본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

광고 텍스트의 중의성 연구

A Study on the Ambiguity of Advertisement Texts

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Abstract

The present study purposed to examine the types of ambiguity used in advertisement texts and how the ambiguity contributes to the achievement of the goal of advertisement texts, which is to induce curiosity in consumers. Ambiguity means that a sentence is understood as two or more meanings and this causes confusion in communication. Types of ambiguity used strategically in advertisement texts are ‘lexical ambiguity,’ ‘metaphorical ambiguity,’ ‘idiomatic ambiguity,’ ‘pragmatic ambiguity,’ etc. Lexical ambiguity draws laugh through puns using homonyms and equivocal words. Consumers’ interest is concentrated on the process of resolving the ambiguity. Metaphorical ambiguity is utilized frequently in advertisement texts because of its advantage in suggestiveness. Particularly in advertisement texts stimulating consumers’ sexual curiosity, metaphorical ambiguity is commonly used to express sexual organs or sexual acts indirectly or to make sexual suggestions. Idiomatic ambiguity is used in the advertisement strategy that first induces curiosity in consumers by reminding them of an idiomatic meaning and then expresses the characteristic of the product in the literal meaning. Pragmatic ambiguity comes from difference in interpretation according to situation or context, and contributes to the creation of advertisement texts a level higher than lexical ambiguity. In general, ambiguity is regarded as an obstacle in communication and communication theories emphasize the exclusion of ambiguity. In advertisement texts, however, ambiguity contributes to advertisers’ intentional strategy for stimulating consumers’ interest and impressing products on their mind.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 곽재용, "국어의 중의성 연구" (1988)
  2. 구명철, "광고문에 나타난 언어유희적 특성-독일어 광고문과 우리나라광고문의 사례를 중심으로", 3(1), pp.62~1 87 (2001), 한국광고홍보학회
  3. 문금현, "광고문에 나오는 간접표현의 의미 분석", 한국어 의미학, 10, pp.73~96 (2002), 한국어의미학회
  4. 박영순, "중의문의 의미에 대하여", pp.493~507 (1998), 박이정
  5. 박영순, "한국어 은유 연구" (2000), 고려대학교 출판부
  6. 박영준, "광고언어연구" (2003), 박이정
  7. 박종갑, "토론식 강의를 위한 국어의미론, 개정판" (2003), 박이정
  8. 이석규, "텍스트 분석의 실제" (2003), 역락
  9. 이재원, "광고언어연구 , 3판 개정판" (2005), 한성문화
  10. 이현우, "광고와 언어" (1998), 커뮤니케이션북스
  11. 임지룡, "인지 의미론" (1997), 탑 출판사
  12. 정동규, "광고언어에서의 단어유희", 2, pp.185~206 (2000), 한국독어학회
  13. 최형용, "광고 전략과 언어적 중의성", 9, pp.169~193 (2000), 한국텍스트언어학회
  14. 한성일, "웃음 유발의 책략으로서의 중의성 연구", pp.195~221 (2003), 역락
  15. 한성일, "인터넷 언어유희에 대한 사회언어학적 연구", pp.109~132 (2005)
  16. Janich, N, "Werbesprache, Gunter Nar" (1999), Tingen
  17. Women, "The university of Chicago" (1987)
  18. Johnson, "University of Chicago Press" (1980)
  19. Lyons, J, "Linguistic Semantics" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  20. A, "The Language of Riddle" (1984), Ohio State University Press
  21. 남기탁?김문태 공역, "??수수께끼의 언어??" (1993), 강원대출판부
  22. 정동규, "독일의 광고와 언어" (2003), 한국문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)