노마디즘 관점의 장소 상실과 생성을 통한 장소되기 잠재성 연구

Abstract

(Background and Purpose) Modern society rejects and extends fixed system infinitely according to the development of technical information and paradigm change after the mid-late 20th century. However, from the viewpoint of traditional place theory, modern daily life style and place have difficulty in interpreting, lack of virtuality, and loss of place. Therefore, this study started from recognizing the necessity of reinterpreting the place of loss, and the lost place is based on the premise that it has infinite virtuality. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to suggest the virtuality of becoming a new place to form a continuous relationship by repetitive realization of inherent virtuality rather than the opposite concept. (Method) The method of this study is as follows: First, it is necessary to understand the place through the preceding studies and to present the necessity of reinterpreting the place by raising the limit of application to the existing traditional place. Second, based on Deleuze's virtuality, the starting point of reinterpretation of the place, the virtuality characteristics are derived from the perspective of nomadism, which is the reason for the becoming a new place, through the Rhizome, Pli and Simulacre. Third, the characteristics derived by immanently embodying the virtuality state that can be expressed as a creation are analyzed by substituting the actual cases to be seen as the reason of endless movement and change. Fourth, based on the conclusion, the utilization plan and expected effect of future research are suggested. (Results) The virtuality characteristics of the reason of Rhizome_differentiation, the reason for Pli_flow, and the reason of Simulacra_repeat were specifically derived, and this proved as a case that the virtuality inherent in the place became real through transformation and movement, and the loss and creation of the place had a continuous relationship that could repeatedly escape and invade. The virtuality to become a place by such creative creation does not exist individually, but it is intertwined and combined to form a total meaning and repeats loss and creation. (Conclusions) According to the modern paradigm, the place does not stay in fixed things but constantly makes heterogeneous and connections and produces them as another. This study suggests that the creative ‘place-being’ should be able to cope with the social needs of diversification and fragmentation by overcoming the limitations of being buried in one identity over time and lacking potential of diversification. Therefore, the loss and creation of a place from the perspective of nomadism is expected to become an indicator for becoming a new place through the repetition of constant differences.