본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

课内外语言输入與输出平衡发展的设计与实证研究- 以高级阶段的对韩汉语教学为中心

Study on Balanced Development Design in the Language Input and Output of In-and Out-class Training Activities— Focusing on Chinese Language Teaching for Advanced-level Korean Students

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The process of learning languages involves acquiring and comprehending linguistic knowledge. Much debate has been conducted on the topic of language input and output in Chinese language teaching at the college level in China, but not in Korea, where the method of providing Chinese language education has been somewhat unbalanced. To elaborate, Chinese language education in Korea has focused on acquiring the language itself rather than on teaching students how to put it into practice. This study, which is based on teaching theories pertaining to foreign languages and constructivism, divided Chinese language classes into in- and out-class training activities. This study also discussed theoretical and practical studies to advocate the establishment of a student-centered teaching mode in which in- and out-class training activities are created and conducted. A way to reform the mediums and methods of teaching and to carry on the second class room activities is to set up an environment for Chinese language learning in which students are provided opportunities to practice their language and to participate in communication activities; this way, they can acquire the ability to actually use the language. To prove that it is feasible to apply a combination of language input and output in language teaching for students in Korea, the author conducted an experiment, lasting one semester, with 23 students of two classes for advanced learners in a certain college’s Chinese language department. The Chinese teacher was the author herself. The result of the general examinations with a common test paper for all the students from advanced learners in our school is feasible with actual and scientific data. The outcome of the experiment shows that it is feasible to use a combination of language input and output in Chinese language teaching for students in Korea. According to the results of the survey, both learners and teachers should pay careful attention to certain details of both input factors and output factors. On the one hand, from the viewpoint of input, teachers should ensure learners’ favorable quality, quantity, reliability, and significance of the input language. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of output, teachers should provide a relaxed and ordered setting for learners to practice their output. Both input and output are implemented in different modes in Chinese language teaching at the college level. Different teaching modes can be applied to different teaching contents. Therefore, it is necessary to research input and output in different teaching modes. Combining all the positive elements of different teaching modes leads to ideal and effective teaching. Additionally, a better understanding of input and output theories can facilitate Chinese language teaching and learning. This study, on the basis of the fact that Korean students are more competent in reading than in writing and speaking, analyzes how language input and output are used in Chinese language teaching at the college level in Korea. It also points out that language input and output must be balanced. Additionally, using language input and output theories, this study stresses the importance of practice in language output. Finally, it also suggests some ways to make students achieve a balance with regard to linguistic competence. The aforementioned analysis shows that language input and output theories can help improve the state of Chinese language education in Korea.

Abstract

The process of learning languages involves acquiring and comprehending linguistic knowledge. Much debate has been conducted on the topic of language input and output in Chinese language teaching at the college level in China, but not in Korea, where the method of providing Chinese language education has been somewhat unbalanced. To elaborate, Chinese language education in Korea has focused on acquiring the language itself rather than on teaching students how to put it into practice. This study, which is based on teaching theories pertaining to foreign languages and constructivism, divided Chinese language classes into in- and out-class training activities. This study also discussed theoretical and practical studies to advocate the establishment of a student-centered teaching mode in which in- and out-class training activities are created and conducted. A way to reform the mediums and methods of teaching and to carry on the second class room activities is to set up an environment for Chinese language learning in which students are provided opportunities to practice their language and to participate in communication activities; this way, they can acquire the ability to actually use the language. To prove that it is feasible to apply a combination of language input and output in language teaching for students in Korea, the author conducted an experiment, lasting one semester, with 23 students of two classes for advanced learners in a certain college’s Chinese language department. The Chinese teacher was the author herself. The result of the general examinations with a common test paper for all the students from advanced learners in our school is feasible with actual and scientific data. The outcome of the experiment shows that it is feasible to use a combination of language input and output in Chinese language teaching for students in Korea. According to the results of the survey, both learners and teachers should pay careful attention to certain details of both input factors and output factors. On the one hand, from the viewpoint of input, teachers should ensure learners’ favorable quality, quantity, reliability, and significance of the input language. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of output, teachers should provide a relaxed and ordered setting for learners to practice their output. Both input and output are implemented in different modes in Chinese language teaching at the college level. Different teaching modes can be applied to different teaching contents. Therefore, it is necessary to research input and output in different teaching modes. Combining all the positive elements of different teaching modes leads to ideal and effective teaching. Additionally, a better understanding of input and output theories can facilitate Chinese language teaching and learning. This study, on the basis of the fact that Korean students are more competent in reading than in writing and speaking, analyzes how language input and output are used in Chinese language teaching at the college level in Korea. It also points out that language input and output must be balanced. Additionally, using language input and output theories, this study stresses the importance of practice in language output. Finally, it also suggests some ways to make students achieve a balance with regard to linguistic competence. The aforementioned analysis shows that language input and output theories can help improve the state of Chinese language education in Korea.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김선미, "Harmer의 교수 학습 모형을 통한 고등학생의 독해력 향상에 관한 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.1998
  2. 김현정, "중국어 교육의 의사소통 능력 지도 방안 연구 : 중학교 중국어 의사소통 능력 향상을 중심으로", 석사, 중국어교육, pp.2005
  3. 정혜영, "Krashen의 “입력 가설(Input Hypothesis)”에 관한 개인적 고찰", 교육과학연구, 33(1), pp.131~147 (2002), 교육과학연구소
  4. 조연정, "중국어 의사소통 능력 향상을 위한 협동수업(Team-Teaching) 모형 연구", 석사, 중어중문교육, pp.2009
  5. Harmer,J, (2001), Longman
  6. Krashen,S, (1985), Longman
  7. Krashen,S, "Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition" (1982), Pergamon
  8. Swain,M, (1985), Newbury House
  9. "1988", 12
  10. "1990"
  11. 崔淑燕, "近年来韩国留学生HSK (初中等) 成绩分析研究", 语言教学研究, (3) (2008)
  12. 韩容洙, "韩国汉语教学概观", 汉语学习, (4) (2004)
  13. 胡丹, "输入输出理论指导下对外汉语初级口语教学的情境创设策略及实践", 北京电力高等专科学校学报, (8) (2012)
  14. 金志刚, "高原期现象与对外汉语教学", 汉语学习, (5) (1998)
  15. 李玉军, "留学生HSK成绩跛脚现象分析", 语言教学与研究, (2) (2006)
  16. 梁丽虹, "语言输入和输出理论指导下的高职高专英语教学模式探索与实践研究", 大家, (20) (2011)
  17. 刘天放, "关于语言输入与输出的理论与大学英语教学改革", 保山师专学报, 24(3) (2005)
  18. 刘继红, "当代韩国汉语教育发展分析", 黑龙江高教研究, (3) (2005)
  19. 唐昌平, "从语言信息处理模式论语言输入与输出的原则", 四川外语学院学报, 22(6) (2006)
  20. 王庆云, "韩国语中的汉源词汇与对韩汉语教学", 语言教学与研究, (5) (2002)
  21. 温晓虹, "汉教学输人与学习者的语言输出", 世界汉语教学, (3) (2007)
  22. 尤其达, "输入與输出并举,提高英语应用能力", 外语界, (6) (2001)
  23. 张彦玲, "从语言输入与输出理论领域审视大学英语听说教学", 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版), (1) (2012)
  24. 朱伟娟, "克拉申“输入假说”理论在对外汉语教学中的应用", 湖北社会科学, (6) (2012)
  25. 邹铃声, "语言单位与语言教学——第二语言教学盲点剖析之一", 云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版), 7(6) (2009)
  26. 祖晓梅, "汉语课堂的师生互动模式与第二语言习得", 语言教学与研究, (1) (2009)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)