THE PARADOX OF BOARD STRUCTURE CHANGE
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Drawing on both agency and stewardship theories, we examine the changes made to board structures in response to deregulation and the consequences of those observed changes on firm performance. We test the hypotheses using longitudinal data from the U.S. banking industry over the period 1981-1992, a noted era of deregulation. The results yield rather paradoxical outcomes. Changes in board structures appear to follow stewardship theory logic but firm performance is better among banks that appear to rely on agency theory logic. Finally, the results indicate that board equity ownership moderates the relationship between board structures and firm performance within the context of deregulation.
Abstract
Drawing on both agency and stewardship theories, we examine the changes made to board structures in response to deregulation and the consequences of those observed changes on firm performance. We test the hypotheses using longitudinal data from the U.S. banking industry over the period 1981-1992, a noted era of deregulation. The results yield rather paradoxical outcomes. Changes in board structures appear to follow stewardship theory logic but firm performance is better among banks that appear to rely on agency theory logic. Finally, the results indicate that board equity ownership moderates the relationship between board structures and firm performance within the context of deregulation.
참고문헌 (88)
- Aiken, L.S, "Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions" (1991), Sage
- Arrow, K., "The economics of agency, In Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business", pp.37~51 (1985), Harvard Business School Press
- Baligar, B., "CEO Duality and firm performance:What’s the fuss?", StrategicManagement Journal, 17, pp.41~53 (1996)
- Bantel, K. A., "Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?", Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp.107~124 (1989)
- Baysinger, B. D., "Effects of board andownership structure on corporateRandD strategy", Academy ofManagement Journal, 34, pp.205~214 (1991)
- Beatty R.P, "Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings", Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp.313~335 (1994)
- Bergh, D. D., "Problems with repeated measures analysis: Demonstration with a study of the diversification and performance relationship", Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), pp.1692~1708 (1995)
- Berle, A.A., "The Modern Corporation and Private Property" (1932), Commerce Clearing House
- Bethel, J.E, "The effects of ownership structure on corporate restructuring", Strategic Management Journal, 14(4), pp.15~31 (1993)
- Boyd, B. K., "CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model", Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp.301~312 (1995)
- Seung Ah Theresa Cho, "Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation", ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 17(4), pp.453~469, INST OPERATIONS RESEARCH MANAGEMENT SCIENCES
- Cortina, J. M., "Big things have small beginnings: An assortment of "minor" methodological misunderstandings", Journal of Management, 28, pp.339~362 (2002)
- Crawford, A. J., "Bank CEO pay-performancerelations and the effects ofderegulation", Journal of Business, 68, pp.231~256 (1995)
- Daily, C. M., "Bankruptcy and corporategovernance: The impact of boardcomposition and structure", Academyof Management Journal, 37, pp.1603~1617 (1994)
- Dalton, D. R., "Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance", Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), pp.269~290 (1998)
- Dalton, D. R., "Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis", Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), pp.674~686 (1999)
- Davidson, W.N, "Succession planning vs. agencytheory: A test of Harris and Helfat'sinterpretation of pluralityannouncement market returns", Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), pp.179~184 (2001)
- Davis, J.H., "Toward a stewardship theoryof management", Academy ofManagement Review, 22(1), pp.20~47 (1997)
- Deephouse, D. L., "To be different, or to be the same: It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance", Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), pp.147~166 (1999)
- Delmas, M., "Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry", Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), pp.189~209 (2007)
- Delmas, M., "Deregulation, governance structures,and efficiency: The U.S. electricutility sector", Strategic ManagementJournal, 26, pp.441~460 (2005)
- Donaldson, L., "The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory", Academy of Management Review, 15, pp.369~381 (1990)
- Donaldson, L., "Stewardship theory or agencytheory: CEO governance andshareholder returns", AustralianJournal of Management, 16(1), pp.49~64 (1991)
- Eisenhardt, K. M., "Agency theory: An assessment and review", Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp.57~74 (1989)
- Eisenhardt, K.M., "Dynamic capabilities: What arethey?", Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.1105~1121 (2000)
- Fama, E.F., "Separation of ownership and control", Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp.301~325 (1983)
- Festinger, L., "A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance" (1957), Row, Peterson
- Finkelstein, S., "CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command", Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.1079~1108 (1994)
- Forbes, D.P., "Cognition and corporate governance:Understanding boards of directorsand strategic decision-makinggroups", Academy of ManagementReview, 24(3), pp.489~505 (1999)
- Gart, A., "Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: The Future of the Banking, Insurance, and Securities Industries" (1994), John Wiley and Sons Inc
- Ginsberg, A, "Converting to for-profit status:Corporate responsiveness to radicalchange", Academy of ManagementJournal, 33(3), pp.445~477 (1990)
- Goodstein, J., "Turbulence at the top: A newperspective on governance structurechanges and strategic changes", Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp.306~330 (1991)
- Goodstein, J., "The effects of board size anddiversity on strategic change", Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.241~250 (1994)
- Grucia, T.S., "Regulatory change, constraints on adaptation and organizational failure: An empirical analysis of acute care hospitals", Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.345~363 (1994)
- Hambrick, D.C, "Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes, In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.9", pp.369~406 (1987), JAI Press
- Haveman, H. A., "Organization environments influx: The impact of regulatoryfluctuations on organizationaldomains, CEO succession, andperformance", Organization Science, 12(3), pp.253~273 (2001)
- Henderson, A.D, "Information-processing demands asa determinant of CEOcompensation", Academy ofManagement Journal, 39, pp.575~607 (1996)
- Hillman, A. J., "The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change", Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), pp.235~255 (2000)
- Hillman, A.J., "Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives", Academy of Management Review, 28(3), pp.383~396 (2003)
- Hubbard, R, "Executive pay and performance: Evidence from the U.S. banking industry", Journal of Financial Economics, 38, pp.105~130 (1995)
- Janis, I. L., "Groupthink" (1982), Houghton-Mifflin
- Jensen, M. C., "Presidential address: The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems", Journal of Finance, 48, pp.831~880 (1993)
- Jensen, M.C., "Theory of the firm: Managerialbehavior, agency costs andownership structure", Journal ofFinancial Economics, 3(4), pp.305~360 (1976)
- Joskow, P. A., "Regulation and Deregulation after 25 Years: Lessons Learned for Research in Industrial Organization", Review of Industrial Organization, 26(2), pp.169~193 (2005)
- Judge, W.O., "Institutional and strategic choiceperspectives on board involvement inthe strategic decision process", Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp.766~794 (1992)
- Juskow, P., "Regulatory constraints on CEOcompensation, In Brookings Papers onEconomic Activity", pp.1~72 (1993), Microeconomics
- Kang, E, "Board leadership structure and firm performance", Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), pp.785~799 (2005)
- Kennedy, P., "A Guide to Econometrics" (1998), Blackwell
- Kesner, I. F., "Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender", Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), pp.66~84 (1988)
- 김봉진, "Deregulatory forms, variations in the speed of governance adaptation, and firm performance", ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 30(2), pp.414~425, ACAD MANAGEMENT
- Kole, S.R, "Deregulation and the adaptation ofgovernance structure: The case of theUS airline industry", Journal ofFinancial Economics, 52(1), pp.79~111 (1999)
- Kosnik, R. D., "Effects of board demography and directors’ incentives on corporate greenmail decisions", Academy of Management Journal, 33, pp.129~150 (1990)
- Kroll, M., "The impact of board composition and top management team ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms", Academy of Management Journal, 50, pp.1198~1216 (2007)
- Lin, Y. F., "Corporate governance, leadership structure, and CEO compensation: Evidence from Taiwan", Corporate Governance, 13(6), pp.824~835 (2005)
- Lynall, M. D., "Board composition fromadolescence to maturity: Amultitheoretic view", Academy ofManagement Review, 28, pp.416~431 (2003)
- Mallette, P., "Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of “poison pills", Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp.1010~1035 (1992)
- Mallette, P., "Board composition, stock ownership and the exemption of directors from liability", Journal of Management, 21, pp.861~878 (1995)
- Markus, G. B., "Analyzing Panel Data" (1979), Sage
- McCall, R.B, "Bias in the analysis of repeated measures designs: Some alternative approaches", Child Development, 44, pp.401~415 (1973)
- McNamara, G., "Competitive positioning within and across a strategic group structure: The performance of core, secondary, and solitary firms", Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), pp.161~181 (2003)
- Mehra, A., "Resource and market based determinants of performance in the US banking industry", Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.307~322 (1996)
- Meyer, A. D., "Adapting to environmental jolts", Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, pp.515~537 (1982)
- Miller, D., "Learning across the life cycle : Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads", Strategic Management Journal, 22(8), pp.725~ (2001)
- Mizruchi, M. S., "Who controls whom? An experimentation of the relation between management and boards of directors in large American corporations", Academy of Management Review, 8, pp.426~435 (1983)
- Muth, M.M., "Stewardship theory and boardstructure: A contingency approach", Corporate Governance, 6, pp.5~28 (1998)
- Nickerson, J., "Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry", Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, pp.433~465 (2003)
- O’Reilly, C. A., "Work group demography,social integration, and turnover", Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, pp.21~37 (1989)
- RegulatoryreformintheUnitedStates, "OECD", Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ~ (1999)
- Pfeffer, J., "The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective" (1978), Harper and Row
- Rajagopalan, N, "Effects of strategic orientation andenvironmental change on seniormanagement reward systems", Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp.127~142 (1992)
- Ramaswami, K., "The performance impact of strategic similarity in horizontal mergers: Evidence from the US banking industry", Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), pp.697~715 (1997)
- Ramaswami, K., "Organizational ownership, competitive intensity, and firm performance: An empirical study of the Indian manufacturing sector", Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.989~998 (2001)
- Reger, R. K., "Deregulation, strategic choice,risk and financial performance", Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp.189~204 (1992)
- Richard, O. C., "Radical diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resources-based view", Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), pp.164~177 (2000)
- Rose, P. S., "The Interstate Banking Revolution: Benefits, Risks, and Tradeoffs for Bankers and Consumers" (1989), Quorum
- Roussakis, E. N., "Commercial Banking in an Era of Deregulation" (1997), Praeger
- STAT Users Guide, Version 6(4th ed.,Vol.2), "SAS", pp.1989, SAS Institute, I.
- Saunders, A., "Ownership structure, deregulation,and bank risk taking", Journal ofFinance, 45, pp.643~654 (1990)
- Sayrs, L. W., "Pooled Time Series Analysis" (1989), Sage
- Seung Ah Theresa Cho, "Exploring involuntary executive turnover through a managerial discretion framework", ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 30(4), pp.843~854, ACAD MANAGEMENT
- Singh, H, "Management-board relationships,takeover risk, and the adoption ofgolden parachutes", Academy ofManagement Journal, 32(1), pp.7~24 (1989)
- Smith, C.W, "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policy", Journal of Financial Economics, 32, pp.263~292 (1992)
- Spender, J. C., "Industry Recipes: The Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgment" (1989), Blackwell
- Staw, B. M., "Threat-rigidity effect inorganizational behavior: A multilevel analysis", Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 26(4), pp.501~525 (1981)
- Sundaramurthy, C, "Control and collaboration: Paradoxesof governance", Academy of ManagementReview, 28(3), pp.397~415 (2003)
- Walsh, J.P., "On the efficacy of internal an external corporate control mechanisms", Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, pp.421~458 (1990)
- Wiersema, M.F., "Top management team demography and corporate strategic change", Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), pp.91~121 (1992)
- Williamson, O. E., "Corporate governance", Yale Law Journal, 93, pp.1197~1230 (1984)
