은행의 파생상품업에 대한「자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률」적용의 법적 문제
Legal Issues on Application of the "Capital Market Act" on a Bank's Financial Derivative Business in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
On February 4, 2009, the Act on the Capital Market and Financial Investment Business (hereinafter the "Capital Market Act") will become effective. One of the conspicuous features of the Capital Market Act is to pursue the so-called "functional regulation" system. Thus, as long as a bank is engaged in a financial investment business, which includes financial derivative business, such a bank will be subject to the Capital Market Act. It is noted that further, on such financial derivative business, a bank is regulated by the Bank Act. Hence, unlike a financial investment company, which will be only subject to the Capital Market Act, since a bank is regulated by such two laws, it would be big burdensome to the bank. This article is to review such legal issues arising from the application of the Capital Market Act on a bank's financial derivative business. First, the Capital Market Act allows a bank to continue its financial derivative business within the scope of the currently permitted business by filing a report to the regulator, even though, in fact, it is regarded as being almost equivalent to the approval system. Currently, a bank is allowed to engage in OTC financial derivative dealing and brokerage businesses according to the interpretation of the guideline of a bank's ancillary business. In addition, although more or less controversial, a bank is permitted to engaged in overseas on-exchange financial derivative dealing and brokerage to a limited extent. Therefore, a bank will be permitted to keep on engaging in such financial derivative businesses under the Capital Market Act. This article, however, argues for permitting a bank to conduct domestic on-exchange financial derivative dealing and brokerage businesses. In addition, still the problem of a double regulation exists: in other words, the Capital Market Act as well as the Bank Act will apply to a bank's financial derivative business. In order to rectify such problem, it is suggested that first, the regulator define its function clearly on regulating such a bank's activities, and in the long term, the project of consolidating the Capital Market Act, the Bank Act and the Insurance Business Act be pursued, which will allow an universal banking system in Korea and contribute to enhancing the financial industry overall.
참고문헌 (13)
- 高東源, "銀行의 派生金融商品 去來 規制에 관한 法的 檢討", 상사법연구, 24(1), pp.305~326 (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 고동원, "금융기관 신용파생상품 거래 규제의 현황 및 개선 방향", 금융시스템리뷰, (13) (2005), 한국은행
- 고동원, "금융기관 파생상품 거래 규제의 내용과 법제도적 개선 방향", 증권예탁, (63) (2007), 증권예탁결제원
- 금융감독위원회, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률(안)」에 대한 검토 결과", 보도자료, ~ (2006)
- 김홍기, "자본시장통합법상 파생상품 규제의 내용과 개선과제", 증권법연구, 9(1), pp.83~120 (2008), 한국증권법학회
- 신상준, "자본시장법 등 주요 금융관계법령 정비 내용", 조사통계월보 (2008)
- 윤창현, "신용파생상품 현황 및 활성화 방안", 신용파생상품을 이용한 신용위험 관리 강화방안 Workshop 발표 자료 (2004), 금융감독원[DOI]
- 이금호, "신용파생금융거래법론" (2007), 탐진
- 이금호, "신용파생금융거래 종류 및 이에 관한 법적 문제", 한국증권법학회 세미나 발표자료 (2008)
- 이준희, "신용파생상품시장의 활성화 방향 - 부도전염 및 신용위험관리를 중심으로", 금융리스크리뷰, (겨울) (2004), 한국예금보험공사
- 자본시장통합법연구회, "자본시장통합법 해설서" (2007), 한국증권업협회
- 재정경제부, "은행 부수업무 확대 및 정비", 보도참고자료, ~ (2003)
- 재정경제부, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 제정안", 설명 자료, ~ (2006)
