본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

South Korea and the Concept of War and Peace: Back to the Confucian Future?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Does Confucianism account for any part of the perceptions of international politics that Koreans possess? If it does, then how significant has its influence been on the historical process of the conceptual formation of Korean’s concept of war and peace? First learned over two millennia ago, Confucianism finally became the sole ruling ideology under the Joseon Dynasty. Ever since, Confucian virtues—moralistic approach, education of men, and family-like international order with the Middle Kingdom at the center, among many—played dominant roles in Korean domestic politics as well as its foreign relations (Sino-Korea relations, almost exclusively). What seemed to last forever in East Asia, however, confronted a massive challenge and the fate of Koreans was not an exception. Korea’s bandwagoning strategy within the Confucian world order could not function any more with the advent of the age of imperialism and the subsequent foreign penetrations. The Japanese imperialism collapsed in 1945 and the American form of liberal democracy was transplanted in the new-born Republic of Korea in the beginning of the Cold War. Nevertheless, Koreans maintained the Confucian way of thinking and life that they had inherited over the past several centuries. And Confucianism, though largely implicit, continues to shape the concept of war and peace which again forms Koreans’ view of international politics to date. This borne in mind, examining how Confucianism has constructed the Korean norms of international relations undoubtedly merits close attention of both scholars and policymakers in this age of post-Sunshine Policy in search of new foreign policy orientation.

Abstract

Does Confucianism account for any part of the perceptions of international politics that Koreans possess? If it does, then how significant has its influence been on the historical process of the conceptual formation of Korean’s concept of war and peace? First learned over two millennia ago, Confucianism finally became the sole ruling ideology under the Joseon Dynasty. Ever since, Confucian virtues—moralistic approach, education of men, and family-like international order with the Middle Kingdom at the center, among many—played dominant roles in Korean domestic politics as well as its foreign relations (Sino-Korea relations, almost exclusively). What seemed to last forever in East Asia, however, confronted a massive challenge and the fate of Koreans was not an exception. Korea’s bandwagoning strategy within the Confucian world order could not function any more with the advent of the age of imperialism and the subsequent foreign penetrations. The Japanese imperialism collapsed in 1945 and the American form of liberal democracy was transplanted in the new-born Republic of Korea in the beginning of the Cold War. Nevertheless, Koreans maintained the Confucian way of thinking and life that they had inherited over the past several centuries. And Confucianism, though largely implicit, continues to shape the concept of war and peace which again forms Koreans’ view of international politics to date. This borne in mind, examining how Confucianism has constructed the Korean norms of international relations undoubtedly merits close attention of both scholars and policymakers in this age of post-Sunshine Policy in search of new foreign policy orientation.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Warren I. Cohen, "East Asia at the Center", pp.1~ (2000), Columbia University Press
  2. Robert B. Strassler, "The Landmark Thucydides", pp.114~ (1996), The Free Press
  3. Wm. Theodore de Bary, "Han Fei Tzu: Basic Writings" (1964), Columbia University Press
  4. Karl August Wittfogel, "Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power" (1957), Yale University Press
  5. Kung-chuan Hsiao, "The Chinese Philosophy of War: The Traditionalists’ Arguments, In Comparative World Politics: Readings in Western and Premodern Non-Western International Relations", pp.153~ (1965), Wadsworth Publishing
  6. Ja-hyun Kim Haboush, "The Confucianization of Korean Society, In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation", pp.86~ (1991), Princeton University Press
  7. Ja-hyun Kim Haboush, "The Confucianization of Korean Society, In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation", pp.87~ (1991), Princeton University Press
  8. Ja-hyun Kim Haboush, "The Confucianization of Korean Society, In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation", pp.88~ (1991), Princeton University Press
  9. Ja-hyun Kim Haboush, "The Confucianization of Korean Society, In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation", pp.89~ (1991), Princeton University Press
  10. Ja-hyun Kim Haboush, "The Confucianization of Korean Society, In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation", pp.90~ (1991), Princeton University Press
  11. Chung Chai-sik, "Chong Tojon: ‘Architect’ of Yi Dynasty Government and Ideology, In The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea", pp.59~88 (1985), Columbia University Press
  12. Ja-Hyun Kim Haboush, "A Heritage of Kings: One Man’s Monarchy in the Confucian World", pp.23~25 (1988), Columbia University Press
  13. Ja-hyun Kim Haboush, "The Confucianization of Korean Society, In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation", pp.84~110 (1991), Princeton University Press
  14. Educational Possibilities of the Values of Peace and Harmony Inherent in Korean Culture, In Teaching Asia-Pacific Core Values of Peace and Harmony: A Sourcebook for Teachers, "Kim In Whoe", UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education, 79~100 (2004)
  15. John King Fairbank, "The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations" (1968), Harvard University Press
  16. Leo Strauss, "Liberalism Ancient and Modern" (1968), Basic Books
  17. Werner Jaeger, "Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture" (1939), Oxford University Press
  18. M. Frederick Nelson, "Korea and The Old Orders in Eastern Asia" (1967), Russell & Russell
  19. M. Frederick Nelson, "Korea and the Old Orders in Eastern Asia", pp.6~ (1967), Russell & Russell
  20. Dante Alighieri, "On World-Government or De Monarchia" (1949), The Liberal Arts Press
  21. Zhengyuan Fu, "China’s Legalists: The Earliest Totalitarians and Their Art of Ruling, chapter 7" (1996), M. E. Sharpe
  22. Roger T. Ames, "The Art of Rulership: A Study in Ancient Chinese Political Thought" (1983), University of Hawaii Press
  23. Adam Watson, "Hegemony and History" (2007), Routledge
  24. Alexander Cooley, "Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, State, and Military Occupation" (2005), Cornell University Press
  25. M. Frederick Nelson, "Korea and the Old Orders in Eastern Asia", pp.14~ (1967), Russell & Russell
  26. Zhang Junbo, "Differences Between Traditional Chinese and Western Military Thinking and Their Philosophical Roots", Journal of Contemporary China, 5(12), pp.209~221 (1996)
  27. Martin Wight, "Systems of States, chap. 1" (1977), Leicester University Press
  28. Ni Lexiong, "The Implications of Ancient Chinese Military Culture, In Confucian Political Ethics, chap. 10" (2008), Princeton University Press
  29. Richard Louis Walker, "The Multi-State System of Ancient China" (1953), Shoe String Press
  30. Victoria Tin-bor Hui, "War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  31. Victoria Tin-bor Hui, "Toward a Dynamic Theory of International Politics: Insights from Comparing Ancient China and Early Modern Europe", International Organization, 58(1), pp.175~205 (2004)
  32. Gerrit W. Gong, "The Standards of Civilization in International Society", pp.3~23 (1984), Clarendon Press
  33. Gerrit W. Gong, "China’s Entry into International Society, In The Expansion of International Society", pp.172~ (1984), Clarendon Press
  34. William L. Langer, "The Diplomacy of Imperialism, 1890–1902" (1935), Alfred A. Knopf
  35. Shogo Suzuki, "Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society", pp.10~ (2009), Routledge
  36. Thucydides, "History of the Peloponnesian War", pp.404~405 (1954), Penguin Classics
  37. Hahm Pyong-Choon, "The Korean Political Tradition and Law" (1967), Hollym
  38. Hahm Pyong-Choon, "The Korean Political Tradition and Law", pp.402~ (1967), Hollym
  39. Louis Hartz, "The Liberal Tradition in America: An Introduction of American Political Thought since the Revolution" (1991), Harcourt Brace
  40. Peter Nosco, "Confucian Perspectives on Civil Society and Government, In Confucian Political Ethics", pp.31~ (2008), Princeton University Press
  41. David L. Hall, "A Pragmatic Understanding of Confucian Democracy, In Confucian Political Ethics", pp.124~160
  42. David Halberstam, "The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War", pp.66~ (2007), Hyperion
  43. Daniel Yergin, "Shattered Peace: The Origins of the Cold War and the National Security State, chap. 1" (1997), Houghton Mifflin
  44. Frank Gibney, "Korea’s Quiet Revolution: From Garrison State to Democracy" (1992), Walker and Co
  45. Glenn H. Snyder, "Alliance Politics", pp.180~190 (1997), Cornell University Press
  46. Victor D. Cha, "Alignment Despite Antagonism: The U.S.-Korea-Japan Security Triangle" (1999), Stanford University Press
  47. Kenneth N. Waltz, "Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis" (1959), Columbia University Press
  48. Kenneth N. Waltz, "Theory of International Politics" (1979), Addison-Wesley
  49. Robert B. Strassler, "The Landmark Thucydides", pp.16~ (1996), The Free Press
  50. Pyong-choon Hahm, "Toward A New Theory of Korean Politics, In Korean Politics in Transition", pp.321~356 (1975), The Washington University Press
  51. Michael Robinson, "Perceptions of Confucianism in Twenty-Century Korea, In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaption", pp.204~ (1991), Princeton University Press
  52. Arnold Wolfers, "The Actors in International Politics, In Theoretical Aspects of International Relations", pp.83~106 (1959), University of Notre Dame Press
  53. Oran R Young, "The Actors in World Politics, In The Analysis of International Politics: Essays in Honor of Harold and Margaret Sprout", pp.125~144 (1972), The Free Press
  54. James N. Rosenau, "Analyzing Actors: Individuals and collectivities, In in his Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity, chap. 6" (1990), Princeton University Press
  55. Daniel A. Bell, "Just War and Confucianism: Implications for the Contemporary world, In Confucian Political Ethics", pp.239~, Princeton University Press
  56. Wm. Theodore de Bary, "Introduction, In The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea", pp.1~58 (1985), Columbia University Press
  57. Aristotle, "Epistle to Alexander the Great on World Government, In Philosophical Perspectives on Peace", pp.3~ (1987), Macmillan Press
  58. Inis L. Claude, Jr., "Power and International Relation", pp.205~206 (1962), Random House
  59. Raymond Aron, "The Dawn of Universal History", pp.461~486 (2002), Basic Books

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)