지적행정에서 국민의 권리구제 방안 연구

Abstract

This study examines the current status of the related rights remedies system, the Cadastral Committee(cadastral surveying suitability review), the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission(grievance complaints), the Administrative Adjudication Committee(administrative adjudication), the Court(administrative litigation), the Constitutional Court(constitutional complaint adjudication) for resolving the inconveniences related to cadastral administration of the people, and draws out problems and improvement plans. As a result of the analysis, it is necessary to expand the disposition of the cadastral administration and the cadastral committee through the revision of the 「Spatial Data Management Act」 because there is no other way to remedy the rights when the cadastral surveying suitability review has been passed. Second, there is no enforcement agency in the the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission's recommendations, so it is necessary to prepare a system to secure the ability to implement decisions and recruit dedicated civil servants. Third, since the results of processing are different for each provincial administrative adjudication committee, it is necessary to share the work processing methods and processing results by provinces and provinces. Fourth, the subjects of rights remedies related to cadastral administration are different from each other. However, due to insufficient information provided, it is causing confusion to the public and public officials in charge. A system that can guide this to the public and a system for mutual cooperation and information exchange between public officials dealing with rights remedies should be established.