여말선초 사대부의 봉사시에 나타난 세계관 비교

Abstract

This thesis compares global outlooks of important diplomatic representatives of the Last years of the Goryeo , Jeong Mong Ju, Lee Seoung In, Jeong Do Jeon, and Gwan Gun through Envoy poetry. The contents of Envoy poetry are divided as things foreign, yearning for home, landmarks, a magnificent view of imperial metropolis. Jeong Mong Ju emphasized a magnificent view of imperial metropolis and an ability of an emperor. He thought that the writing of the world was identical, but the role of a representative was exhausting. It furtively reflected his dissatisfaction on the unstable world, and it could also read as the dissatisfaction on China, the center of the world of the time. Lee Seoung In thought the writing of the world was identical and the role of a representative was not exhausting. However, he criticized social conditions which changes everyday. He was unsatisfactory on the world, but it was not because of China, but it was the problem of him. Jeong Do Jeon praised a magnificent view of nature, represented the recognition of Common Written Language, and emphasized the historical instruction. He thought that the important thing was not an emperor or social conditions in China centered world, but doing something that could be remained in the history. Gwan Gun focused on dignified Ming dynasty and the role of retainers and had the recognition of National language. He emphasized the condition of every country and role of them rather than the centered view of China. For the establishment of the world view, Jeong Mong Ju emphasized the role of China, Lee Seoung In criticized the limitation of Koryo, Gwan Gun focused on the role of Chosun, and Jeong Do Jeon only stressed the achievement for the history rather than focusing on China or Chosun.