The “Ukrainian Crisis” and Geopolitical Realignment of Eurasia: Implications for the “Eurasian Initiative (EAI)”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article focuses on the current arguments and geopolitical visions regardingthe organizational shifts in Europe and the Eurasian region and the means forrealization of these policies. It shows the responses of the major powers inEurope and Eurasia with regard to the “Ukrainian Crisis.” In this article also,analysis and comparison of the Eurasian strategy of China and Russia, which bearcritical importance to geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations regarding theKorean Peninsula, is treated with significance along with the aforementionedissues. The article attempts to provide a short analysis of the implications of thesepan-Eurasian strategic shifts on the Eurasian initiative of the Korean government. The concepts of Russia’s “Pivot to the East,” China’s “One Belt, One Road (OBOR),”and Korea’s “Eurasia Initiative” share a potential to stimulate the transition of theAsia-Pacific region from “the ocean of conflict” to “the ocean of peace.” However,in realizing these concepts, the relationship between Korea and the four powers(U.S.A./China/Russia/Japan) have a “strategic trilemma.” If the Eurasia Initiativecan facilitate construction of the “continent of peace” in Eurasia, it will provide avision and strategic opportunity to change the region form an “ocean of conflict”into an “ocean of peace.”
Abstract
This article focuses on the current arguments and geopolitical visions regardingthe organizational shifts in Europe and the Eurasian region and the means forrealization of these policies. It shows the responses of the major powers inEurope and Eurasia with regard to the “Ukrainian Crisis.” In this article also,analysis and comparison of the Eurasian strategy of China and Russia, which bearcritical importance to geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations regarding theKorean Peninsula, is treated with significance along with the aforementionedissues. The article attempts to provide a short analysis of the implications of thesepan-Eurasian strategic shifts on the Eurasian initiative of the Korean government. The concepts of Russia’s “Pivot to the East,” China’s “One Belt, One Road (OBOR),”and Korea’s “Eurasia Initiative” share a potential to stimulate the transition of theAsia-Pacific region from “the ocean of conflict” to “the ocean of peace.” However,in realizing these concepts, the relationship between Korea and the four powers(U.S.A./China/Russia/Japan) have a “strategic trilemma.” If the Eurasia Initiativecan facilitate construction of the “continent of peace” in Eurasia, it will provide avision and strategic opportunity to change the region form an “ocean of conflict”into an “ocean of peace.”
참고문헌 (50)
- Dmitri Trenin, "Welcome to Cold War II: This is what it will look like", Foreign Policy, ~ (2014)
- Simon Tisdall, "The New Cold War: Are we Going Back to the Bad Old Days?", The Guardian, ~ (2014)
- F. Stephen Larrabee, "The Ukraine Crisis and European Security, Implication for United States and U.S. Army", RAND Corporation, ~ (2015)
- "Ukraine: Cold War Redux Or New Global Challenge?" (2014)[URL]
- "Is the Cold War Back?" (2014)[URL]
- "The Colder War Has Begun" (2014)[URL]
- "A Little Cold War: Russia, Europe and the United States" (2013)[URL]
- Paul K. Davis, "Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning-Colliding RMAs Necessitate a New Strategy", RAND Corporation, ~ (2011)
- "This Isn’t A Cold War. And That’s Not Necessarily Good" (2014)[URL]
- Dmitri Trenin, "The Ukraine Crisis and the Resumption of Great-Power Rivalry", Carnegie Moscow Center, ~ (2014)
- Qamar Fatima, "New Great Game:Player, Interests, Strategies and Central Asia", South Asian Studies, 29(2), pp.623~652 (2014)
- Katarzyna Klatka-Urbaniak, "The U.S. and Russia in the 21st Century: The Great Game of Influence", Prezeglad Zachodni, (2), pp.75~94 (2013)
- "The New Great Game in Central Asia: Geopolitics in a Post-Western World" (2012)[URL]
- Marco Rossi, "Old Games, New Players: Russia, China and the Struggle for Mastery in Central Asia", Policy Briefing, pp.4~19 (2012)
- Shamkhal Abilov, "The ‘New Great Game’ Over the Caspian Region: Russia, the U.S.A., and China in the Same Melting Pot", Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(2), pp.29~55 (2012)
- François Godement, "The New Great Game in Central Asia", China Analysis, Asia Centre, European Council on Foreign Relations, 1~12 (2011)
- Petar Kurec˘ic´, "The New Great Game: Rivalry of Geostrategies and Geoeconomies in Central Asia", Hrvatski Geografski Glasnik, 72(1), pp.21~48 (2010)
- Richard Sakwa, "The Death of Europe?: Continental Fates after Ukraine", International Affairs, 91(3), pp.553~565 (2015)
- Sergei Karaganov, "2014: Preliminary Results", Rossiiskaia Gazeta, ~ (2014)
- Dmitri Trenin, "Welcome to Cold War II", ~
- Ivan Kratsev, "The European Disorder", European Council on Foreign Relations, ~ (2014)
- Timothy Garton Ash, "Free World: Why a Crisis of the West Reveals the Opportunity of Our Time" (2005), Penguin
- Albena Azmanova, "Euro-Atlanticism and Euro-Gaullism as Dilemmas of EU–U.S. Relations", Academia Diplomatica Europaea (lecture series) (2006)
- Andrew Cottey, "Security in 21st Century Europe" (2013), Palgrave Macmillan
- Daniel Levy, "Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe: Trans Atlantic Relations after the Iraq War", pp.34~40 (2005), Verso
- Giuseppe Mazzini, "A Cosmopolitanism of Nations: Giuseppe Mazzini’s Writings on Democracy, Nation Building and International Relations", pp.131~135 (2009), Princeton University Press
- Ben Rosamond, "Theories of European Integration", pp.21~22 (2000), Palsgrave
- Stephen White, "Ideologies and Foreign Policies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: the other Europes", pp.1~29 (2014), Palgrave Mcmillan
- Alexey Gromyko, "West-Russia Relations in Light of the Ukraine Crisis", pp.49~63 (2015), Edizioni Nuova Cultura
- Henrik Boesen Lindbo Larsen, "NATO, EU and Russia after 2014: Great Power Politics and the Ukrainian Crisis", DIIS, 15~17 (2015)
- "Statements and discussion with Dr Angela Merkel" (2015)[URL]
- Henrik Boesen Lindbo Larsen, "NATO, EU and Russia after 2014", 27~26
- The EU and Russia: Before and beyond the Crisis in Ukraine, 6th Report of Session 2014–2015, "House of Lords", European Union Committee, 79~92 (2015)
- "How the EU Sleepwalked into a Conflict with Russia" (2014)[URL]
- Ukraine: Current Issues and U.S. Policy, "Steven Woehrel", Congressional Research Services, ~ (2015)
- Valdai International Discussion Club, "Toward the Great Ocean-2: Russia’s Breakthrough toward Asia (Draft)", 9~11 (2013)
- "The New Integration Project for Eurasia: a Future that is born today" (2011)[URL]
- "The New Integration Project for Eurasia: Appearance on TV/Radio Echo Moscow" (2011)[URL]
- Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely, "Nicu Popescu", Institute for Security studies, ~, pp.Chaillot Papers, No. 132 (2014)
- Nicu Popescu, "Eurasian Union", 22~25
- François Godement, "One Belt, One Road: China’s Great Leap Outward", China Analysis, 1~ (2015)
- "China to invest $900b in Belt and Road Initiative" (2015)[URL]
- "Foreign Minister Wang Yi Meets the Press" (2015)[URL]
- "Silk Road Initiatives not China’s Marshall Plan: Spokesman" (2015)[URL]
- David Cohen, "One Belt, One Road: China’s Great Leap Outward", China Analysis, 3~5 (2015)
- Antoine Bondaz, "One Belt, One Road: China’s Great Leap Outward", China Analysis, 7~ (2015)
- Alexander Gabuev, "A ‘Soft Alliance?’: Russia–China Relations after the Ukraine Crisis", European Council on Foreign Relations, ~ (2015)