본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정지용 산수시에서 자연과 정신의 감각적 매개 양상 -'차다'라는 신체 감각을 중심으로

Sensual intermediation between Nature and Spirit in Jeong Jiyoung's 'Mountain-Water poetry'

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Against a position that views nature in Jiyong's 'Mountain-Water poetry' as a mere landscape, this paper examines specific various modes in which sense intermediates between nature and spirit. On the basis of the comparative interpretation on Jiyong's three poems, "Breakfast", "Spring snow", and "Rain", this paper brings out the different modes in which nature is related to the spirit, according as the speaker keeps his distance from landscape. As a result of this analysis, it is explained that Jiyong's 'Mountain-Water poetry' accomplishes its spirituality with sense on the particular principle. In "Breakfast", "Spring snow", and "Rain", all three poems are based on the spring as the time and the mountain as the space. They show symbolically Jiyong's ‘性情論’ in that the 'water'(the sound of flowing water, spring snow, and rain in each) excites spirituality that intermediates between the nature and a human being. First, in "Breakfast" and "Spring snow", the coldness of water is a sense that intermediates between the nature and the speaker by clearing barriers between both. Jiyong would get from the coldness a mental intention to keep noble-mindedness in his heart in spite of sufferings. These poems take a strategy that accomplishes spirituality with speaker's participation, so these have an unexpected direction to get the coldness from vitality of spring. On the contrary, "Rain" has an expected direction to shift from the coldness to the vitality of spring , because it takes a strategy that accomplishes spirituality in landscape for itself with projection of sense by hidden speaker. In this poem, vitality of spring shows activity of spirits by moving of water itself without intermediation of sense. In conclusion, Jiyong's 'Mountain-Water poetry' is a field that nature interacts with spirit in consensus by intermediation of sense. Jiyong turns toward spirit not from sense, but with sense. In the poetic world of Jiyong, Modernism and Spiritualism have the one origin in common which has grown up on the same ground of Sensualism.

Abstract

Against a position that views nature in Jiyong's 'Mountain-Water poetry' as a mere landscape, this paper examines specific various modes in which sense intermediates between nature and spirit. On the basis of the comparative interpretation on Jiyong's three poems, "Breakfast", "Spring snow", and "Rain", this paper brings out the different modes in which nature is related to the spirit, according as the speaker keeps his distance from landscape. As a result of this analysis, it is explained that Jiyong's 'Mountain-Water poetry' accomplishes its spirituality with sense on the particular principle. In "Breakfast", "Spring snow", and "Rain", all three poems are based on the spring as the time and the mountain as the space. They show symbolically Jiyong's ‘性情論’ in that the 'water'(the sound of flowing water, spring snow, and rain in each) excites spirituality that intermediates between the nature and a human being. First, in "Breakfast" and "Spring snow", the coldness of water is a sense that intermediates between the nature and the speaker by clearing barriers between both. Jiyong would get from the coldness a mental intention to keep noble-mindedness in his heart in spite of sufferings. These poems take a strategy that accomplishes spirituality with speaker's participation, so these have an unexpected direction to get the coldness from vitality of spring. On the contrary, "Rain" has an expected direction to shift from the coldness to the vitality of spring , because it takes a strategy that accomplishes spirituality in landscape for itself with projection of sense by hidden speaker. In this poem, vitality of spring shows activity of spirits by moving of water itself without intermediation of sense. In conclusion, Jiyong's 'Mountain-Water poetry' is a field that nature interacts with spirit in consensus by intermediation of sense. Jiyong turns toward spirit not from sense, but with sense. In the poetic world of Jiyong, Modernism and Spiritualism have the one origin in common which has grown up on the same ground of Sensualism.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 권영민, "정지용 詩 126편 다시 읽기" (2004), 민음사
  2. 이숭원, "원본 정지용시집" (2003), 깊은샘
  3. 정지용, "정지용 전집1" (2003), 민음사
  4. 정지용, "정지용 전집 2" (2003), 민음사
  5. 최동호, "정지용 사전" (2003), 고려대출판부
  6. 김신정, "‘미적인 것’의 이중성과 정지용의 시, in: 정지용의 문학세계연구" (2001), 깊은샘
  7. 김용희, "정지용 시의 미학성" (2004), 소명출판
  8. 김우창, "한국시와 형이상, in: 궁핍한 시대의 시인" (2007), 민음사
  9. 김유중, "정지용 시 정신의 본질", 한국문학이론과 비평, 7(2), pp.9~35 (2003), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  10. 박순원, "정지용 시에 나타난 색채어 연구", 비평문학, (24), pp.247~272 (2006), 한국비평문학회
  11. 여태천, "정지용 시어의 특성과 의미", 한국언어문학, (56), pp.247~274 (2006), 한국언어문학회
  12. 오탁번, "芝溶詩의 題材, 現代文學散藁" (1976), 고려대출판부
  13. 윤석산, "소월시와 지용시의 대비적 연구: 자연관을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1981
  14. 이근화, "정지용 시 연구", 석사, pp.2000
  15. 이남호, "한국 현대문학에 나타난 자연의 모습, in: 현대한국문학 100년" (1999), 민음사
  16. 이상숙, "“죵죵다리 깟칠한” 풍경과 “수척한” 물, in: 다시 읽는 정지용 시" (2003), 월인
  17. 이영섭, "東洋精神의 創造的 繼承과 無慾의 詩學: 鄭芝溶의 自然詩 硏究", 아시아문화연구, 11 (2006)
  18. 장경렬, "이미지즘의 원리와 시화일여론―정지용과 에즈라 파운드, 그리고 이미지즘", 작가세계 (1999)
  19. 조동일, "산수시의 경치, 흥취, 이치, in: 한국시가의 역사의식" (1993), 문예출판사
  20. 최동호, "鄭芝溶의 山水詩와 隱逸의 精神", 민족문화연구, (19) (1986), 고려대학교민족문화연구원
  21. 최동호, "정지용 산수시와 情·景의 시학―장경렬 교수의 「비」의 해석과 관련하여", 작가세계 (2000)
  22. 최동호, "정지용의 산수시와 성정의 시학―중국과 한국의 산수화론과 시적 미학", 시와시학 (2002)
  23. 최동호, "소묘된 풍경의 여백과 기운 생동의 미학", 어문연구, 50, pp.383~401 (2006), 어문연구학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)