본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

WTO 반덤핑협정 중 행정재심사관련내용의 개선방안에 관한 연구

A Legal Analysis on Administrative Review System in the Anti-Dupming Agreement: Searching for Improvements of the Administrative Review System

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

현행 WTO반덤핑협정은 제9.3조(반덤핑관세의 산정), 제9.5조(신규수출자재심사), 제11.2조(중간재심사), 제11.3조(종료재심사) 하의 재심사에 적용 가능한 개념, 절차와 방법에 대하여 명확히 규정하지 않고 있다. 명백한 규칙의 부재는 조사기관으로 하여금 이들 재심사에 원심조사와 상당히 구분되는 규칙, 절차와 방법을 자의적으로 도입할 수 있도록 하여 피제소자에게 불 공정한 부담을 지우고 있으며 이러한 상황은 법적 안정성과 모든 반덤핑조사에 필수적인 투명성을 손상한다. 각 회원국이 자의적으로 규칙, 절차와 방법을 도입하는 관행은 또한 인위적으로 덤핑마진을 부풀리며 덤핑을 상쇄시키는데 필요하지 아니한 반덤핑관세를 부과하는 것으로 이어진다. 원심조사에 대해서만 다자적 통제를 확립하는 것이 아니라 반덤핑협정 제9조와 제11조에 규정된 여러 가지 재심사를 포함하여 반덤핑절차의 모든 추후단계에 대해서도 다자적 통제를 확립하여야 할 필요성이 있다. 즉 반덤핑협정 전반을 관통하여 적용되는 기본적인 실체조항, 방법과 절차를 담보하는 동시에 예측 가능성을 제고시켜야 한다.

Abstract

The current Anti-Dumping Agreement does not clearly articulate the concepts, procedures and methodologies applicable to reviews under Article 9.3 (anti-dumping duty assessment), Article 9.5 (new shipper reviews) and Article 11.2 (revocation reviews). The lack of explicit rules makes it possible for the authorities to arbitrarily introduce rules, procedures, and methodologies into these reviews that differ substantially from those in the original investigations and thereby place an undue burden on the respondent. Such practices are also pursued to artificially inflate the calculated dumping margins and/or to continue to impose an anti-dumping duty that is not necessary to offset dumping. This situation should be rectified to provide enhanced predictability as well as to ensure that the basic substantive provisions, methods and procedures are applied throughout the AD Agreement.

참고문헌 (73)

  1. "DDA협상분야별 쟁점 및 평가와 우리의 통상정책방향" (2004), 대외경제정책연구원
  2. "DDA 규범분야의 협상의제별 주요 쟁점과 시사점" (2003), 대외경제정책연구원
  3. "DDA 규범분야의 논의동향과 개정방향" (2002), 대외경제정책연구원
  4. "DDA 규범 협상 현황 및 전망" (2005)
  5. 대외경제정책연구원, "WTO 도하 개발 아젠다 협상의 출범과 향후 대응방안" (2001)
  6. "WTO 칸쿤각료회의의 평가 및 DDA협상 전망" (2003)
  7. "DDA협상의 주요 쟁점 및 전망" (2004)
  8. "WTO DDA 최근 논의동향과 향후 전망 홍콩 각료회의를 준비하며" (2005)
  9. "WTO DDA 반덤핑 협상 동향과 우리의 대응방안" (2004), KOTRA 통상전략팀
  10. "2005 무역구제 서울포럼 자료집" (2005)
  11. "DDA 반덤핑협정 개정협상에서 미국 EU 및 중국의 입장 분석연구" (2003), 고려대학교 통상법연구센터
  12. "WTO반덤핑협정의 개정방향 탐구" (2001), 대외경제정책연구원
  13. "DDA 규범협상 반덤핑 분야 중간점검" (2003)
  14. "WTO DDA 중간점검 도하에서 칸쿤까지 분야별 논의결과" (2003)
  15. "DDA협상 총점검 2002" (2002), 대외경제정책연구원
  16. "DDA 중간점검 2003" (2003), 대외경제정책연구원
  17. "칸쿤 WTO각료회의의 평가와 DDA협상의 전망" (2003)
  18. "WTO", DDA 협상의제 쟁점 분석과 한국의 통상협상 전략 정책, 2006, ~
  19. "The 10 Major Problems With the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis", 39(1) (2005)
  20. "WTO Antidumping Issues in the Doha Development Agenda" (2005), CRS Report for Congress
  21. "Probabilistic Approach to the Use of Econometric Models in Sunset Review", (1) (2006)
  22. "Reforming the Antidumping Agreement A Road Map for WTO Negotiations" (2002), Cato Institute
  23. "Evaluation of EC Trade Defence Measures" (2005)
  24. "Improved Disciplines under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and the Anti-Dumping Agreement: Communication from Canada" (2002)
  25. "Proposals on Implementation Related Issues and Concerns: Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures", Anti-Dumping Agreement Submission by India, 2002, ~
  26. "Anti-Dumping: Illustrative Major Issues: Paper from Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Israel; Japan; Korea; Mexico; Norway; Singapore; Switzerland; Thailand and Turkey" (2002)
  27. "Implementation-Related Issues Paper by Brazil" (2002)
  28. "Second Contribution to Discussion of the Negotiating Group on Rules on Anti-Dumping Measures: Paper by Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Israel; Japan; Korea; Norway; Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; Singapore; Switzerland; and Thailand" (2002)
  29. "Questions from the European Communities on Documents TN", RL, 6 AND TN, pp.RL, W[DOI]
  30. "Comments on Document TN", RL, 6 on Anti-Dumping Measures Paper from Australia, 2002
  31. "Comments on Document TN", RL, 10 on Anti-Dumping Measures Paper from Australia, 2002
  32. "Second Submission of India", pp.17~ (2002)
  33. "Replies to Questions to Our First Contribution (TN", RL, 6): Paper from Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Israel; Japan; Korea; Norway; Singapore; Switzerland and Thailand, 2003
  34. "Submission from Canada Respecting the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 (The Anti-Dumping Agreement)" (2003)
  35. "Proposal of the People's Republic of China on the Negotiation on Anti-Dumping" (2003)
  36. "Identification of Certain Major Issues under the Anti-Dumping and Subsidies Agreements: Submission by the United States" (2003)
  37. "Proposal on Sunset: Paper from Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Israel; Japan; Korea; Norway; the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; Singapore; Switzerland; Thailand and Turkey" (2003)
  38. "Preliminary Comments and Questions by the Arab Republic of Egypt on the Contributions Submitted in the Framework of the Doha Negotiations on the Anti-Dumping Agreement and on the Agreement on Subsidies and Counterveailing Measures: Submission from Egypt" (2003)
  39. "communication from argentina" (2003)
  40. "Proposal on Reviews: Paper from Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Israel; Japan; Korea; Norway; Singapore; Switzerland; the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; and Thailand" (2003)
  41. "Egypt's Preliminary Comments on the Contributions Submitted in the Framework of the Doha Negotiations on the Agreements on Anti-Dumping and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures" (2003)
  42. "Agreements on Anti-Dumping Practices and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Illustrative Common Issues: Paper by Brazil; Chile; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Japan; Korea; Norway; Switzerland; Thailand and Turkey" (2003)
  43. "Identification of Issues under the Anti-Dumping Agreement that Need to be Improved and Clarified within the Current Negotiations on WTO Rules: Second Submission of the Arab Republic of Egypt" (2003)
  44. "Identification of Issues under the Anti-Dumping Agreement that Need to be Improved and Clarified within the Current Negotiations on WTO Rules: Second Submission of the Arab Republic of Egypt Corrigendum" (2003)
  45. "Korea’s View on the Improvement of the Sunset System Submission of the Republic of Korea" (2003)
  46. "Comments by Australia on the Proposal by Various Members on Reviews" (2003)
  47. "Comments by Australia on the Proposal by Various Members on Sunset Reviews" (2003)
  48. "Comments by Venezuela on Document TN", RL, 111 Submitted by Korea Concerning Its View of the Improvement of the Sunset System, 2003
  49. "Proposals on Cost Saving in Anti-Dumping Proceedings: Submission from the European Communities and Japan" (2003)
  50. "Negotiating Group on Rules Note by the Chairman Compilation of Issues and Proposals Identified by Participants in the Negotiating Group on Rules" (2003)
  51. "New Shipper Reviews ADA Article 9.5 Communication from the United States" (2004)
  52. "New Shipper Reviews (ADA Article 9.5): Communication from the United States" (2004)
  53. "Senior Officials' Statement: Communication from Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Israel; Japan; Korea, Rep. of; Mexico; Norway; Singapore; Switzerland; the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; Thailand; and Turkey" (2005)
  54. "Article 11.3 (Sunset): Communication from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu" (2006)
  55. "Reviews: Communication from Brazil; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Israel; Japan; Korea; Norway; Singapore; Switzerland; Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; and Thailand" (2004)
  56. "Further Submission on Proposals on Proceedings under Article 9: Paper from Chile; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Japan; Korea, Rep. of; Norway; Switzerland; Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu; Thailand; and Turkey" (2005)
  57. "Further Explanations on the Applicability of Articles 2 and 6 and the De Minimis Rule to the Proceedings under Articles 9.3 and 9.5: Paper from Chile; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Japan; Korea, Rep. of; Norway; Switzerland; Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; Thailand; and Turkey Supplement" (2005)
  58. "Proposals on Proceedings under Article 11.2: Communication from Brazil, Chile, Israel, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Switzerland, Thailand" (2005)
  59. "Informal Paper on Anti-Dumping and Subsidies Agreements Paper from South Africa" (2005)
  60. "Sunset Reviews Communication from Canada" (2005)
  61. "Further Submission of Proposals on Sunset: Communication from Chile;Hong Kong, China;Japan;Korea, Rep. of; Norway;Switzerland;Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu;and Thailand"
  62. "New Shipper Reviews (Article 9.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement): Paper from Mexico" (2006)
  63. "Proposals on Sunset Paper from Japan" (2006)
  64. "Procedures for Adversely Affected Domestic Interested Parties Paper from Canada" (2006)
  65. "Proposal on Article 11.2 Communication from Brazil" (2006)
  66. "Duration of Review Investigations Communication from Egypt" (2006)
  67. "Proposals on the Prohibition of Zeroing Communication from Japan" (2006)
  68. "Collection of Anti-Dumping Duties under Article 9.3 Communication from the United States" (2006)
  69. "Doha WTO Ministerial 2001 Ministerial Declaration" (2001)
  70. "United States-Anti-Dumping Duty on Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors (DRAMS) of One Megabit or above from Korea: Report of the Panel" (1999)
  71. "Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade"
  72. "The Antidumping Negotiations: Proposals, Positions and Antidumping Profiles", 6(1) (2005)
  73. "The Antidumping Negotiations: Proposals, Positions and Antidumping Profiles", 6(1) (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)