한국희곡의 동양지향성과 오리엔탈리즘
The Oriented the East and Orientalism in Korean Plays in 1940s and 1970s
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the meanings of the tendencies for the East were appeared in the streams of modern Korean plays in 20th century. Especially, this trends of the oriented the East mainly apperared in 1940s and 1970s. In early 1940s, some colonial Korean playwrights tended to express 'Koreanness' in their works. At that time, Japanese empire encouraged for its colonial countries, including colonial Korea, to express and represent their national traditions, histories, cultures, the pasts in literal works, because it wanted to display the empire's cultural richness nd diversity through inside and outside. Japaness empire advocated Pan-Asianism which every Asian should to unite against to the West. So, it insisted on the value of the East(Asianness). In this situations, colonial Korean playwrights represented ancient Korean historical narratives(Maitaeja, Nakwbaam), classical narratives(Shimchongjeon, Chunhyangjeon), historical persons(Shinsaimdang, Kim Satgat) in their works. On the other hand, some Korean playwrights and directors pursued 'the oriental theatre' in 1970s. Some Korean directors and playwrights, such as Yoo Deokhyung, An minsoo, led to the trends for the oriental theatre in Korea in 1970s. They studied 'the oriental theatre' at the universities in the United States in late 1960s and early 1970s, were influenced from some western directors, who were interested in the oriental theatre and looked for the possibility of new theatre through the oriental theatre in 1960s, as like Jerzy Grotowski, Eugenio Barba, Peter Brook and so on. Especially, the works of Drama Center's directors and playwrights, as like Chobun, Hamyultaeja, appeared the affuences of these western dirctors's oriented oriental theatre. For example, these works represented the virtual Eastern world(westernized East, orientalized East) instead of real Eastern life.
참고문헌 (28)
- 드라마센터의 연출가들, "김숙현", 현대미학사, ~ (2005)
- 김숙현, "안민수 연출미학" (2007), 현대미학사
- 서연호, "동시대적 삶과 연극" (1988), 열음사
- 서연호, "우리연극 100년" (2000), 현암사
- 여석기, "동서연극의 비교연구" (1987), 고려대출판부
- 오태석, "오태석 연극:실험과 도전의 40년" (2002), 연극과인간
- 이상일, "한국연극의 문화형성력" (2000), 눈빛
- 임지현, "오만과 편견" (2003), 휴머니스트
- 고야스 노부투니, "동아,대동아,동아시아" (2005), 역사비평사
- 그로토프스키, 예지, "가난한 연극" (1987), 교보문고
- 나카무라 미츠오, "태평양전쟁의 사상" (2007), 이매진
- 다케우치 요시미, "일본과 아시아" (2004), 소명출판
- 맥킨지. 존, "오리엔탈리즘 : 예술과 역사" (2006), 문화디자인
- 브룩, 피터, "빈 공간" (1989), 청하
- 사이드, 에드워드, "오리엔탈리즘" (1991), 교보문고
- 사카이 나오키, "국민주의의 포에시스" (2003), 창비
- 요시미 순야, "박람회:근대의 시선" (2004), 논형
- Roose-Evanse. James, "Experimental Theatre" (1984), London : RKP
- 김남석, "오태석 초기작에 나타난 혼란 양상과 그 의미, 오태석공연대본전집(3)" (2003), 연극과인간
- 김미희, "문화상호주의연극, 보편성인가 문화제국주의인가」,『연극평론』, 2000년 겨울호", ~ (2000)
- 김방옥, "「문학적 연극의 위기」,『「약장수」,「신의 아그네스」, 그리고마당극』" (1989), 문음사
- 백현미, "민족적 전통과 동양적 전통,『해방전(1940-1945) 공연희곡과 상영 시나리오의 이해』," (2005), 형민사
- 신현숙, "연극에서의 문화상호주의에 관한 소고", 인문과학연구, (4) (1998), 덕성여대 인문과학연구소
- 이상우, "표상으로서의 망국사 이야기", 한국극예술연구, 25, pp.55~90 (2007), 한국극예술학회
- 정지창, "「모더니즘 연극의 수용과 극복」,『서사극, 마당극, 민족극』" (1989), 창작과 비평사
- 가라타니 고진, "미술관으로서의 역사, 창조된 고전" (2002), 소명출판
- 소잉카, 윌레, "「문학의 서쪽을 향한 정전, 동쪽을 향한 정전」,『경계를 넘어 글쓰기』" (2001), 민음사
- Park, Sang Mi, "The marking of a Cultural Icon for the Japanese Empire : Choe Seung-hui's U.S. Dance Tours and "New Asian Culture" in the 1930s and 1940s" (2006), Posilions 14:3, Duke University
