淸代 『十三經注疏校勘記』의 편찬과 의의
A Study on the Compilation and Significance of the Thirteen Classics Collation in Qing Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to scrutinize the background and process of compilation of the Thirteen Classics Collation in Qing Dynasty and to investigate of the significance of it. Since Southern Song Dynasty, the Thirteen Classics are published in combined form of Jing[經], Zhu[注], and Shu[疏], and the typical type is the “ten lines version of Song Dynasty”. In Ming and Qing Dynasties, Min version[閩本], Jian version[監本], and Mao version[毛本] are circulated in popular, but these versions had a great deal of errors. The scholars who had recognized these problems tried to compile the revised version of the Thirteen Classics. Especially, they gave attention to the combined form of Zhu and Shu, and found the structural problems of the errors. As a result, they failed the perfect collation eventually, but developed the methodology of textual criticism of the classics.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to scrutinize the background and process of compilation of the Thirteen Classics Collation in Qing Dynasty and to investigate of the significance of it. Since Southern Song Dynasty, the Thirteen Classics are published in combined form of Jing[經], Zhu[注], and Shu[疏], and the typical type is the “ten lines version of Song Dynasty”. In Ming and Qing Dynasties, Min version[閩本], Jian version[監本], and Mao version[毛本] are circulated in popular, but these versions had a great deal of errors. The scholars who had recognized these problems tried to compile the revised version of the Thirteen Classics. Especially, they gave attention to the combined form of Zhu and Shu, and found the structural problems of the errors. As a result, they failed the perfect collation eventually, but developed the methodology of textual criticism of the classics.
참고문헌 (42)
- 김광일, "사라진 중국책, 일본에서 살아남다 ― 일존서(佚存書) 전승의 문화적 배경과 그 의미", 중국문학, 57, pp.353~376 (2008), 한국중국어문학회
- 김효신, "段顧論爭과 淸代 校勘理論의 형성 연구", 박사, pp.2017
- 후마 스스무, "연행사와 통신사" (2008), 신서원
- 陳鴻三, "『中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所集刊』 第60本 第3分" (1989), 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
- 陳鱣, "經籍跋文" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
- 段玉裁, "經韻樓集" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
- 關口順, "經典與校勘論叢" (2015), 北京大學出版社
- 顧廣圻, "顧千里集" (2007), 中華書局
- 黃丕烈, "黃丕烈藏書題跋集" (2013), 上海古籍出版社
- 孔穎達, "影印南宋越刊八行本禮記正義" (2014), 北京大學出版社
- 李慧玲, "阮刻『毛詩注疏(附校勘記)』硏究", 博士, pp.2008
- 李慧玲, "試論阮元『十三經注疏校勘記』得以問世的客觀條件", 東南學術, (1) (2013)
- 盧文弨, "抱經堂文集" (1990), 中華書局
- 劉錦藻, "淸續文獻通考 (萬有文庫本)" (1937), 商務印書館
- 李慶, "顧千里硏究" (2013), 臺灣學生書局
- 毛亨, "毛詩正義" (2000), 北京大學出版社
- 錢大昕, "十駕齋養新錄" (2011), 上海書店出版社
- 錢宗武, "論阮元『十三經注疏校勘記』兩個版本系統", 古籍硏究 (2008)
- 永瑢, "四庫全書總目提要" (1971), 臺灣商務印書館
- 阮元, "『十三經注疏倂釋文校勘記』(文選樓本), 續修四庫全書" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
- 阮元, "重刊宋本十三經注疏 (南昌府學本)" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
- 阮元, "揅經室集" (1993), 中華書局
- 孫殿起, "販書偶記" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
- 唐光榮, "『十三經注疏校勘記』圈(“○”)後案語作者問題考論", 碩士, pp.2001
- 唐光榮, "『十三經注疏校勘記』中的兩類校勘記", 古籍整理硏究季刊 (2004)
- 唐光榮, "阮元、段玉裁與『十三經注疏校勘記』", 達縣師範高等專科學校學報(社會科學版), 14(3) (2004)
- 王國維, "觀堂集林" (1996), 中華書局
- 王應麟, "玉海藝文校證" (2013), 鳳凰出版社
- 汪紹楹, "阮氏重刻宋本十三經注疏考", 文史, 3 (1963), 中華書局
- 蕭穆, "敬孚類稿" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 張麗娟, "宋代經書注疏刊刻硏究" (2013), 北京大學出版社
- 張鑑, "阮元年譜" (1995), 中華書局
- 臧庸, "拜經堂文集" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 周予同, "群經槪論, 周予同經學史論" (2010), 上海人民出版社
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "乾隆朝上諭檔" (1998), 中國檔案出版社
- 何晏, "論語集解義疏", 大觀堂
- 狩野直喜, "支那學文藪" (1927), 弘文堂
- 山井鼎, "七經孟子考文補遺, 叢書集成初編" (1985), 中華書局
- 水上雅晴, "段玉裁と十三經注疏校勘記", 中國哲學, (31) (2003), 北海島中國哲學會
- 長澤規矩也, "書誌學論考 (長澤規矩也著作集)" (1982), 汲古書院
- 長澤規矩也, "書誌學論考 (長澤規矩也著作集)" (1982), 汲古書院
- 足利學校遺蹟圖書館, "足利學校貴重書目錄" (1925), 足利學校遺蹟圖書館