The Development of Audience Awareness Through Online Synchronous Teacher-Learner Conference
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The teacher-learner writing conference has been researched with a focus on the teacher’s delivery of corrective feedback regarding surface features such as mistakes in grammar and mechanics. The conference took on a unilateral form where the teacher provides feedback and the learner receives it. However, writing is a social act which fundamentally involves a meaning negotiation process between a writer and a reader, and increasingly written communication is taking place in an online environment in both synchronous and asynchronous ways. This qualitative study aimed to investigate how an online collaborative teacher-learner writing conference using a synchronous chat program raises three L2 university learners’ audience awareness and how the awareness is represented in their revisions. Data sources include learners’ reflection journals, chat-logs during the conference, and three writing drafts from each learner. The results indicated that learners showed increased awareness of audience with the process positively affecting their revisions both at macrostructure and microstructure levels. Additionally, certain types of voice as a writer addressing the audience emerged at both levels. The study has research implications for the role of L2 raising audience awareness in developing the L2 writing process and how conference interaction can be effectively promoted through collaborative negotiation. Pedagogical implications are discussed.
Abstract
The teacher-learner writing conference has been researched with a focus on the teacher’s delivery of corrective feedback regarding surface features such as mistakes in grammar and mechanics. The conference took on a unilateral form where the teacher provides feedback and the learner receives it. However, writing is a social act which fundamentally involves a meaning negotiation process between a writer and a reader, and increasingly written communication is taking place in an online environment in both synchronous and asynchronous ways. This qualitative study aimed to investigate how an online collaborative teacher-learner writing conference using a synchronous chat program raises three L2 university learners’ audience awareness and how the awareness is represented in their revisions. Data sources include learners’ reflection journals, chat-logs during the conference, and three writing drafts from each learner. The results indicated that learners showed increased awareness of audience with the process positively affecting their revisions both at macrostructure and microstructure levels. Additionally, certain types of voice as a writer addressing the audience emerged at both levels. The study has research implications for the role of L2 raising audience awareness in developing the L2 writing process and how conference interaction can be effectively promoted through collaborative negotiation. Pedagogical implications are discussed.
참고문헌 (47)
- Adel, A., "Just to give you kind a map of where we are going: Taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English", Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), pp.69~97 (2010)
- Armstrong, K., "Blogging as L2 writing: A case study", AACE Journal, 16(3), pp.233~251 (2008)
- Arsian, R. Ş., "How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners?", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), pp.183~197 (2010)
- Berg, E. C., "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
- Cheng, X., "Metadiscourse and text pragmatics : How students write after learning about metadiscourse", Pragmatics and Language Learning, 7, pp.153~170 (1996)
- Cheng, X., "Metadiscourse : A technique for improving writing", Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2), pp.149~181 (1996)
- Chiu, Y. L. T., "‘Singing your tune’ : Genre structure and writer identity in personal statements for doctoral applications", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, pp.48~59 (2016)
- Crismore, A., "Metadiscourse in Persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students", Written Communication, 10(1), pp.39~71 (1993)
- Cumming, A., "Tutoring second language text revision: Does the approach to instruction or the language of communication make a difference?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(3), pp.197~226 (1996)
- Ede, L., "Audience addressed", audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy, 1984, pp.35(2), 155~171
- Ewert, D. E., "L2 writing conferences : Investigating teacher talk", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), pp.251~269 (2009)
- Faigley, L., "Analyzing revision", College Composition and Communication, 32, pp.400~415 (1981)
- Ferretti, R. P., "The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers", Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, pp.694~702 (2000)
- Ferris, D., "Exploring the dynamics of second language writing", pp.119~140 (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Gregg, N., "Sense of audience and the adult writer: A study across competence levels", Reading and Writing, 8(1), pp.121~137 (1996)
- Harris, M., "Tutoring ESL students : Issues and options", College Composition and Communication, 44(4), pp.525~537 (1993)
- Hyland, K., "Disciplinary interactions : Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), pp.133~151 (2004)
- Intaraprawat P., "The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.253~272 (1995)
- Kessler, G., "Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing", Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), pp.79~95 (2009)
- Kost, C., "Investigating writing strategies and revision behavior in collaborative wiki projects", CALICO Journal, 28(3), pp.606~620 (2013)
- Kroll, B. M., "Writing for readers : Three perspectives on audience", College Composition and Communication, 35(2), pp.172~185 (1984)
- Lee, L., "Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course", ReCALL, 22(2), pp.212~227 (2010)
- Lee, L., "Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course", CALICO Journal, 27(2), pp.260~276 (2013)
- Levy, M., "Culture, culture learning and new technologies : Towards a pedagogical framework", Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), pp.104~127 (2007)
- Levy, M., "Technologies in use for second language learning", The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), pp.769~782 (2009)
- Lim, H. W., "Disciplinary socialization, audience awareness, and the production of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the writing of US and Korean graduate student writers", doctor, pp.2005
- Lin, W. C., "Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses", English Teaching : Practice and Critique, 10(2), pp.88~103 (2011)
- Lunsford, A., "Representing audience: “Successful” discourse and disciplinary critique", College Composition and Communication, 47(2), pp.167~179 (1996)
- Mak, B., "Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong", System, 36(3), pp.437~455 (2008)
- Midgette, E., "The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students", Reading and Writing, 21(1-2), pp.131~151 (2008)
- Min, H. T., "The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), pp.118~141 (2006)
- O’Sullivan, I., "Learners’ writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), pp.49~68 (2006)
- Perez-Llantada, C., "The discourse functions of metadiscourse in published academic writing: Issues of culture and language", Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), pp.41~68 (2010)
- Raimes, A., "What unskilled writers do as they write: A classroom study of composing", TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), pp.229~258 (1985)
- Redd-Boyd, T. M., "The effects of audience specification on undergraduates’ attitudes, strategies, and writing", Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), pp.77~108 (1989)
- Roen, D. H., "The effects of audience awareness on drafting and revising", Research in the Teaching of English, 22(1), pp.75~88 (1988)
- Rubin, D. L., "A sense of audience in written communication", pp.280~399 (1990), Sage
- Shang, H. F., "An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), pp.79~96 (2007)
- Stapleton, P., "Tech-era L2 writing: Towards a new kind of process", ELT Journal, 64(2), pp.175~183 (2010)
- Storch, N., "Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, pp.275~288 (2011)
- Sun, Y. C., "Blogging to learn: Becoming EFL academic writers through collaborative dialogues", Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), pp.43~61 (2012)
- Thonus, T., "Serving generation 1.5 learners in the university writing center", TESOL Journal, 12(1), pp.17~24 (2003)
- Thonus, T., "What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and secondlanguage writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), pp.227~242 (2004)
- Weigle, S. C., "Novice tutors and their ESL tutees: Three case studies of tutor roles and perceptions of tutorial success", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), pp.203~225 (2004)
- Weissberg, R., "Feedback in second language writing. :Contexts and issues", pp.246~265 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Williams, J., "Tutoring and revision : Second language writers in the writing center", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), pp.173~201 (2004)
- Wu, W. S., "The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers", Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature, 3(2), pp.125~138 (2006)