Ethics and Responsibility of Scientific Researchers in a Pandemic Era
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to critique the links between science and scientific researchers, politics and capital surrounding vaccines and vaccination in a pandemic era. It also introduces standards for adapting ethical guidelines for research under public health emergencies to specific circumstances and contexts. It also introduces ethical standards to be applied to scientific research. that is, scientific relevance, social value, cooperative partnerships, reasonable risk-benefit costs, fair and voluntary participation, independent review, and equal moral respect for participants and affected communities. It also outlines the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic-consent and other research procedure modifications proposed by Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). We are on the lookout for powerful capital and hegemonic groups inseparable from politics and important decision makers in the pandemic era - that is, scientists, supporters, and scientific civic groups. It underscores the need for an independent and formal scientific advisory body with the right balance between science and politics.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to critique the links between science and scientific researchers, politics and capital surrounding vaccines and vaccination in a pandemic era. It also introduces standards for adapting ethical guidelines for research under public health emergencies to specific circumstances and contexts. It also introduces ethical standards to be applied to scientific research. that is, scientific relevance, social value, cooperative partnerships, reasonable risk-benefit costs, fair and voluntary participation, independent review, and equal moral respect for participants and affected communities. It also outlines the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic-consent and other research procedure modifications proposed by Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). We are on the lookout for powerful capital and hegemonic groups inseparable from politics and important decision makers in the pandemic era - that is, scientists, supporters, and scientific civic groups. It underscores the need for an independent and formal scientific advisory body with the right balance between science and politics.
참고문헌 (12)
- "COVID-19 pandemic: Modifications to consent and other research procedures" (2020)[URL]
- "Ethical standards for research during public health emergencies" (2020)[URL]
- Freidson E, "Professionalism: The third logic", pp.111~156 (2001), University of Chicago Press
- "Why ‘vaccine is science’ but ‘vaccination’ is not science" (2021)[URL]
- "Why are German-speaking countries so low in vaccination rates?" (2021)[URL]
- "Merriam-Webster, a US dictionary company, named ‘vaccine’ as ‘word of the year’" (2021)[URL]
- "A biological experiment nightmare... Why Omicron is rooted in Africa" (2021)[URL]
- "“Corona lasts at least 5 more years”... I have a gloomy prospect" (2021)[URL]
- 이경희, "Conflict of Interersts in Scientific Study and Bioethics as Professionalism", 발생과 생식, 17(4), pp.477~482 (2013), 한국발생생물학회[DOI]
- 이경희, "Science and Politics, Ethics of Scientist", 倫理硏究, 1(113), pp.135~157 (2017), 한국윤리학회[DOI]
- "Merriam-Webster’s word of the year is ‘vaccine’... “The cause of political division and the medical solution”" (2021)[URL]
- "COVID-19 Pandemic - Modifying consent and other study procedures" (2020)[URL]
