논에서 호밀과 두과 사료작물 혼파에 따른 생산성 및 사료가치 비교
Dry Matter Yield and Forage Quality at Mixture of Annual Legumes and Rye on Paddy Field
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
legumes and rye on paddy field at the experimental field of Jeollanam-Do Agricultural Research and Extension Services from 2004 to 2008. The five treatments used in this experiment were rye mono (C.V. Koolgrazer),rye+chinese milk vetch mixture, rye+crimson clover (C.V. Linkarus) mixture, rye+forage pea (C.V. Austrian pea) mixture, rye+hairy vetch (C.V. Oregon Common) mixture. The dry matter (DM) percentage at harvest was 23. 0～25.3%. The DM percentage among rye single and mixture treatments were similar. The yields of fresh and crude protein (CP) were high in Italian ryegrass (IRG)+Forage pea mixtures as a 50,370 kg and 1,177 kg per ha. And the yields of dry matter were high in IRG+forage pea was at mixtures as a 12,390 kg/ha. The Av. P2O5 in IRG+forage pea mixture was 85 ㎎/㎏. In conclusion, the mixture cultivation of rye and forage pea was very effective
Abstract
legumes and rye on paddy field at the experimental field of Jeollanam-Do Agricultural Research and Extension Services from 2004 to 2008. The five treatments used in this experiment were rye mono (C.V. Koolgrazer),rye+chinese milk vetch mixture, rye+crimson clover (C.V. Linkarus) mixture, rye+forage pea (C.V. Austrian pea) mixture, rye+hairy vetch (C.V. Oregon Common) mixture. The dry matter (DM) percentage at harvest was 23. 0～25.3%. The DM percentage among rye single and mixture treatments were similar. The yields of fresh and crude protein (CP) were high in Italian ryegrass (IRG)+Forage pea mixtures as a 50,370 kg and 1,177 kg per ha. And the yields of dry matter were high in IRG+forage pea was at mixtures as a 12,390 kg/ha. The Av. P2O5 in IRG+forage pea mixture was 85 ㎎/㎏. In conclusion, the mixture cultivation of rye and forage pea was very effective
참고문헌 (18)
- AOAC, "Official methods of analysis (15th ed.)" (1990), Association of Official Analytical Chemists
- Barnes, R. F., "Forage: Vol. Ⅰ. An introduction to grassland agriculture. 5th ed" (1995), Iowa State University Press
- Getnet, A., "Effect of variety, soil type and fertilizer on the establishment, growth, forage yield, quality and voluntary intake by cattle of oats and vetches cultivated in pure stands and mixtures", Anim. Feed Sci. & Tech, 92, pp.95~111 (2001)
- Goering, H. K., "Forage fiber analysis. USDA Agric. Handbook No. 379" (1970), USDA
- Moore, R. E., "Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage", Dept. of Anim. Sci, pp.1970
- Patterson, P. E., "Dry Pea Seed. Southeastern Idaho Crop Costs and Retus" (1999), University of Idaho Cooperative Extension Service
- SAS institute, Inc, "SAS user's guide Statistics" (1999), SAS Inst
- Tilley, J. M. A., "A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops", J. Bri. Grassland Soc, 18, pp.104~111 (1963)
- 남부지역 완두 추파재매 시 검토사항, "김동관", 전남 농업기술원, ~ (2008)
- 김동암, "청예용 호밀의 수확시기가 사초의 수량과 사료 가치에 미치는 영향", 한초지, 12(2), pp.173~177 (1992)
- 김동암, "청예 사료용 연맥품종의 수량 및 사료가치 비교연구", 한초지, 13(1), pp.66~77 (1993)
- 김원호, "논에서 생육특성과 수량이 우수한 두과 사료작물 선발", 한국초지조사료학회지, 29(4), pp.307~312 (2009), 한국초지조사료학회
- 김원호, "논에서 적응성이 우수한 Forage Pea 품종 선발", 한국초지조사료학회지, 29(1), pp.7~12 (2009), 한국초지조사료학회
- 김종근, "파종방법 및 혼파비율이 호밀-헤어리베치 혼파시 사료가치 및 생산성 향상에 미치는 영향", 한국초지조사료학회지, 22(4), pp.233~240 (2002), 한국초지조사료학회
- 이광녕, "예건 및 첨가제가 호밀 사일리지의 발효특성에 미치는 영향", 한초지, 17(2), pp.187~198 (1997)
- 이병생, "호밀의 품종 및 수확시기가 사초생산성 및 품질에 미치는 영향", 한국동물자원과학회지, 46(2), pp.227~234 (2004), 한국동물자원과학회
- 이형석, "대전지역 추파 사료작물의 건물수량 및 사료가치 비교 연구", 한국초지조사료학회지, 26(4), pp.249~256 (2006), 한국초지조사료학회
- 조익환, "답리작으로 호밀과 헤어리베치의 단, 혼파 재배 시 우분뇨 및 화학비료의 시용에 따른 생산성 평가", 한국초지조사료학회지, 28(4), pp.323~330 (2008), 한국초지조사료학회