Research on the Geopolitical Challenges of China’s “One Belt, One Road” Initiative
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Under the new situation of geopolitical revival, the “One Belt, One Road(OBOR)” initiative has become the key to coordinating the international and domestic overall situation in the “new era”,1) setting the basic track and the direction for China’s new geopolitical strategic development path. Trump’s C5+1 in Central Asia, Putin’s Eurasian Economic Union, the EU’s “Belt and Road”, and the “Project Mausam” launched by the Modi government are related to the OBOR initiative, these strategies have also triggered geopolitical economic challenges to the OBOR initiative. Based on the OBOR initiative background, this paper analyzes the attitudes and status quo of the US, EU, Russia and India’s current participation in the OBOR initiative through the studies of the existing scholars on the OBOR initiative, thereby actively explore the implementation-changes of these strategies, and challenges that may affect their participation in the OBOR initiative. It is found that the “C5+1” and the “Project Mausam” have exclusive, targeted and speculative effects on the OBOR initiative, mutual trust is insufficient, and the parallel and competitive aspects are more obvious; Although the OBOR has achieved considerable results in the docking cooperation with the Eurasian Economic Union, they face the potential risks of geographical interest imbalance; In the implementation-changes of the EU’s “Belt and Road”, the coexistence of unstable risks and challenges: there are differences between the OBOR initiative and the “Rules” of the EU’s “Belt and Road”, the EU’s understanding of the OBOR initiative is divided, and the EU needs to maintain internal unity.
Abstract
Under the new situation of geopolitical revival, the “One Belt, One Road(OBOR)” initiative has become the key to coordinating the international and domestic overall situation in the “new era”,1) setting the basic track and the direction for China’s new geopolitical strategic development path. Trump’s C5+1 in Central Asia, Putin’s Eurasian Economic Union, the EU’s “Belt and Road”, and the “Project Mausam” launched by the Modi government are related to the OBOR initiative, these strategies have also triggered geopolitical economic challenges to the OBOR initiative. Based on the OBOR initiative background, this paper analyzes the attitudes and status quo of the US, EU, Russia and India’s current participation in the OBOR initiative through the studies of the existing scholars on the OBOR initiative, thereby actively explore the implementation-changes of these strategies, and challenges that may affect their participation in the OBOR initiative. It is found that the “C5+1” and the “Project Mausam” have exclusive, targeted and speculative effects on the OBOR initiative, mutual trust is insufficient, and the parallel and competitive aspects are more obvious; Although the OBOR has achieved considerable results in the docking cooperation with the Eurasian Economic Union, they face the potential risks of geographical interest imbalance; In the implementation-changes of the EU’s “Belt and Road”, the coexistence of unstable risks and challenges: there are differences between the OBOR initiative and the “Rules” of the EU’s “Belt and Road”, the EU’s understanding of the OBOR initiative is divided, and the EU needs to maintain internal unity.
참고문헌 (44)
- "Pivot to the Pacific” is over. senior U.S.diplomat says" (2017)[URL]
- Pillalamarri, Akhilesh, "Project Mausam: India’s Answer to China’s ‘Maritime Silk Road’", The Diplomat, ~ (2014)
- Libman, Alexander, "Linking the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Eurasian Economic Union: Mission Impossible", Caucasus International, 6(1), pp.45~ (2016)
- Ekman, Alice, "Three Years of China’s New Silk Roads: From Words to (Re)action", pp.10~ (2017), IFRI
- Leavy, Brian, "China’s ‘New Silk Road’ initiative – implications for competitors and partners, near and far", Strategy & Leadership, 46(Issue 2), pp.34~40 (2018)
- Brugie, Camille, "China’s Way: The New Silk Road", pp.4~ (2014), European Union Institute for Security Studies
- "India Wrinkle on China Silk-Jaishankar Speaks Out on Absence of Consultations" (2015)[URL]
- "Clinton Remarks at Anna Centenary Library" (2011)[URL]
- "Will India Join China’s Maritime Silk Road" (2014)[URL]
- "Chinese Takeaway: One Belt, One Road" (2014)[URL]
- "Statement before the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, and Emerging Threats" (2014)[URL]
- Indeo, Fabio, "The Concept of a “Greater Central Asia”: Perspectives of a Regional Approach", CASI Working Paper, Presented at the First Annual CASI Conference in October 2011 (2011)
- Desarnaud, Gabrielle, "Three Years of China’s New Silk Roads: From Words to (Re)action", pp.39~40 (2017), IFRI
- Junxian, Gan, "The Belt and Road Initiative for India: Walking Alone or Dancing with China", International Studies, 2015(4), pp.96~113 (2015)
- Yongfen, Gu, "Research on Economic and Trade Cooperation between China and Russia or India under One Belt One Road Initiative", pp.41~ (2016), Economic & Management Publishing
- Wilson, Jeanne L, "The Eurasian Economic Union and China’s silk road: Implications for the Russian - Chinese Relationship", European Politics and Society, 17(1), pp.115~ (2016)
- Holslag, Jonathan, "How China’s New Silk Road Threatens European Trade", The International Spectator, 52(1), pp.56~ (2017)
- Sangar. Kaneshko, "Russia and China in the age of grand Eurasian projects: Prospects for Integration between the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Eurasian Economic Union", Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1(1), pp.14~ (2017)
- Duchâtel, M, "Absorb and Conguer: An EU Approach to Russian and Chinese Integration In Eurasia", pp.15~ (2016), European Council on Foreign Relations
- "The US-China trade agreement-a huge deal for China" (2017)[URL]
- Bennett, Mia M, "The Silk Road Goes North: Russia’s Role within China’s Belt and Road Initiative", Area Development and Policy, 1(3), pp.344~ (2016)
- "European foreign policy: a new realism on China" (2019)[URL]
- Casarini, Nicola, "China’s Inroads into the West", The World Today, 71(5) (2015)
- Ploberger, Christian, "One Belt, One Road-China’s new grand strategy", Journal of Chinese Economic & Business Studies, 15(Issue 3), pp.289~305 (2017)
- "Shangri-La Security Dialogue" (2012)[URL]
- Blank, Stephen, "U.S. Interests in Central Asia and Their Challenges", Demokratizatsiya, 15(3), pp.314~ (2007)
- "Still Waters: One belt, one road and the end of a geopolitical debate" (2016)[URL]
- "“National Security Strategy of the United States of America" (2017)[URL]
- "C5+1 Fact Sheet" (2017)[URL]
- Zhou Qiang, "A review of The Belt and Road Initiative studies from the perspective of geopolitics", World Regional Studies, 27(3), pp.1~10 (2018)
- 蒋姮, "一带一路’地缘政治风险的评估与管理", 国际贸易, (8), pp.21~24 (2015)
- 陈菲, "一带一路’与印度‘季风计划’的战略对接研究", 国际展望, (6), pp.15~32 (2015)
- 陈亚州, "特朗普政府的中亚政策: 承与调整", 国际问题研究, (4), pp.82~98 (2018)
- 李秀蛟, "俄罗斯智库专家对‘一带一路’的评析", 西伯利亚研究, (3), pp.19~24 (2015)
- 翟崑, "中国经济年鉴·一带一路卷", pp.3~22 (2015), 中国经济年鉴社
- 葛汉文, "地缘政治研究的当代复兴及其中国意义", 国际展望, (2), pp.68~84 (2015)
- "一带一路’五周年回顾与展望, 中国一带一路网" (2018)[URL]
- 王湘穗, "世界发展大势与中国战略选择", 国防, (1), pp.31~36 (2016)
- 赵华胜, "后阿富汗战争时期美国中亚外交展望", 国际问题研究, (2), pp.79~95 (2014)
- 赵华胜, "中国与大欧亚伙伴关系", 国际问题研究, (6), pp.14~27 (2017)
- 王晓伟, "特朗普当选美国总统后俄罗斯对外政策走向展望", 俄罗斯东欧中亚研究, (4), pp.80~81 (2017)
- 冯传禄, "一带一路’与‘季风计划’战略对接: 有效政策选项抑或伪命题", 南亚研究, (2), pp.44~66 (2016)
- "欧版‘一带一路’应与中国对接" (2018)[URL]
- 王日华, "中国传统的国家间信任思想及其启示", 世界经济与政治, (3), pp.110~121 (2011)