본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상사의 코칭이 부하직원들의 창의적 행동 제고에 미치는 영향 메커니즘에 대한 연구 : 자기효능감, 회복탄력성, 직무만족의 역할을 중심으로

Exploring the Mechanism of Supervisor's Coaching on Enhancing Creative Behavior of Subordinates : Focusing on the Roles of Self-efficacy, Resilience, and Job Satisfaction

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구에서는 상사의 코칭이 구성원들의 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향메커니즘을 탐색하고 구체적인 경로를 규명해내고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 관련된 문헌에 대한 고찰을 진행하였으며 이를 바탕으로 연구가설과 모형을 제시하였다. 실증분석은 기업에 재직하고 있는 직원들을 대상으로 하여 진행된 설문을 통해 획득된 데이터를 활용하였으며 연구변수들 간의 관계를 분석하기 위하여 구조방정식분석을 활용하였다. 연구결과를 살펴보면, 상사의 코칭은 구성원들의 자기효능감과 회복탄력성의 제고에 유의한 영향을 미쳤으며, 순차적으로 자기효능 감과 회복탄력성은 직무만족을 높여줬으며, 직무만족은 창의적 행동을 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 코칭은 자기효능감과 회복탄력성 그리고 직무만족을 거쳐서 간접적으로 유의하게 창의적 행동에 영향을 미침을 확인할 수 있었다. 한편, 상사의 코칭은 구성원들의 창의적 행동에 직접적으로도 유의한 영향을 미쳤다. 이러한 연구결과들은 상사의 코칭은 구성원들의 자기효능감, 회복탄력성, 직무만족에 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 뿐만 아니라 구성원들이 창의적 행동을 하는데 있어서 중요한 역할을 할 수 있음을 실증적으로 보여주었다.

Abstract

As it has been proven that coaching within an organization is an important factor influencing in various dimensions, the need for more extensive research is being raised, but empirical studies on coaching are relatively lacking. In particular, considering the situation in which organizations are demanding more creative behavior due to the recent transition to the 4th revolution era, it is judged that it is very timely to study the effect of coaching on creative behavior. Therefore, in this study, based on various studies on coaching within the organization that have been previously studied, if we explore the mechanism by which coaching of the superior affects the creative behavior of subordinates, it is possible to verify the influence of coaching on creative behavior. It is expected that it will be able to present a methodology for coaching to be conducted more effectively by identifying the paths leading to successful creative behavior. On the other hand, this study focused on factors such as self-efficacy, resilience, and job satisfaction as a path through which coaching can influence creative behavior. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence relationship of coaching within the organization on the creative behavior of employees, and to explore specific mechanisms from coaching to creative behavior. Through this, it is intended to clearly show whether coaching within an organization can be extended to creative behavior as an area that can have an impact, and to suggest implications for areas that should be paid attention to so that coaching can be used more effectively. In this study, the mechanism of supervisor's coaching on employees' creative behavior was explored and empirically investigated. To this end, a review of the related literature was conducted, and based on this, research hypotheses and models were presented. For the empirical analysis, data obtained through a questionnaire conducted on employees in the company was used, and structural equation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the research variables. Looking at the results of the study, coaching by the superior had a significant effect on the enhancement of self-efficacy and resilience of employees, and in turn, self-efficacy and resilience increased job satisfaction, and job satisfaction was found to improve creative behavior. Through this, it was confirmed that coaching affects creative behavior through self-efficacy, resilience, and job satisfaction. On the other hand, coaching by the boss directly had a significant effect on the creative behavior of the members. These research results empirically demonstrated that coaching by superiors not only positively affects members' self-efficacy, resilience, and job satisfaction, but also can play an important role in members' creative behavior. Based on the results of the study, the following implications for corporate management can be presented. First, it was confirmed that the coaching of the superior is not only an effective method for improving task performance, but a useful intervention that can be applied to the improvement of various aspects of subordinates. Summarizing the results of this study, it suggests that boss coaching can be actively used to induce creative behavior and can be an important tool that can be usefully used to improve self-efficacy and resilience. Next, it shows that coaching in the workplace can be an important factor worthy of being professional. There is still a lack of understanding of coaching in the business field, and there is a tendency to think that coaching is something that can be done naturally without much effort. Considering that it is an important means and can be a means that can also contribute to the enhancement of organizational effectiveness, it is necessary to introduce an education program and utilize an operating system to enable systematic coaching of managers in the workplace. It is also judged that it is desirable to include this coaching competency as an important factor in establishing the manager's evaluation and promotion system and to make institutional efforts to actively utilize it.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 김정식, "리더의 코칭과 부하직원들의 성과간의 관계에서 내재적 동기부여, 직무만족 및 직무몰입의 영향", 대한경영학회지, 25(2), pp.675~695 (2012), 대한경영학회[DOI]
  2. 김춘근, "기술창업기업 초기 성과에 미치는 영향요인 분석- 청년창업사관학교 졸업 기업을 대상으로 -", 기업경영연구, 21(5), pp.63~86 (2014), 한국기업경영학회
  3. 이가현, "코칭리더십이 인사담당자 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 긍정심리자본과 조직몰입의 매개 효과를 중심으로", 기업경영연구, 26(6), pp.51~71 (2019), 한국기업경영학회
  4. 임그린, "회복탄력성 증진을 위한 정서중심 그룹코칭의 효과성 연구", 한국심리학회지: 코칭, 3(1), pp.1~23 (2019), 한국코칭심리학회
  5. 홍의숙, "중소기업 리더 코칭이 직무관련 태도에 미치는 영향에관한 연구", 기업경영연구, 16(2), pp.259~275 (2009), 한국기업경영학회
  6. Amabile, T. M., "The social psychology of creativity" (1983), Springer-Verlag
  7. Amabile, T. M., "Motivation and creativity : Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp.393~399 (1985)
  8. Amabile, T. M., "A model of creativity and innovation in organizations", Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, pp.123~168 (1988)
  9. Amabile, T. M., "Creativity in context : Update to the social psychology of creativity" (1996), Westview Press
  10. Arnold, J. A., "The empowering leadership questionnaire : The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), pp.249~269 (2000)
  11. Bandura, A., "Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive theory" (1986), Prentice-hall
  12. Bandura, A., "Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), pp.805~814 (1989)
  13. Developmental managers: Line managers as facilitators of workplace learning in voluntary organisations, "Beattie, R. S.", University of Glasgow, ~ (2002)
  14. Deci, E. L., "Why we do what we do : Understanding self-motivation" (1995), Penquin
  15. Dinham, S., "Moving into the third, outer domain of teacher satisfaction", Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), pp.379~396 (2000)
  16. Ellinger, A. D., "Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and warehouse employee performance : A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry", Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), pp.435~458 (2003)
  17. Ellinger, A. E., "Market orientation, employee development practices, and performance in logistics service provider firms", Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), pp.353~366 (2008)
  18. Ellinger, A. M., "Managers as facilitators of learning in learning organizations", Doctor, pp.1997
  19. Fornell, C., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  20. Fredrickson, B. L., "The role of positive emotions in positive psychology : The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions", American Psychologist, 56(3), pp.218~226 (2001)
  21. Gardner, H., "Frames of mind : The theory of multiple intelligences" (1993), Basik Books
  22. Goldstein, S., "Handbook of resilience in children", pp.2009, Kluwer
  23. Grant, A., "The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of coaching and mentoring", pp.15~39 (2013), Wiley
  24. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2006), Prentice Hall
  25. Hamlin, R. G., "In support of universalistic models of managerial and leadership effectiveness : Implications for HRD research and practice", Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), pp.189~215 (2004)
  26. Howell, J. M., "Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation : Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), pp.891~902 (1993)
  27. Jones, G. R., "Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations", Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), pp.262~279 (1986)
  28. Jones, R. J., "The effectiveness of workplace coaching : A meta-analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89, pp.249~277 (2016)
  29. Lee, C., "Self-efficacy beliefs : Comparison of five measures", Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), pp.364~369 (1994)
  30. Locke, E. A., "Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology", pp.1297~1349 (1976), Rand McNally
  31. Lopez, S. J., "The encyclopedia of positive psychology" (2011), John Wiley & Sons
  32. Luthans, F., "Positive organizational behavior : Developing and managing psychological strengths", The Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), pp.57~72 (2002)
  33. Lopez, S. J., "Psychological capital : Developing the human competitive edge" (2007), Oxford University Press
  34. Maynard, M. T., "Team leader coaching intervention : An investigation of the impact on team processes and performance within a surgical context", Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), pp.1080~1092 (2021)
  35. Nielsen, K., "How do transformational leaders influence followers' affective well-being? Exploring the mediating role of self-efficacy", Work & Stress, 23(4), pp.313~329 (2009)
  36. O'Neill, B. S., "Investigating equity sensitivity as a moderator of relations between self-efficacy and workplace attitudes", Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), pp.805~816 (1998)
  37. Popper, M., "Coaching on leadership", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 13(7), pp.15~18 (1992)
  38. Sonesh, S. C., "The power of coaching: A meta-analytic investigation. Coaching", An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 8, pp.73~95 (2015)
  39. Zhou, J., "When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity : Encouraging the expression of voice", Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.682~696 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

코칭리더십이 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향: 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과성현정, 탁진국한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2017 · 제30권 제3호리더의 창의성이 종업원의 직무만족과 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 긍정심리자본과 창의적 자기효능감의 매개효과와 팀응집성의 조절된 매개효과를 중심으로강민정, 김지웅한국벤처창업학회 · 벤처창업연구2022 · 제17권 제3호국내 기업 근로자의 코칭리더십이 혁신적 업무행동에 미치는 영향: 업무그릿과 직무만족의 매개효과를 중심으로김우철, 윤재영, 전혜지한국인력개발학회 · HRD연구2025 · 제27권 제1호리더코칭과 조직신뢰에서 혁신행동의 경로 모형 탐색 : 직위안정성과 자기효능감의 조건부 효과 중심으로김도근, 이명자, 장선혜사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회 · 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지2019 · 제9권 제2호비인격적 감독이 창의성에 미치는 영향: 조직 냉소주의의 매개효과와 회복탄력성의 조절효과를 중심으로박인, 김상수, 정범구경영경제연구소 · 경영경제연구2019 · 제41권 제3호코칭리더십, 직무자율성, 자기효능감 및 개인창의성 간의 구조적 관계 분석: 재중 한국기업의 중국현지 근로자를 대상으로윤성환인문사회과학연구소 · 인문사회과학연구2024 · 제25권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)