France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: The Arms Trade with the People’s Republic of China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
This article traces the evolution of European Union-China relations in terms of arms transfer, specifically from France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. States sell arms for the reasons of security, political influence, and the pursuit of wealth; however, the motives for the arms trade conducted between these European countries and China are driven by political decisions that will increase European non-military exports to China to improve general trade conditions for European investors in China. The EU-China arms trade should be perceived as a gesture of goodwill, because even though China has a massive army and implements extensive military modernization, EU countries have decided against a large-scale arms trade with China. The EU arms trade with China remains limited due to political decisions based on the responsibility to their allies within the European Union and in terms of NATO with the United States.
Abstract
This article traces the evolution of European Union-China relations in terms of arms transfer, specifically from France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. States sell arms for the reasons of security, political influence, and the pursuit of wealth; however, the motives for the arms trade conducted between these European countries and China are driven by political decisions that will increase European non-military exports to China to improve general trade conditions for European investors in China. The EU-China arms trade should be perceived as a gesture of goodwill, because even though China has a massive army and implements extensive military modernization, EU countries have decided against a large-scale arms trade with China. The EU arms trade with China remains limited due to political decisions based on the responsibility to their allies within the European Union and in terms of NATO with the United States.
참고문헌 (41)
- Keith Krause, "Arms and the State: Patterns of Military Production and Trade", pp.13~16 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- David Gold, "The Changing Economics of the Arms Trade, In Arming the Future: A Defense Industry for the 21st Century", pp.254~255 (1999), Council on Foreign Relations Press
- "2010", 10(1)
- "2005", 12(3)
- Spencer C. Tucker, "Special Issue in Commemoration of the 60th Anniversay of the Korean War The Korean War, 1950-1953: From Maneuver to Stalemate", The Korea Journal of Defense Analysis, 22(4), pp.421~433 (2010), 한국국방연구원
- "Chinese Government, The 3rd Five-year Plan (1966-1970)"[URL]
- "At constant 1990 US dollar prices", ~
- Pobzeb Vang, "Five Principles of Chinese Foreign Policies", pp.5~6 (2008), Authorhouse
- Douglas T. Stuart, "Chinese Military Modernization: The Western Arms Connection", China Quarterly, 90, pp.253~270 (1982)
- "Chairman Hua arrives in London" (1979)[URL]
- Bates Gill, "Chinese Military Modernization and Arms Proliferation in the Asia-Pacific, In China’s Shadow Regional Perspectives on Chinese Foreign Policy and Military Development", pp.15~ (1999), RAND Corporation
- Denny Roy, "PLA Capabilities in the next decade, In Defending Taiwan: The future vision of Taiwan’s defense policy and military strategy", pp.32~ (2003), Routledge
- David Shambaugh, "Modernizing China’s Military: Progress, Problems and Prospects", pp.270~ (2003), University of California Press
- "European Council, Council of Ministers Declaration on China" (1989)[URL]
- "Israel Set to End China Arms Deal under U.S. Pressure" (2005)[URL]
- "European Code of Conduct on Arms Exports C66 E/48" (1998)[URL]
- The European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports: Improving the Annual Report, "Sibylle Bauer", Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, ~ (2004)
- Liselotte Odgaard, "Partners in Effective Multilateralism?, In The International Politics of EU-China Relations", pp.75~ (2007), Oxford University Press
- Ruan Zongze, "China-EU-US relations, In China-EU Relations: Perceptions, Policies and Prospects", pp.296~ (2008), Routledge
- Wei-chin Lee, "Long Shot and Short Hit: China as a Military Power and Its Implications for the USA and Taiwan", Journal of Asian and African Studies, 43(5), pp.523~542 (2008)
- Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2006, "Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense", ~ (2006)
- Christopher Langton, "Military Balance 2007", pp.412~ (2007), Routledge
- Michael E. Smith, "Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation", pp.67~ (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2008, "Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense", ~ (2008)
- Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2010, "Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense", ~ (2010)
- "China’s defense budget to grow 12.7 pct in 2011: Spokesman"[URL]
- "SIPRI Military Expenditure Database"[URL]
- Orville Schell, "The China Reader: The Reform Era", pp.434~ (1999), Random House
- Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2007, "Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense", ~ (2007)
- Rana Mitter, "Modern China: A Very Short Introduction", pp.243~ (2008), OUP Oxford
- Yuan-kang Wang, "China’s Response to the Unipolar World: The Strategic Logic of Peaceful Development", Journal of Asian and African Studies, 45(5), pp.554~567 (2010)
- "Data provided by the Stockholm Institute of Peace"[URL]
- "Data provided by the Stockholm Institute of Peace"[URL]
- Bernard D Cole, "Command of the Sea, If China Attacks Taiwan: Military strategy, Politics and Economics, Steve Tsang", pp.126~ (2006), Routledge
- "Type 052 (Luhu Class) Missile Destroyer"[URL]
- Judy Dempsey, "Merkel defends German foreign policy focused on human rights", International Herald Tribune, ~ (2007)
- Hanns W. Maull, "Germany and the Use of Force: Still a Civilian Power", Survival, 42(2), pp.56~80 (2000)
- "2009", 16(2)
- "Data provided by the Stockholm Institute of Peace"[URL]
- ATM magazine, , Military Technical Magazine, 39(2), pp.21~ (2008)
- "British arms firm will spurn China if embargo ends" (2005)[URL]