ~ (2002)
- Veneziani,R, "The Temporal Single-System Interpretation of Marx’s Economics: A critical evaluation", Metroeconomica, 55(1) (2004)