일상생활 수행능력 평가도구의 유효성 분석 연구
Validation of the Measures for Activities of Daily Living Function: the Korean Version of the University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The study’s aim was to evaluate the validity of the Korean version of the University of California San Diego Performance- based Skills Assessment, Validation of Intermediate Measures (K-UPSA-2-VIM) in patients with dementia (D), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitive normal control group (CN). Methods: Study participants were 25 patients with D, 43 patients with MCI, and 111 controls with CN group, respectively. For cognitive assessment, Mini Mental State Examination, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease neuropsychological battery, and Clinical Dementia Rating were used. For functional assessment, Barthel-Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Dementia Screening questionnaire, and K-UPSA-2-VIM were used. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in all subdomains and total score of the K-UPSA-2-VIM among three cognitive groups. K-UPSA-2-VIM demonstrated 75.7% of sensitivity and 65.1% of specificity, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.731 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.641-0.821, p<0.001) in discriminating between CN and MCI groups. In discriminating between MCI and D groups, 76.7% of sensitivity and 64.0% of specificity, with an AUC of 0.706 (95% CI: 0.580-0.833, p=0.005) were demonstrated. Conclusion: The K-UPSA-2-VIM is useful to evaluate activities of daily living function in Korean patients with D and MCI.
Abstract
Objective: The study’s aim was to evaluate the validity of the Korean version of the University of California San Diego Performance- based Skills Assessment, Validation of Intermediate Measures (K-UPSA-2-VIM) in patients with dementia (D), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitive normal control group (CN). Methods: Study participants were 25 patients with D, 43 patients with MCI, and 111 controls with CN group, respectively. For cognitive assessment, Mini Mental State Examination, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease neuropsychological battery, and Clinical Dementia Rating were used. For functional assessment, Barthel-Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Dementia Screening questionnaire, and K-UPSA-2-VIM were used. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in all subdomains and total score of the K-UPSA-2-VIM among three cognitive groups. K-UPSA-2-VIM demonstrated 75.7% of sensitivity and 65.1% of specificity, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.731 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.641-0.821, p<0.001) in discriminating between CN and MCI groups. In discriminating between MCI and D groups, 76.7% of sensitivity and 64.0% of specificity, with an AUC of 0.706 (95% CI: 0.580-0.833, p=0.005) were demonstrated. Conclusion: The K-UPSA-2-VIM is useful to evaluate activities of daily living function in Korean patients with D and MCI.
참고문헌 (32)
- Andersen CK, "Ability to perform activities of daily living is the main factor affecting quality of life in patients with dementia", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2, pp.52~ (2004)
- Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, "American Psychiatric Association", American Psychiatric Association, ~ (2013)
- Mahoney FI, "Functional evaluation : the Barthel index", Md State Med J, 14, pp.61~65 (1965)
- Lawton MP, "Assessment of older people : self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living", Gerontologist, 9, pp.179~186 (1969)
- Argüelles S, "Caregivers’judgments of the functional abilities of the Alzheimer’s disease patient : impact of caregivers’ depression and perceived burden", J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 14, pp.91~98 (2001)
- Patterson TL, "UCSD performance-based skills assessment : development of a new measure of everyday functioning for severely mentally ill adults", Schizophr Bull, 27, pp.235~245 (2001)
- Patterson TL, "Measurement of functional capacity : a new approach to understanding functional differences and realworld behavioral adaptation in those with mental illness", Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 6, pp.139~154 (2010)
- Sung Jin Kim, "The Korean Version of the University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment: Reliability and Validity", Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience, 15(3), pp.261~268 (2017), 대한정신약물학회[DOI]
- Garcia-Portilla MP, "Validation of a European Spanish-version of the University of California performance skills assessment(Sp-UPSA)in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder", Schizophr Res, 150, pp.421~426 (2013)
- Wang LJ, "Validation of the Chinese version of brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia", Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 12, pp.2819~2826 (2016)
- Sumiyoshi C, "Utility of the UCSD performance-based skills assessment-brief Japanese version : discriminative ability and relation to neurocognition", Schizophr Res Cogn, 1, pp.137~143 (2014)
- Mantovani LM, "UCSD performance-based skills assessment(UPSA) : validation of a Brazilian version in patients with schizophrenia", Schizophr Res Cogn, 2, pp.20~25 (2015)
- Gomar JJ, "Development and cross-validation of the UPSA short form for the performance-based functional assessment of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease", Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 19, pp.915~922 (2011)
- Goldberg TE, "Performance-based measures of everyday function in mild cognitive impairment", Am J Psychiatry, 167, pp.845~853 (2010)
- Jeon DW, "Usefulness of the University of California San Diego performancebased skills assessment for the evaluation of cognitive function and activities of daily living function in patients with cognitive impairment", Aging Ment Health, 23, pp.46~52 (2019)
- Patterson TL, "The UCSD performance-based skills assessment administration manual (UPSA-2)" (2005), University of California
- Kim K, "Validation of the Korean version of the University of California San Diego performance-based skills assessment for high-functional capacity in the elderly", Int J Gerontol, 16, pp.116~121 (2022)
- Lee JH, "Development of the Korean version of the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease assessment packet(CERAD-K) : clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries", J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 57, pp.47~53 (2002)
- Morris JC, "The clinical dementia rating(CDR) : current version and scoring rules", Neurology, 43, pp.2412~2414 (1993)
- 강수진, "한국판 Instrumental Activities of Dalily Living의 타당도와 신뢰도", 대한신경과학회지, 20(1), pp.8~14 (2002), 대한신경과학회
- 양동원, "Korean Dementia Screeing Questionnaire (KDSQ)의 개발과 타당도 및 신뢰도의 평가", 대한신경과학회지, 20(2), pp.135~141 (2002), 대한신경과학회
- Bae JN, "Development of the Korean version of the geriatric depression scale and its short form among elderly psychiatric patients", J Psychosom Res, 57, pp.297~305 (2004)
- Folstein MF, "“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician", J Psychiatr Res, 12, pp.189~198 (1975)
- Kang YW, "Korean-mini mental state examination" (2020), Inpsyt, Inc
- Fawcett T, "An introduction to ROC analysis", Pattern Recognit Lett, 27, pp.861~874 (2006)
- Miska L, "Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping", Geomorphology, 67, pp.299~315 (2005)
- Swets JA, "Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems", Science, 240, pp.1285~1293 (1988)
- Tombaugh TN, "The mini-mental state examination : a comprehensive review", J Am Geriatr Soc, 40, pp.922~935 (1992)
- Karrasch M, "CERAD test performances in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease", Acta Neurol Scand, 111, pp.172~179 (2005)
- Jefferson AL, "Characterization of activities of daily living in individuals with mild cognitive impairment", Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 16, pp.375~383 (2008)
- McDaniel KD, "Relationship between level of insight and severity of dementia in Alzheimer disease", Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 9, pp.101~104 (1995)
- Baek MJ, "The study about the validity and clinical usefulness of the Korean version of the mini-mental state examination-2", pp.2018