본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korean EFL Students’ Perceptions of Instructor Video and Written Feedback in a Blended Learning Course

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Blended learning is becoming more commonly used in English as a Foreign Language classes around the world. There is a dearth of research on Korean EFL students’ perceptions of instructor video and written feedback in the blended learning classroom. This case study examines Korean EFL students’ perceptions of video and written instructor feedback on discussion forums in a blended learning class using the Canvas Learning Management System. Data was obtained through focus groups, an online discussion forum, and documentation from students’ comments written in response to assignment feedback. Data analysis procedures included coding and developing significant themes that highlighted the primary views of the students. Results indicate that students preferred video feedback in comparison to written feedback. Based on students’ responses, the central themes that emerged include video feedback is personalized and friendly and it is easier to understand in comparison to written feedback. Students also discussed their appreciation for instructor participation in the online discussion forum. Although the benefits of video feedback were highlighted in most students’ responses, some students discussed their preference for written feedback. This study also includes students’ recommendations for improving blended learning classes in the future. Finally, practical implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Abstract

Blended learning is becoming more commonly used in English as a Foreign Language classes around the world. There is a dearth of research on Korean EFL students’ perceptions of instructor video and written feedback in the blended learning classroom. This case study examines Korean EFL students’ perceptions of video and written instructor feedback on discussion forums in a blended learning class using the Canvas Learning Management System. Data was obtained through focus groups, an online discussion forum, and documentation from students’ comments written in response to assignment feedback. Data analysis procedures included coding and developing significant themes that highlighted the primary views of the students. Results indicate that students preferred video feedback in comparison to written feedback. Based on students’ responses, the central themes that emerged include video feedback is personalized and friendly and it is easier to understand in comparison to written feedback. Students also discussed their appreciation for instructor participation in the online discussion forum. Although the benefits of video feedback were highlighted in most students’ responses, some students discussed their preference for written feedback. This study also includes students’ recommendations for improving blended learning classes in the future. Finally, practical implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Adas, D., "Students’ perceptions towards blended learning environment using OCC", An-Najha University Journal(Humanities), 25(6), pp.1681~1710 (2011)
  2. Al Zumor, A. W. Q., "EFL students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement", English Language Teaching, 6(10), pp.95~110 (2013)
  3. Andresen, M. A., "Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations", Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), pp.249~257 (2009)
  4. Barrow, T. H., "Social presence in the asynchronous online classroom: The asynchronous online video conversation", doctor, pp.2012
  5. Bluic, A., "Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education", The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), pp.231~244 (2007)
  6. Borup, J., "Improving online social presence through asynchronous video", The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), pp.195~203 (2012)
  7. Borup, J., "Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses", The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), pp.232~256 (2014)
  8. "Review of blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom" (2007)[URL]
  9. Cavanaugh, A. J., "Audio feedback versus written feedback: Instructors’and students’ perspectives", Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), pp.122~138 (2014)
  10. 차윤정, "Implementation of instructional methods and learners’ views in online", offline business English classes., 2011, pp.14(3), 11~35[DOI]
  11. Chew, E., "To listen or to read?: Audio or written assessment feedback for international students in the UK", On the Horizon, 22(2), pp.127~135 (2014)
  12. 최수영, "수준별 학습이 가능한 온ㆍ오프라인 혼합형 학습이 영어 말하기 능력 신장에 미치는 효과", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 12(3), pp.229~255 (2009), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  13. Cox, S., "Promoting teacher presence : Strategies for effective and efficient feedback to student writing online", Teaching English in the Two Year College, 42(4), pp.376~391 (2015)
  14. Dolittle, P. E., "Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning", Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), pp.83~103 (1997)
  15. Eisenhardt, M. K., "The qualitative research companion", pp.5~35 (2002), Sage
  16. Elbow, P., "A sourcebook for responding to student writing", pp.175~196 (1999), Hampton Press
  17. Fageeh, A., "Effects of blackboard on EFL academic writing and attitudes", The JALT CALL Journal, 9(2), pp.169~196 (2013)
  18. Ferguson, P., "Student perception of quality feedback in teacher education", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), pp.51~62 (2009)
  19. Gallien, T., "Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online course room: Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor?", International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), pp.463~476 (2008)
  20. Ghandoura, W. A., "A qualitative study of ESL college students’ attitudes about computer-assisted writing classes", English Language Teaching, 5(4), pp.57~64 (2012)
  21. Graham, C. R., "A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education", The Internet and Higher Education, 18, pp.4~14 (2013)
  22. Griffiths, M. E., "Using asynchronous video in online classes:Results from a pilot study", International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(3), pp.65~76 (2009)
  23. Hackman, M. Z., "Instructional communication in the televised classroom", Communication Education, 39(3), pp.145~156 (1990)
  24. Hall, A., "Vygotsky goes online: Learning design from a socio-cultural perspective", Learning and Socio-cultural Theory: Exploring Modern Vygotskian Perspectives International Workshop, 1(1), pp.94~107 (2007)
  25. Harrington, M. A., "Problematizing the hybrid classroom for ESL", EFL students, 2010, pp.14(3), 1~13
  26. Hinkelman, D., "Power within blended language learning programs in Japan", Language Learning & Technology, 16(2), pp.46~64 (2012)
  27. Hounsell, D., "The quality of guidance and feedback to students", Higher Education Research and Development, 27(1), pp.55~67 (2008)
  28. Kanuka, H., "An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a textbased Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies", Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(3) (2005)
  29. 김민정, "Korean EFL Students’ Interactional Challenges and Ways to Overcome Them in Blended Learning", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 18(2), pp.59~87 (2015), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  30. 이충현, "A Study on the Effectiveness of Online", Offline English Language Learning at University Level, 2003, pp.6(1), 90~110[DOI]
  31. "Hybrid, blended, flipped, and inverted: Defining terms in a two dimensional taxonomy" (2014)[URL]
  32. Marsh, D., "Blended learning: Creating learning opportunities for language learners" (2012), Cambridge University Press
  33. "Providing feedback in computer-based instruction:What the research tells us" (1999)[URL]
  34. Mathieson, K., "Exploring student perceptions of audiovisual feedback via screencasting in online courses", American Journal of Distance Education, 26(3), pp.143~156 (2012)
  35. McMillan, J. H., "Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry" (2006), Pearson Education
  36. Moore, N. S., "iFeedback : Using video technology for improving student writing", Journal of College Literacy & Learning, 38, pp.3~14 (2012)
  37. "Essay feedback: How can it help students improve their academic writing?" (2001)[URL]
  38. Oh, E., "How are universities involved in blended instruction?", Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), pp.327~342 (2009)
  39. Park, Y., "Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data : A case study in a Korean higher education institute", Internet and Higher Education, 29, pp.1~11 (2016)
  40. Parton, B. S., "Using flip camcorders to create video feedback: Is it realistic for professors and beneficial to students?", International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(1), pp.15~21 (2010)
  41. "Keys to facilitating successful online discussions" (2015)[URL]
  42. Roper, A. R., "How students develop online learning skills", EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(1), pp.62~65 (2007)
  43. Schunk, D. H., "Learning theories : An educational perspective" (2008), Pearson
  44. Singh, H., "A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning" (2001), Centra Software
  45. Sipple, S., "Ideas in practice : Developmental writers’ attitudes toward audio and written feedback", Journal of Developmental Education, 30(3), pp.22~31 (2007)
  46. Thang, S. M., "Using a blended approach to teach English for academic purposes: Malaysian students’ perceptions of redesigned course materials", International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 7(2), pp.142~153 (2014)
  47. Thorne, K., "Blended learning : How to integrate online and traditional learning" (2003), Kogan Page
  48. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  49. "Comparing face-to-face electronic discussion in the second language classroom" (1996)[URL]
  50. Warschauer, M., "Invited commentary: New tools for teaching writing", Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), pp.3~8 (2010)
  51. Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education, "Watson, J.", North American Council for Online Learning, ~ (2008)
  52. Woods, R. H., "Interaction and immediacy in online learning", International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2) (2004)
  53. Wu, J., "An empirical investigation of the critical factors affecting students’ satisfaction in EFL blended learning", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), pp.176~185 (2013)
  54. Yin, R. K., "Case study research : Design and methods" (2003), Sage
  55. 윤서영, "The Perspectives and Effectiveness of Blended Learning in L2 Writing of Korean University Students", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 13(2), pp.177~204 (2010), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)