본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

복수 가해자 사건에 대한 목격자 증언 정확성 재고: 타임라인 기법의 검증

Consideration of Eyewitness Testimony in Multiple Offender Crime: Verification about Timeline Technique

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

본 연구는 복수 가해자가 포함된 복잡한 범죄 사건에서 목격자의 회상을 촉진하기 위한 새로운 기법인 타임라인 기법의 효과성을 국내에서 검증하기 위한 목적으로 실시되었다. 새로운 면담기법의 효과성을 검증하기 위하여 본 연구의 목적인 타임라인 기법을 개방형 면담 기법 중 가장 흔하게 사용하고 있는 자유회상 기법과 다양한 측면에서 그 효과성을 비교하였다. 본 연구는 남성 33명, 여성 70명 총 103명의 성인 남녀를 대상으로 총 3명의 가해자가 포함된 모의 강도 영상을 통해 실험을 실시하였다. 효과성 검증을 위해 전체 보고 수, 정확률, 오류 비율(순서오류, 매칭오류), 권력관계 추론, 진술 확신도의 측면에서 분석하였으며, 연구결과 자유회상 기법이 전체 보고 수가 더 많은 반면 타임라인 기법의 경우 정확률과 권력관계 추론 정확성이 더 높았고 순서오류가 더 적게 나타났다. 매칭오류 비율과 진술 확신도는 유의미한 차이를 나타내지 않았으며, 추가적인 분석에서 성별효과 또한 발견되지 않았다. 본 연구는 국내에서 목격자 진술 정확성을 높이기 위한 새로운 진술 기법을 검증함과 동시에 기존에 사용되는 면담 기법들을 보완해줄 수 있는 새로운 진술 기법을 국내에 소개하였다는 점에서 그 의의가 있다.

Abstract

Current study was conducted to verify the effectiveness of a Timeline Technique for facilitating the recall of witnesses in complex crime cases involved multiple offender. To verify the effectiveness of the new interviewing technique, the Timeline Technique, we compared its effectiveness with the free recall technique widely used in various aspects. Current study involved a total of 103 adult participants, consisting of 33 males and 70 females, who were shown a mock robbery video involved three offenders. In order to assess effectiveness, the study analyzed the number of overall reporting details, accuracy rate, error rates (sequence errors, matching errors), inference of leadership, and confidence. The results of the study showed that Timeline Technique exhibited higher accuracy and leadership inference accuracy, and fewer sequence errors. There were no significant differences in matching error rates and statement confidence, and few gender effects were found in additional analyses. Current study is significant in that it verify a new testimony technique to improve the accuracy of witness testimony in domestic settings and introduces a new technique that can complement existing interview techniques.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Bower, G., "A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1)", pp.229~325 (1967), Academic Press
  2. Fisher, R. P., "Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview" (1992), Charles C Thomas Publisher
  3. Hope, L, "Interviewing and interrogation: A review of research and practice since World War II" (2022), Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher
  4. 권혁준, "라인업의 제시방법과 필러 유사성에 따른 목격자 진술의 정확성 분석 : 다중 d’ 모형을 중심으로", 한국범죄학, 15(2), pp.63~80 (2021), 대한범죄학회
  5. 양승돈, "언어 네트워크 분석(Semantic Network Analysis)을 활용한 민간경비 분야의 연구 경향", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(11), pp.894~901 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  6. Areh, I., "Gender-related differences in eyewitness testimony", Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), pp.559~563 (2011)
  7. Belli, R. F., "The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys", Memory, 6(4), pp.383~406 (1998)
  8. Belli, R. F., "Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods", Public opinion quarterly, 65(1), pp.45~74 (2001)
  9. Bower, G. H., "Scripts in memory for text", Cognitive psychology, 11(2), pp.177~220 (1979)
  10. Christianson, S. Å., "Hands up! A study of witnesses'emotional reactions and memories associated with bank robberies", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7(5), pp.365~379 (1993)
  11. Fisher, R. P., "Critical analysis of police interviewing techniques", Journal of Police Science and Administrations, 15, pp.177~185 (1987)
  12. Fisher, R. P., "Interviewing cooperative witnesses", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), pp.16~19 (2011)
  13. Gabbert, F., "Protecting eyewitness evidence:examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool", Law and human behavior, 33(4), pp.298~ (2009)
  14. Głomb, K., "How to improve eyewitness testimony research: theoretical and methodological concerns about experiments on the impact of emotions on memory performance", Psychological Research, 86(1), pp.1~11 (2022)
  15. Hope, L., "Who said what and when? A timeline approach to eliciting information and intelligence about conversations, plots, and plans", Law and Human Behavior, 43(3), pp.263~ (2019)
  16. Hope, L., "Who? What? When? Using a timeline technique to facilitate recall of a complex event", Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), pp.20~24 (2013)
  17. Howard, M. W., "Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), pp.923~ (1999)
  18. Kebbell, M. R., "Police officers’ perception of eyewitness factors in forensic investigations: A survey", The Journal ofSocial Psychology, 138, pp.323~330 (1998)
  19. Kebbell, M. R., "Why do the police interview eyewitnesses? Interview objectives and the evaluation of eyewitness performance", The Journal of Psychology, 131(6), pp.595~601 (1997)
  20. Kebbell, M. R., "The influence of item difficulty on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy", British Journal of Psychology, 87(4), pp.653~662 (1996)
  21. Kontogianni, F., "Facilitating recall and particularisation of repeated events in adults using a multi-method interviewing format", Memory, 29(4), pp.471~485 (2021)
  22. Lipton, J. P., "On the psychology of eyewitness testimony", Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(1), pp.90~ (1977)
  23. Loftus, E. F., "Eyewitness testimony: Psychological research and legal thought", Crime and justice, 3, pp.105~151 (1981)
  24. Loftus, E. F., "Mental shock can produce retrograde amnesia", Memory & Cognition, 10(4), pp.318~323 (1982)
  25. Loftus, E. F., "Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory", Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 13(5), pp.585~589 (1974)
  26. Memon, A., "The Cognitive Interview: A metaanalytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years", Psychology, public policy, and law, 16(4), pp.340~ (2010)
  27. Oberauer, K., "Accessing information in working memory: Can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), pp.64~ (2009)
  28. O'Neill Shermer, L., "Perceptions and credibility: Understanding the nuances of eyewitness testimony", Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(2), pp.183~203 (2011)
  29. Penrod, S. D., "The reliability of eyewitness testimony: A psychological perspective", The psychology of the courtroom, pp.119~168 (1982)
  30. Swallow, K. M., "Culture influences how people divide continuous sensory experience into events", Cognition, (104450), pp.205~ (2020)
  31. Tulving, E., "Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory", Psychological review, 80(5), pp.352~ (1973)
  32. Wells, G. L., "Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value", Psychological science in the public interest, 7(2), pp.45~75 (2006)
  33. Wheeler, R. L, "Using self-generated cues to facilitate recall: A narrative review", Frontiers in psychology, 8, pp.1830~ (2017)
  34. Zacks, J. M., "Event segmentation", Current directions in psychological science, 16(2), pp.80~84 (2007)
  35. Zacks, J. M., "Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events", Journal of experimental psychology: General, 130(1), pp.29~ (2001)
  36. "Impact Review: A Review of the Impact of CREST Research Projects" (2019)[URL]
  37. "Innocence project" (2023)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)