본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『滄浪詩話』의 ‘識’과 ‘別材·別趣’ 小考

A Study on 'Sik (識)' and 'Byeol Jae · Byeol Chwi (別材·別趣)' of 『Chang Rang Si Hwa (滄浪詩話)』

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

『Chang Rang Si Hwa (滄浪詩話)』 : an essay on poetry composed by Um Woo (嚴羽) in end of the Song Dynasty made a huge repercussion in the history of poetics in China. Through the work, Um Woo intended to reflect and criticize the literary men's trends of those days; which were ignoring the nature of poetry being bound by Jeong Go (典故) : an authentic precedent and Su Sa (修辭) : a figure of speech. In this study, I researched the poems created by Lee Baek (李白) and Du Bo (杜甫) in consideration of 'Sik (識)' and 'Byeol Jae · Byeol Chwi (別材·別趣)': knowledge or understanding and special quality · special style, respectively, of which concepts Um Woo presented in 『Chang Rang Si Hwa (滄浪詩話)』 · 「Si Byeon (詩辨)」. What Um Woo presented in the section of 「Si Byeon (詩辨)」 can be summarized to two opinions. First, he told that the nature of gusto of poetry was ‘Si Do Jae Myo Oh (詩道在妙悟)’ : the principles of writing a poem lie in being enlighten, and embodied it as 'I Seon Yu Si (以禪喩詩)': learning poetry through Zen, in which Zen (禪) and literature were inter-related. Second, he insisted the state of being enlighten (妙悟) about creating poetry (詩作) could be learned though the methods of 'Sik (識)' and 'Byeol Jae · Byeol Chwi (別材·別趣)' and worshipped Seong Dang Si (盛唐詩) : a style of poetry creation in Tang period. He considered Li Baek and Du Bo among High-Tang Poets as those poets who had perfectly mastered creating poetry. Um Woo tried to explain the nature of poetry by analyzing both Li Baek and Dubo, and insisted that their poems should be studied as then people learned Confucian classics in the sections of 「Si Pyeong (詩評)」 and 「Go Jeung (考證)」: poetry review and historical research, respectively. Criticizing the study trend to focus on, simply, the words and phrases (字句) and authentic precedents (典故), he emphasized the importance of appreciating the nature of poetry by presenting the concepts of 'Sik (識)' and 'Byeol Jae · Byeol Chui (別材·別趣)' in the poems of Li Baek and Du Bo. He lay stress on the importance of acquiring the nature of poetry by accumulating one's abilities to discern and judge, and, eventually, intended to explain the superb state of 'Oen Wae Ji Ui (言外之意)’ : meanings which lie beyond what's been told, through which a poet could naturally express in his poems without being bound by the knowledge existing inside of the poet.

Abstract

『Chang Rang Si Hwa (滄浪詩話)』 : an essay on poetry composed by Um Woo (嚴羽) in end of the Song Dynasty made a huge repercussion in the history of poetics in China. Through the work, Um Woo intended to reflect and criticize the literary men's trends of those days; which were ignoring the nature of poetry being bound by Jeong Go (典故) : an authentic precedent and Su Sa (修辭) : a figure of speech. In this study, I researched the poems created by Lee Baek (李白) and Du Bo (杜甫) in consideration of 'Sik (識)' and 'Byeol Jae · Byeol Chwi (別材·別趣)': knowledge or understanding and special quality · special style, respectively, of which concepts Um Woo presented in 『Chang Rang Si Hwa (滄浪詩話)』 · 「Si Byeon (詩辨)」. What Um Woo presented in the section of 「Si Byeon (詩辨)」 can be summarized to two opinions. First, he told that the nature of gusto of poetry was ‘Si Do Jae Myo Oh (詩道在妙悟)’ : the principles of writing a poem lie in being enlighten, and embodied it as 'I Seon Yu Si (以禪喩詩)': learning poetry through Zen, in which Zen (禪) and literature were inter-related. Second, he insisted the state of being enlighten (妙悟) about creating poetry (詩作) could be learned though the methods of 'Sik (識)' and 'Byeol Jae · Byeol Chwi (別材·別趣)' and worshipped Seong Dang Si (盛唐詩) : a style of poetry creation in Tang period. He considered Li Baek and Du Bo among High-Tang Poets as those poets who had perfectly mastered creating poetry. Um Woo tried to explain the nature of poetry by analyzing both Li Baek and Dubo, and insisted that their poems should be studied as then people learned Confucian classics in the sections of 「Si Pyeong (詩評)」 and 「Go Jeung (考證)」: poetry review and historical research, respectively. Criticizing the study trend to focus on, simply, the words and phrases (字句) and authentic precedents (典故), he emphasized the importance of appreciating the nature of poetry by presenting the concepts of 'Sik (識)' and 'Byeol Jae · Byeol Chui (別材·別趣)' in the poems of Li Baek and Du Bo. He lay stress on the importance of acquiring the nature of poetry by accumulating one's abilities to discern and judge, and, eventually, intended to explain the superb state of 'Oen Wae Ji Ui (言外之意)’ : meanings which lie beyond what's been told, through which a poet could naturally express in his poems without being bound by the knowledge existing inside of the poet.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 강창주, "송대반강서시파의 시론연구", 박사, pp.1992
  2. 강창구, "이백과 왕창령의 칠언절구시 비교", 대불대학교 논문집, 5 (1999)
  3. 곽소우, "창랑시화" (2001)
  4. 권영한, "이백시선집" (2002), 전원문화사
  5. 김학주, "중국문학사" (2004), 신아사
  6. 김학주, "당시선" (2003), 명문당
  7. 류성준, "중국 시화의 이해" (2006), 현학사
  8. 류성준, "중국성당 시론" (2003), 푸른 사상
  9. 배규범, "역주 창랑시화" (1997), 다운샘
  10. 吳戰壘, "중국시학의 이해" (2003), 태학사
  11. 유복실, "엄우의 시선설 연구", 석사, pp.1988
  12. 윤상림, "문학론과 선사상", 동양고전연구, 4 (1995)
  13. 이병한, "중국 고전 시학의 이해" (2000), 문학과 지성사
  14. 이병한, "중국시와 시인" (1998), 사람과 책
  15. 장기근, "두보" (2006), 석필출판사
  16. 정양역, "두보시의 이해" (1996), 이회출판사
  17. 차주환, "중국시론" (2003), 서울대학교출판부
  18. 何文煥, "歷代詩話" (2004), 중화서국
  19. 邱燮友, "新譯 唐詩三白首" (1999), 三民書局
  20. 엄우, "창랑시화 교석" (2006), 인민문화 출판사
  21. "論語 「學而」편", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)