본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해킹미수 처벌 논의에 대한 고찰

A Study on Discussion of the Attempted Hacking Penal Measure

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

When we describe a "hacker" in 21st century, we often refer to someone who tries to break into confidential computer systems. According to the current phenomenon of cyberspace expansion, the hackers have not only broadened their spatial boundaries, but also intensified the strength of the attack. Especially, the number of DDoS-Attack in prior years have been in steady inclination worldwide and its damage was of serious level. However, current prevention, detection, and investigation methodology and/or penal measure specified mainly for attempted hacking is suffering from its shortcomings. As the investigative agency acknowledged that these processes have become more intricate over the years, they have planned to punish hacking in pre-criminalization stage. During the discussion, the legislation of penal measure on attempted hacking has been a part of the debate. However, the range of discussion on attempted hacking is limited mainly for two of the following reasons. First, most of hacking process reach completion, because the hacker's engineering skill is, so called, an ‘Elite level.’ Second, it is not easy for investigation agency to charge a hacker with attempted hacking, because the operation time of the attack is ambiguous. Therefore, it is a rather difficult process to implement efficient penal measure for such narrow boundary of attempted hacking. As a result, one of the recommendations was to punish the preparation of hacking, rather than attempted hacking. However, number of scholars put forward counter-arguments to the punishment of the preparation of hacking. Nevertheless, with evidences from previous investigation practices and advocation of numerous scholars, regulation for preparation hacking was introduced. Procedures of hacking is becoming more organized, intelligent, and dangerous as we are reaching towards the "Software Era." It is necessary to inflict severe punishment on the conduct of hacking. As a conclusion, we should discuss the introduction of regulation of preparation of hacking in depth rather than its principle and theory.

Abstract

When we describe a "hacker" in 21st century, we often refer to someone who tries to break into confidential computer systems. According to the current phenomenon of cyberspace expansion, the hackers have not only broadened their spatial boundaries, but also intensified the strength of the attack. Especially, the number of DDoS-Attack in prior years have been in steady inclination worldwide and its damage was of serious level. However, current prevention, detection, and investigation methodology and/or penal measure specified mainly for attempted hacking is suffering from its shortcomings. As the investigative agency acknowledged that these processes have become more intricate over the years, they have planned to punish hacking in pre-criminalization stage. During the discussion, the legislation of penal measure on attempted hacking has been a part of the debate. However, the range of discussion on attempted hacking is limited mainly for two of the following reasons. First, most of hacking process reach completion, because the hacker's engineering skill is, so called, an ‘Elite level.’ Second, it is not easy for investigation agency to charge a hacker with attempted hacking, because the operation time of the attack is ambiguous. Therefore, it is a rather difficult process to implement efficient penal measure for such narrow boundary of attempted hacking. As a result, one of the recommendations was to punish the preparation of hacking, rather than attempted hacking. However, number of scholars put forward counter-arguments to the punishment of the preparation of hacking. Nevertheless, with evidences from previous investigation practices and advocation of numerous scholars, regulation for preparation hacking was introduced. Procedures of hacking is becoming more organized, intelligent, and dangerous as we are reaching towards the "Software Era." It is necessary to inflict severe punishment on the conduct of hacking. As a conclusion, we should discuss the introduction of regulation of preparation of hacking in depth rather than its principle and theory.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 2009 정보시스템 해킹·바이러스 현황 및 대응, "한국인터넷진흥원", 44~ (2009)
  2. 최정호, "사이버테러리즘의 변천방향과 한국의 대응", 2008 국방안보학술회의, pp.159~ (2008)
  3. 이원상, "해킹의 전단계 범죄화와 일상영역화", 안암법학, (28), pp.282~315 (2009), 안암법학회
  4. 배종대, "형법각론(제7판)", pp.15~58 (2011)
  5. 전용희, "DDoS 공격 및 대응 기법 분류", 정보보호학회지, 19(3), pp.46~ (2009)
  6. "시만텍의 정부/공공기관 인터넷 보안 위험 보고서"[URL]
  7. "안철수 연구소 특별 보고서"[URL]
  8. "해커 및 해킹 기법 수준 분류"[URL]
  9. "한국인터넷진흥원 홈페이지"[URL]
  10. 정진근, "스마트폰에서의 법적 문제", 제4회 저작권 포럼 “스마트폰과 저작권” 자료집, pp.24~ (2010)
  11. 이도구, "스마트폰 방송 저작권 침해 사례", 제4회 저작권 포럼 “스마트폰과 저작권” 자료집, pp.1~ (2010)
  12. 사이버범죄의 새로운 유형과 형사정책적 대안연구, "이원상", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2011)
  13. 배종대, "형법총론(제10판)", pp.8~109 (2011), 홍문사
  14. Gröseling, "Hacking und Computerspionage : Auswirkungen des 41. StrAndG zur Bekömpfung der Computerkriminalität", MMR, pp.550~ (2007)
  15. 박희영, "독일의 컴퓨터 범죄 방지에 관한 개정 형법의 분석 및 평가", 선진상사법률연구, (40), pp.75~100 (2007), 법무부
  16. Schnabl, "Strafbarkeit des Hacking - Begriff und Meinungsstand", wistra, 214~ (2004)
  17. Hilgendorf, "Computer- und Internetstrafrecht", 184~ (2005)
  18. Hilgendorf, "Grundfälle zum Computerstrafrecht", Jus, 702~705 (1996)
  19. "BT-Drucks. 10", 5058, pp.28~
  20. "BT-Drs. 16", 3656, pp.11~
  21. Gröseling, "Computersabotage und Vorfeldkriminalisierung", MMR, pp.628~ (2007)
  22. Borges, "Bekämpfung der Computerkriminalität. Zum Entwurf eines Strafrechtsäderungsgesetzes zur Bekämpfung der Computerkriminalität", DuD, 275~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (37건)